CES 2012: Prepare for Sub-$500 Ultrathins: AMD's Fusion Trinity, Pictured
January 15, 2012 12:15 PM
comment(s) - last by
(Source: Jason Mick/DailyTech)
AMD rejoins ultrathin push, takes issue with Intel for trademarking "Ultrabook"
Intel Corp. (
) and Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (
) don't exactly see eye to eye on most things, but at the 2012 Consumer Electronics Show, they seemed to both be in agreement that
ultrathin notebook computers were what ready for primetime
AMD, however, was less than thrilled with Intel for
trademarking the name "Ultrabook"
. To AMD this was akin to Intel claiming it invented the ultrathin. In AMD's mind it was the first to push this movement, when it
debutted the Athlon Neo
three years ago. A 1.6 GHz 15 watt BGA-mounted chip, the Neo was indeed much like the ultrathin-aimed chips of today. It was also arguably the precursor to AMD's biggest success story of its CPU business today -- Fusion.
We spoke with AMD's director of global product marketing, John Taylor about ultrabooks and Fusion's road ahead for 2012.
I. AMD Never Expected to Launch Fusion in Q1 2011 -- It Got Lucky
He began with a little history lesson, to put the current events in perspective.
Back in January 2011 AMD's
first family of Fusion APUs ("accelerated" processing units) --
, branded as the C-Series and E-Series. Packing a GPU somewhere between a Radeon 5000 HD and 6000 HD, and a new core architecture --
offered modest CPU performance and strong integrated GPU performance at a budget-friendly price.
But AMD shared a bit of a secret with us --
wasn't intended originally to launch at CES 2011. It was expected to be delivered in Q3 2011, alongside
-- AMD's more powerful Fusion core.
was being contracted to Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Comp., Ltd. (
) (TSMC) for production at the 40 nm node. Meanwhile
was being produced by AMD's chipmaker spinoff GlobalFoundries, Inc. at a smaller 32 nm node.
wasn't bring a wholly new core design to the table. It packed a variant of the well-tread K10-core, the same core found in AMD's
processors. The modified version was known as K10.5 and was codenamed
But it turns out that the target fab for
-- TSMC's 12-inch fab (Fab 14's phase 4 facilities), located in Tainan Science Park, the high-tech manufacturing center of Tainan City, Taiwan -- was surprisingly productive. Despite the new core design, it appears that TSMC's mastery of the 40 nm node allowed it to pump out
wafers at such a brisk pace that just weeks before CES 2011, AMD decided to bump the launch up by almost two quarters and begin shipping in January.
Fusion bucked AMD's trend of late launches, arriving early. The shift was a boon for AMD.
[Image Source: AMD]
The surprise bump was a boon for AMD, propelling Fusion to 20 million units in sales for 2011.
didn't leap ahead like
due ostensibly to difficulties surrounding the fresh 32 nm process, GlobalFoundries at least managed to get it out the door in time. In June,
, branded as the A-Series.
II. Bulldozer, Radeon 7000 Series Design Elements Creep Into Fusion
Fast forward to present and AMD has big plans for Fusion. This time out AMD has scrapped its
) in favor of perfecting
, the first of its successor chips to
While the future of AMD's lighter-weight chips is uncertain, what is clear is that AMD feels that
is the perfect chip to snatch up ultrathin market share.
will pack a powerful on-die GPU, which falls somewhere between a
Radeon 6000 HD
in architecture. It will also ditch the aging K10 architecture for a leaner, enhanced 32 nm
, which came in traditional packaging,
is coming in a new ball-grid array (BGA) package, making it friendly for ultrathins.
The chip is still built on the 32 nm process and is expected to come in at 17 watts for lower clocked ultrathin models, and a 35 watt model for traditional laptops. AMD predicts 25 percent faster CPU performance and 50 percent better GPU performance, versus
Picture top to bottom:
's on-die GPU is partially derived from)
Mr. Taylor comments, "We'll be on top in battery life. We expect to be clearly, demonstratively better [results] on the visul performance of the system [versus Intel]."
I asked if AMD was worried about
, Intel's upcoming desktop and notebook chip, which will offer power-sipping performance thanks to the new
leakage-resistant 22-nm 3D FinFET transistor design
. Mr. Taylor hinted that he thinks Intel may struggle with bringing their DirectX 11 solution --
-- to market, commenting, "I understand they had a little trouble showing that at their event earlier this week."
The comment alludes to Intel's Ultrabook press conference earlier in the week where Mooly Eden was caught showing using video to
fake a demo an
playing the DirectX 11 game "Formula 1 2011". It is unclear why Intel faked the demo -- but it certainly gave competitors like AMD fodder for speculation that Intel's ambitious process plans may be hitting some speed-bumps.
Intel got caught faking a DirectX 11
demo, much to AMD's amusement.
Ultrathins Look to Outprice Intel Models by Hundreds of Dollars
AMD hints that we will see at least 18 to 22 ultrathin designs powered by
in 2012, compared to Intel's plans for up to 70 designs.
However, AMD may find its ultrathins to be more popular due to its aggressive pricing. While Intel's designs will mostly fall in the $700-$1,000 USD range, AMD is planning
based designs which will be priced at $500 USD or below.
AMD was showing off one such notebook by Taiwanese manufacturer ASUSTek Computer Inc. (
). It was playing the DirectX 11 game Dirt and unlike Intel's demo there was no fakery -- we were actually able to physically verify the that the notebook was actually running the game. AMD humorously had placed the ultrabook inside a desktop PC case, removing the side panel to reveal the glorious truth.
Much is still unknown about
, including clock designs and the finer details of the GPU core. Another big unanswered question is what the fate of AMD's TSMC-based lower end cores is, with the cancellation of
, et al. But AMD seems very confident that we will be pleased when it reveals more details in a few weeks at its February financial analysts' meeting.
Ultimately the success or failure of
will likely boil down to one factor -- availability. But given AMD isn't moving to a new process node (32 nm was used for both
) it seems like availability will likely be decently high.
AMD's comments lead us to believe that Trinity will land at roughly the same time as
did -- a June (H1/Q2 2012) launch.
In 2011 Fusion gained ground on Intel due to one factor -- price.
substantially in CPU performance, but given that it delivered
better integrated GPU performance at a lower price
, it still proved very popular. With
landing at around the same time as
, both companies appear to be sticking to their approach from the last generation.
Intel will be launching a more powerful chip, but will only be featured in pricier notebooks. AMD, meanwhile, won't be aiming at the CPU performance crown, but does look to deliver the best graphics and battery life performance in an ultrathin. And it looks to undercut Intel-based models by as much as $200 USD.
Expect big things from
in 2012. After all, if consumers are presented the choice between a $500 USD ultrabook and a $700 USD ultrabook, both of which can play most of the latest games and handle everyday productivity software (e.g. Microsoft Corp.'s (
) Office and Adobe Systems Inc.'s (
) CS5/Photoshop), which do you think consumers will pick?
IV. AMD Not Worried About ARM
Unlike ARM Holdings plc (
) and Intel, who are waging a highly public war of words regarding x86 (CISC) versus ARM (RISC), AMD is taking a softer approach, despite its support of x86.
Mr. Taylor tells us, "There's room for everyone."
The implied message is of course that "the enemy of my enemy is my friend." Analyst opinions vary pretty wildly on the topic of ARM. One of my fellow analysts went as far as to suggest that Intel
ARM Holdings, a rather ludicrous proposition from an antitrust perspective, alone, in my estimation. But I felt one of the bettery opinions I heard was from another analyst who stated, "2012 will be a challenging year for Intel -- you have ARM atttacking from one end and AMD from another."
This quote indeed summarizes the situation well. Intel is finding that it may be king of pure computing power per CPU core, but power, graphics, and price are proving key obstacles to its goal of global CPU hegemony.
All images © of Jason Mick and DailyTech LLC, except for APU banner graphic, which is property of AMD.
This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled
1/16/2012 9:07:34 AM
You likely aren't going to see a Trinity based Ultrabook appear in the $600 range, at least not one that's comparable to what's already on the market.
An Asus UX31 can be had for $1100, but the majority of that isn't the CPU. Making $500 Trinity laptop might not be a challenge, but making a budget offering under 3lbs without horrible flex, with a decent screen, and with a reasonable sized SSD would be. You might be able to make a <1" thick, <3lbs laptop for $500, but it would likely be so compromised no one would want to use it.
I would expect decent Trinity ultrabooks to fall right in line with Intel's pricing, at least within a hundred bucks or two. You'll give up some processing power but gain a good bit more GPU power. An FX-4100 clocked down fit within a 17W envelope isn't exactly going to set the world on fire either, so hopefully Piledriver brings some improvements to the table. Luckily for this segment having huge horsepower on tap isn't necessary.
I'm thinking of picking up a Trinity based notebook to replace my aging one, if the providers execute correctly. I want something in the 13" form factor like the UX31, that's light without feeling cheap. I just hope we get some nice Trinity designs with quality materials and they don't just try and use it in budget products.
"It's okay. The scenarios aren't that clear. But it's good looking. [Steve Jobs] does good design, and [the iPad] is absolutely a good example of that." -- Bill Gates on the Apple iPad
CES 2012: Intel -- 2012 is the Year of the Ultrabook
January 9, 2012, 12:05 PM
AMD Regains Single-GPU Performance Crown From NVIDIA, For Now
December 22, 2011, 2:07 PM
Quick Note: AMD's Powers up With Stronger, Overclockable "Fusion" CPUs
December 20, 2011, 3:19 PM
AMD Launches FX CPUs with Bulldozer Architecture
October 12, 2011, 12:01 AM
2012, 2013 AMD Fusion Products Detailed in Leaked Slides
September 24, 2011, 7:31 PM
5 Top Rated Printers for Home or Small Office
July 29, 2016, 10:44 PM
5 Excellent Cable Modems: Buy Your Own and Avoid Rental Fees
July 28, 2016, 8:44 PM
"Prepare to be Punished": Microsoft is Killing OneDrive With Cuts, Blames Users
November 3, 2015, 8:23 PM
Apple's New "Magic" Peripheral Line Packs High Tech, High Prices
October 13, 2015, 9:39 PM
Samsung Adds 2 TB 850 EVO, PRO SSDs for $800, $1000
July 7, 2015, 4:23 PM
Seagate Senior Researcher: Heat Can Kill Data on Stored SSDs
May 13, 2015, 2:49 PM
Most Popular Articles
Say Goodbye to Data Plans - Sprint and T-Mobile offer Unlimited Data
August 22, 2016, 6:12 AM
Uber - Everyone's Autonomous Car Driver?
August 20, 2016, 6:01 AM
Lenovo vs. Asus vs. HP - Best Laptop Under $500.00
August 19, 2016, 4:00 AM
2 NEW PlayStation 4 Models - Unveiling September 7th
August 23, 2016, 6:23 AM
Get Ready to wait in line – iPhone 7 due September.
August 18, 2016, 7:15 AM
Latest Blog Posts
Coming Soon - Drones and Airports
Aug 24, 2016, 12:40 PM
SolarCity’s Gigafactory: A Milesone in Emerging Technology by Lily Emamian - 15 August 2016
Aug 15, 2016, 6:30 AM
Sceptre Airs 27", 120 Hz. 1080p Monitor/HDTV w/ 5 ms Response Time for $220
Dec 3, 2014, 10:32 PM
Costco Gives Employees Thanksgiving Off; Wal-Mart Leads "Black Thursday" Charge
Oct 29, 2014, 9:57 PM
"Bear Selfies" Fad Could Turn Deadly, Warn Nevada Wildlife Officials
Oct 28, 2014, 12:00 PM
More Blog Posts
Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. -
Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information