Secure Wi-Fi? Not so Much -- Gaping Hole Found in WPS Pin System
December 29, 2011 12:42 PM
comment(s) - last by
The Department of Homeland Security suggests the only solution is to disable WPS
NETGEAR, Inc. (
), Cisco System, Inc.'s (
) Linksys, D-Link Corp (
), and Belkin, Inc. are some of the biggest makers of routers. If you own a router, there's a good chance you own a router from one of these manufacturers. And if you own a router from them, there's a good chance you used Wi-Fi Protected Setup (WPS) -- a PIN protected method -- to easily set up your home network. And that means that there's a good chance your security is now at serious risk.
WPS was dreamed up by
the Wi-Fi Alliance
as a means of easing the pain of home networking. But by including a flag in the EAP-NACK message, the standard unwittingly left a gaping hole that can be exploited by hackers to subvert your router.
The message tells the user if the first half of the pin they typed was right. Thus it drastically reduces the time needed to crack the PIN using a brute force attack. Add in that the last bit of the PIN is always its checksum, you have a recipe for a security disaster.
[Image Source: Best Wireless Internet Routers Blog]
The flaw reduces the time it takes to crack your average PIN from 10
attempts to 10
attempts (11,000 attempts total). Assuming you can fire off ten requests or more a second, you should be able to crack routers in minutes.
U.S. Department of Homeland Security
issued a warning
to the public
about the flaw. It
disabling WPS. This may be a painful option for less savvy operators, though, as setting up a network with more sophisticated protections can require a bit of learning.
the vulnerability and reported it to the DHS. He claims that none of the major manufacturers stepped up to the plate with a patch. He is going to release a C-coded exploitation tool shortly -- perhaps that will help prompt the business into action.
.BrainDump (Stefan Viehbock)
Department of Homeland Security
This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled
12/29/2011 1:33:06 PM
Yes, because no one in the suburbs has any malicious intent.
The reason you protect your network is more to protect yourself. If someone attempts to hack the FBI using your wireless network you have no way to prove it wasn't you. I've also seen a case where excessive piracy on a compromised wireless network caused the person's service to be disconnected.
Just a thought for you. And I don't see why WPS is supposedly easier than a WPA2 key anyway. Something as simple as "MyDogWearsCatPants1" will make it nearly impossible to crack your wirelss network. And who would forget that?
12/29/2011 6:38:15 PM
Actually I've seen an insecure wireless network used as a successful defense in court case. The anti-piracy lawyers was unable to prove beyond reasonable doubt who had been downloading and sharing some movies - all they could document what internet connection was used and since the network was open...
That being said I agree one should protect ones network. Just imagine some perv parked outside using ones network and next you might end up in a sex offender database. Small risk but...
12/29/2011 7:23:23 PM
that's the same combination as my luggage!
"We’re Apple. We don’t wear suits. We don’t even own suits." -- Apple CEO Steve Jobs
Homeland Security Warns About Latest Dangerous Apple Browser Bug
May 10, 2010, 5:20 PM
WiGig Specifications Completed
December 10, 2009, 11:16 AM
Twitter Senior VP: "Diversity is Important, But We Can’t Lower the Bar"
November 9, 2015, 9:59 AM
CNN Resorts to Internet Censorship to Promote Clinton Over Senator Sanders
October 15, 2015, 2:47 PM
Breaking Bad: How to Crash Google's Chrome Browser With Just 8 Characters
September 23, 2015, 11:08 AM
Quick Note: Amazon UK Offers £10 Back on Any Order £50 or Over
August 3, 2015, 12:05 PM
Editorial: Reddit Allows Itself to be Hijacked as a Hate Platform For Racist Bigots
July 21, 2015, 6:32 PM
Mozilla and Facebook to Adobe: It's Time to Kill Flash
July 20, 2015, 6:30 PM
Latest Blog Posts
Sceptre Airs 27", 120 Hz. 1080p Monitor/HDTV w/ 5 ms Response Time for $220
Dec 3, 2014, 10:32 PM
Costco Gives Employees Thanksgiving Off; Wal-Mart Leads "Black Thursday" Charge
Oct 29, 2014, 9:57 PM
"Bear Selfies" Fad Could Turn Deadly, Warn Nevada Wildlife Officials
Oct 28, 2014, 12:00 PM
The Surface Mini That Was Never Released Gets "Hands On" Treatment
Sep 26, 2014, 8:22 AM
ISIS Imposes Ban on Teaching Evolution in Iraq
Sep 17, 2014, 5:22 PM
More Blog Posts
Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. -
Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information