backtop


Print 64 comment(s) - last by Just Tom.. on Dec 16 at 8:48 AM


  (Source: BBC)
Two separate experiments at the Large Hadron Collider bring scientists closer to elusive building block of Universe

For a week, anticipation has been building for the press conference held this morning by scientists from the European Organization for Nuclear Research in Switzerland. Speculation abounded that they would announce evidence of the misnamed "God particle," the Higgs boson, which gives all matter mass.

So, now that 8 a.m. ET on December 13, 2011 has passed, are we any closer to finding the so-called God particle? Well, maybe.

According to the BBC, researchers at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) in Switzerland say that two experiments there may have resulted in glimpses of the Higgs boson. However, they do not have enough evidence yet to make a solid claim.

So why all the fuss? 

"The Higgs is the final piece of the Standard Model of Particle Physics which is, itself, the crowning achievement of subatomic physics. Called the 'God Particle' by some, the Higgs is responsible for giving all the other flecks of matter in this Universe the remarkable property we think of as mass. Physicists have been hunting the Higgs for decades," explains Adam Frank at NPR's 13.7 blog.

Evidence of the Higgs would be one of the most significant scientific advances in 60 years. 

The two separate experiments at the LHC — Atlas and CMS — have been searching for the basic building block of the Universe independently. "Because the Standard Model does not predict an exact mass for the Higgs, physicists have to use particle accelerators like the LHC to systematically look for it across a broad search area," the BBC reports.

Both experiments have reportedly seen a data "spike" around a mass of 125 Gigaelectronvolts. While this isn't enough to confirm the Higgs' discovery, it is enough to generate mass excitement (pun definitely intended) in scientific circles.

Perhaps now all the citizens CERN recruited to help find the Higgs can go back to their day jobs.

Sources: BBC, NPR



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Woohoo
By ShieTar on 12/13/2011 10:27:08 AM , Rating: -1
We already know how to create artificial gravity (just accelerate/rotate the room) and anti gravity (just let the room fall freely).
And you can declare mass as negative by just redefining your personal zero. That's useless of course, but nobody is going stoping you.
For all everyday technological purposes, Newtons laws on gravity are still good anyways. Doesn't matter why they work, as long as they do.


RE: Woohoo
By yomamafor1 on 12/13/2011 11:15:02 AM , Rating: 2
Umm... rotating the room is not artificial gravity, since it wasn't men-made. It would be more fitting to call it manipulated room to achieve acceleration. Also, anti-gravity != manipulate the acceleration of mass to achieve zero change in acceleration.

To say that we should stop funding these researches because "things just work" is unscientific. Human are always looking for the advancement of technologies to better themselves. 95% of the stuff you take for granted everyday wouldn't exist if scientists before you held the idea of "things just work".


"My sex life is pretty good" -- Steve Jobs' random musings during the 2010 D8 conference

Related Articles













botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki