backtop


Print 36 comment(s) - last by fteoath64.. on Dec 16 at 4:03 AM


RQ-170 Sentinel  (Source: muslimmedianetwork.com)
However, a Lexington Institute analyst said that all signs point to the RQ-170 Sentinel as the missing drone

Analysts and Pentagon officials have placed serious doubts on Iran's claims to have shot down a stealthy U.S. aircraft earlier this week, saying that the craft likely experienced mechanical malfunctions instead.

On Sunday, Iran claimed that its military shot down a stealthy unmanned RQ-170 Sentinel reconnaissance aircraft which is now in its possession. Iran later said that it used a cyber attack to bring the aircraft down, and that it is "largely intact," but it has not provided any evidence of either claim.

According to Lexington Institute analyst Loren Thompson, there was no evidence that the drone was brought down using physical activity. Thompson added that using cyber warfare to bring down the aircraft was unlikely as well because it is a stealth drone.

"It would be almost impossible for Iran to shoot down an RQ-170 because it is stealthy; therefore, the Iranian air defenses can't see it," said Thompson. "Partly for the same reason, it is exceedingly unlikely that they used a cyber attack to bring down the aircraft."

While the Pentagon may disagree with how the drone was brought down, it's not arguing that an aircraft is indeed missing. U.S. Army Lt. Col. Jimmie Cummings, spokesman for NATO's International Security Assistance Force (ISAF)-Afghanistan, said that he cannot confirm if the missing aircraft is a RQ-170.

However, Thompson said that all signs point to the RQ-170 Sentinel as the missing drone. He added that the Sentinel likely malfunctioned and crashed, and was probably not shot down or attacked in any way by Iran. The fact that the drone was lost indicates that there was likely a software problem.

If this is the case, Iran has a useless weapon on its hand. Many worried that the Iranian military could extract secrets behind U.S. military technologies by possessing the drone, but with hardware or software malfunctions, the aircraft is useless in providing what they're looking for.

Even if the Sentinel is useless at this point, the crash has raised doubts about the use of unmanned stealth drones and their abilities.

Source: Defense News



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Pie in face
By petrosy on 12/7/2011 5:56:50 PM , Rating: 4
Is this the same stealth tech that "did not" get shot down in the Balkans.

So they shot one down... so what. The military should be more concerned with trying to prevent this from happening in the future than stroking their egos maybe




RE: Pie in face
By cmdrdredd on 12/7/2011 9:43:20 PM , Rating: 2
it is more advanced than the f-117 for sure.


RE: Pie in face
By TSS on 12/8/2011 4:04:14 AM , Rating: 2
Stealth wise it's probably not that much more advanced then the F-117 + 20 years of chinese development ontop of that tech. Considering how stealthy the first US drones where even though you already had stealth technology, and that the tech is still in it's infancy (compared to full blown AI jet fighters which is where this is headed).

They could maybe learn something from the AI, but not much. I suspect much of it is completly custom to the aircraft. While the technology can be reverse engineered, to actually make a drone of your own would require just as much effort as creating the first drone. And if the iranians could do that they'd already have drones of their own.

IMO, i'm not too worried by all of this. Even if they did shoot it down. The tech is still too new for anybody to copy without direct help within the next 10-20 years and the technology develops fast enough that their drones will be vastly inferior by the time they come out.


"We can't expect users to use common sense. That would eliminate the need for all sorts of legislation, committees, oversight and lawyers." -- Christopher Jennings














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki