Print 47 comment(s) - last by Mint.. on Dec 20 at 12:15 PM

Could the proposed standards lead to automakers vacating smaller platforms?

The proposed CAFE standards that have been looming all year will force some major changes on the automotive market. The government says that the much more stringent fuel economy standard will save consumers at the pump and reduce the national need for foreign oil. The auto industry has said that the cost of meeting the standard would increase the cost of new vehicles and could result in lost jobs.
According to a new study published by the University of Michigan, the CAFE standards will make cars larger, not smaller. The study indicates that there is a loophole in the economy standards that the automakers could exploit.
"For just about all the scenarios, the car got bigger,” said Steven Skerlos, an associate professor at U-M Department of Mechanical Engineering. “What you can model in a computer is different from reality, but based on this research we expect it to happen."
The loophole is that the formula used for determining miles per gallons required under the new standard uses the vehicles footprint (multiplying the wheelbase by track width). This was done to give larger vehicles less stringent economy standards to follow. In a nutshell, the formula favors larger vehicles and those vehicles may be less costly since they wouldn't have to use as much technology for fuel gains. 
Therefore, automakers may design new vehicles to be larger in an effort to target the lower economy standards. The study also claims that not only would the automakers considering redesigning a vehicle to go for the lower economy limits undermine the CAFE standard goals, but it would also create more pollution
"This study illustrates that there may be a substantial financial incentive to produce larger vehicles, and that it can undermine the goals of the policy," said Kate Whitefoot, who conducted the research as a U-M design science doctoral student and is now a senior program officer at the National Academy of Engineering.

Source: AutoNews

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

By Stuka on 12/14/2011 2:02:10 PM , Rating: 2
This makes me picture all cars as widebodies, which is a HUGE PLUS! Footprint says nothing of mass, so a lighter car will go farther to promote fuel economy than a larger one will gain in rule exploitation. So, lightweight, widebody Mustangs for everybody!! I love me some low offset wheels.

RE: Hmmm...
By lagomorpha on 12/15/2011 2:17:07 AM , Rating: 2
Enjoy your wide, light bodies twisting noticably every time you corner modestly hard. oh wait Mustangs cant do that anyway :P

RE: Hmmm...
By Spuke on 12/15/2011 1:27:35 PM , Rating: 2
oh wait Mustangs cant do that anyway :P
Guess you haven't read a car magazine lately.

RE: Hmmm...
By Dr of crap on 12/15/2011 9:03:40 AM , Rating: 2
I have to agree with the wider part.

I hate the small car that are ALL reduced in width and yet increased in height. Makes for worse handling than if they went for wider and lower.

The older Civics were lower and wider, not sure of the new ones.

"The whole principle [of censorship] is wrong. It's like demanding that grown men live on skim milk because the baby can't have steak." -- Robert Heinlein

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki