backtop


Print 51 comment(s) - last by Wolfpup.. on Jan 4 at 5:44 PM


  (Source: applenerd.net)
iPad 2 successor possibly to hit stores as early as February

While this can be lumped squarely in the "unconfirmed" column, rumors have begun swirling about the possibility of Apple's next-generation tablet, the iPad 3, launching within the next "three to four months."

Anonymous sources in the supply chain are cited by DigiTimes saying that the parts and components for the iPad 3 are being delivered to OEM contractors while reducing deliveries for the iPad 2. 

"OEM production of iPad 2 will remain high at 14-15 million units in the fourth quarter of 2011 but decline to 4-5 million units in the first quarter of 2012, paving the way for the launch of the new iPads," DigiTimes writes.

The rumors are bolstered by further reports from a Chinese Commercial Times report that says Foxconn will begin production on the new models in January, and increasing production by February.

The aforementioned anonymous supply-chain sources say that anywhere from 9.5 to 9.8 million units of the iPad 3 will be produced in Q1 of 2012.

Another report from last week, this one from the L.A. Times, cited February as the target launch date, so the new timeframe isn't too far off. 

According to the Times, the iPad 3 will be similar to its predecessor, but will include Apple's retina display, doubling the resolution found on the current model.

The original iPad launched in April 2010. The iPad 2 launched in March 2011. If Apple's 11-month trend for next generation of its popular tablet continues, February 2012 would be the target.

With increased competition in the tablet market from the likes of Microsoft and additional Android offerings, Apple might be feeling a sense of urgency to stay ahead of the curve if it wants to hold on to its tablet market share.

Sources: DigiTimes, LA Times



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: 3 million pixels
By MrTeal on 12/12/2011 12:21:05 PM , Rating: 2
Well yeah, 1080p panels are a dime a dozen. That's the problem, getting 2 or 3 24" 16:9 panels across a desk requires a huge amount of real estate. Often for doing real work on a computer (productivity, coding, etc) having more vertical pixels is more helpful than having more horizontal pixels. 16:9 panels also don't work nearly as well when rotated to portrait, so even that becomes difficult.

That's my main point I guess. They can likely sell an iPad3 for $500 with a 10" 2048x1536 IPS screen. If you shop around you can find 22" 1080p IPS monitors for $200 to $250 (the one you linked is TN, btw). There should be no reason that it's not possible to make a reasonably priced 4:3 monitor with an IPS panel and decent resolution, other than the fact that the panel makers decided to standardize on widescreen TV resolutions. I use two 19" 1280x1024 monitors at work because they actually give me more height than a 24" 1080p panel. 5:4 is an awesome aspect ratio, and I'd love to upgrade to a larger display and higher resolution without needing so much horizontal desk space.


"Death Is Very Likely The Single Best Invention Of Life" -- Steve Jobs














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki