backtop


Print 19 comment(s) - last by wempa.. on Dec 29 at 10:52 AM

Pirates win the day, even as movie studio faces its own claims of infringement, exploitation of U.S. soldiers

It was supposed to be a landmark case against file sharing.  Hoping to sue those who downloaded its Hurt Locker film via torrent, Voltage Pictures retained the services of the U.S. Copyright Group (USCG), led by the trio of Washington, D.C. lawyers Thomas Dunlap, Daniel Grubb, and J.W. Weaver.  The USCG quickly unloaded lawsuit claims against 47K members of the unwitting American public, even as Voltage Picture spewed a stream of vitriol suggesting that the children and families of file sharers would hopefully "end up in jail".  

With an average target settlement of $2,000 USD, USCG and Voltage hoped to rake in $94M USD -- a blockbuster total.  If the scheme worked it could have launched a new era of reverse class action claims, in which media corporations targeted thousands of members of the public for hundreds of millions in damages.  In fact, the USCG alone announced a goal of suing over 150,000 Americans for copyright infringement of various works.

Instead the case imploded.  Internet service providers, wary of throwing out paying customers and spending extra money to track down the infringers carried out the USCG's requests for information at a leisurely pace.

A panicked USCG was forced to drastically scale down the claims to 2,300 defendants.

But in the end even that wasn't enough.  Without sufficient information to carry out its reverse class action tactic, the USCG was forced to grovel before the presiding judge asking for extension after extension.

In the end, despite the fact that the presiding judge -- Judge Beryl Howell -- was a former RIAA lobbyist who spent years decrying the evils of piracy, even he grew tired of the USCG's antics.  After asking for one extension too many, he threw the group's case out of court, ending Voltage Picture's costly experiment in mass litigation.

Hurt Locker
A scene from The Hurt Locker [Image Source: AP]

The death of the lawsuit is a victory for those who claim that the U.S. intellectual property system is out of control and out of touch with modern reality.  While many of these individuals frown on piracy, they find charging citizens thousands of dollars for what amounts to petty theft to be a ludicrous proposition.  

They also point to growing legal support for the notion that an IP address cannot be equated to a person -- something the tech community has long understood.  Given that somebody can crack your Wi-Fi connection, download content, and leave you with the fine, this seems a pretty valid point.

Voltage, for its part, appears to be unwilling to give up the fight.  It reportedly is changing gears, hoping to launch a number of smaller suits against individuals, with higher settlement targets.

But like the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA), it may find itself fighting against the wind.  The RIAA spent $64M USD to win a mere $1.4M USD from pirates during its most prolific lawsuit period between 2006 and 2008.

The greatest irony is perhaps that, like big music labels, Voltage and Hurt Locker writer Mark Boal are accused of ripping off and stealing intellectual property from "the little guy".  A U.S. Army Master Sgt. Jeffrey S. Sarver has accused Mr. Boal and Voltage of lifting the plot from Mr. Boal's time spent with Sgt. Sarver's company, while passing the story off as fiction in order to make sure the soldiers who put their lives on the line to serve received no compensation.  The accusations are similar to those leveled against major music labels who reportedly have been engaging in large scale theft of works of independent artists.


Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Grammatical Reicht
By Namey on 12/27/2011 2:59:00 PM , Rating: 0
"fighting against the wind" maybe instead use "fighting the current"

"pissing in the wind" is the closest to that idiom I know of.

*heads off to google to check




RE: Grammatical Reicht
By mindless1 on 12/27/2011 8:30:17 PM , Rating: 2
No. Running into the wind, or swimming against the current.

Take your time googling, maybe you'll find out that people don't appreciate such whiny posting about idealized grammar.


RE: Grammatical Reicht
By Namey on 12/28/2011 8:06:17 AM , Rating: 2
Disrespectful and unappreciative to the author, maybe. Whiny? Not so much. I would probably classify the tone of your response as whiny, rather than my original comment ;)

Oh and google tells me that "Running into the wind" is not an idiom.

I think "swimming against the current" is the best.


RE: Grammatical Reicht
By JonB on 12/28/2011 5:02:44 PM , Rating: 2
Jim Croce would say "Don't Spit Into the Wind" but that was from a list of "don'ts" like Tugging on Superman's Cape or Pulling the Mask off of the Lone Ranger.

and don't mess with around with Jim. :)


"The Space Elevator will be built about 50 years after everyone stops laughing" -- Sir Arthur C. Clarke














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki