IBM's New Racetrack Memory is on an IC, But Only has "One Car" Per Lane
December 6, 2011 7:00 PM
comment(s) - last by
Polished next-gen. iteration of nanowire-based memory could offer speed, power, and density improvements
Stop us if you've heard this before: International Business Machines, Inc. (
) claims it's cooked up the super-memory of the future, which be smaller, better, faster, stronger than current designs.
I. Starting the Race
The company demoed has at last demoed a full-fledged prototype of the device, dubbed "racetrack" memory. "
consists of one or more nanowire loops, each of which is partially magnetized.
Within each wire, magnetized stripes represent the default on state -- a binary "1" or a "0" -- while demagnetized magnetic stripes represent the default off state. When a current is applied, the magnetized regions "flow" down the wire (or "race", hence racetrack). This allows the memory to be rewritten by a static head. As there are no moving components, there'd likely be a reduced risk of failure, and possibly faster reads/writes contingent on the limiting material property -- the speed of the magnetic pattern flow along the nanowire.
[Images Source: IBM]
IBM research fellow Stuart Parkin
devised the concept back in 2002
and by 2004 had received a patent on some of the underlying principles. An early prototype was implemented around 2008, but that prototype had the magnetic writing heads and wire current controls tied to external circuitry, while the nanowires were housed in a piece of test silicon. The lab-bench style prototype was far from a realistic implementation.
II. Back on the Racetrack, Now Inside an IC
Now IBM has manufactured a CMOS circuit composed of 10 micrometers long, 150 nanometers wide, and 20 nanometers thick nanowires. The thinnest diameter of a human hair is ~8.5 micrometers [
], so at least 180,000 of the nanowires could fit within the cross section of a human hair. Also present in the new fully integrated design are the appropriate controllers and polarizable heads, which allow for writing to the "tracks".
IBM has finally achieved an integrated circuit form factor for its racetrack memory.
[Image Source: IBM]
CMOS (complementary metal-oxide semiconductor) is a widely used circuit production technique, so the new second-generation prototype could be manufactured cheaply at standard chip fabrication facilities. The crucial step would be depositing the nickel-metal alloy and then etching with acid to leave behind nanowires.
Professor Parkin describes the integrated prototype commenting, "All the circuits were separate from the chip with the nanowires on. Now we've been able to make the first integrated version with everything on one piece of silicon."
III. Poor Materials Make This a "One Car" Race
The only outstanding issue for the prototype is that it was only tested writing one bit stripe per nanowire. IBM blames this "one car race" on the poor performance of its soft magnetic material, nickel-iron.
The magentic nickel-iron mix found in the current gen racetrack memory is a nanoscopic peer to magnetic nickel-iron meteorites. But it's unfortunately not a very good reliable material for the job. [Image Source: First Point Minerals]
Professor Parkins is leading a team of researchers at IBM's Almaden, California research facility, investigating alternative materials. They're currently testing a hard magnetic material, which derives its magnetism from its crystal structure. They claim the initial performance they're seeing is much better.
The lobby of IBM's Almaden, Calif. research center, the birthplace of racetrack memory. [Image Source: Sydney Morning Herald]
Comments Professor Parkins, "Using this different material, we have discovered we can move the domain walls [between magnetic stripes] very fast and that they are much smaller and stronger than in the soft magnetic material used in the integrated devices. I call this racetrack 2.0."
But there's some friendly competition in this race. The
Institute of Fundamental Electronics
in Orsay, France -- a collaboration between the
University of Paris SUD
Le Centre national de la recherche scientifique
(CNRF), the French national research center (think U.S. national lab) -- have a team actively working on testing new racetrack designs with novel materials.
A peek at the standard interface to the IFE's racetrack memory chip: the French research institution is work on trying to find a better magnetic material for the device.
[Image Source: IFE]
Dafiné Ravelosona, a Ph.D researcher at the institute, praised the work by IBM, but also pointed to the single bit flaw, opining, "It's a nice demonstration that shows it's possible to make this kind of memory using CMOS. They have only demonstrated that it is possible to move a single bit in each nanowire."
His team hopes to find the perfect nanowire material before IBM does.
The important fundamental questions to ask regarding whatever material the two groups concoct are:
1. How good are the material properties?
2. How abundant is the material? (i.e. How cheap is the material?)
3. How easy is the material to adapt to common silicon fabrication processes?
IV. Spintronics v. the HP Memristor
While "spintronics" (spin as in "magnetic
" + "elec
) solutions like racetrack memory represent one potential answer to the future memory riddle, other parties have competing ideas.
IBM's enterprise hardware rival Hewlett-Packard Comp. (
) is racing to bring its own novel solution -- memristors -- to market.
First realized by HP in 2008
, the memristor also relies on nanowires. But rather than nickel-iron, titanium dioxide (TiO
) is used.
And rather than storing data as strips of magnetized atoms on a long nanowire, the memristor stores data as a resistance value. The resistance is controlled by current, which causes a directional drift in Oxygen electron vacancies. After enough current, enough of the vacancies shift to reach a steady state resistance in a certain direction. The device can be "read" by checking the voltage at low current (V=iR), while the data (the resistance value) can be set by applying a current to either increase the resistance towards the maximum or a reverse current to decrease it.
A memristor chip under the microscope at HP [Image Source: HP Labs]
HP's technology has some advantages to spintronic solutions.
The memristor is closer to market, with HP predicting
a H1 2013 hardware launch
. Flexible memristors (using titanium dioxide gel) have also been demonstrated, meaning the technology could be applied to coming flexible electronics applications, like
. By contrast racetrack memory is much farther from the market, with no finite timeline for a market launch as the hunt for ideal magnetic material continues.
HP's claims might raise skepticism, but the company has
published data supporting
that its second generation design has achieved ~1 GHz switching times for a 3 nm x 3 nm memristor, with hole thermal velocity of 1 m/s. This defies critics who claimed the material would switch too slow to be a feasible memory replacement (claims that were supported by silicon nanowires' higher hole thermal mobility of
up to 165,000 m/s
at room temperature).
The memory product is expected to be dubbed resistive random access memory (RRAM) when it hits the market.
V. Memristors Double as Computers
The memristor also can also be used with common metal wires to create a replacement to the transistor. By adding crossing metal nanowires:
A memristor in "crossbar latch" configuration [Image Source: HP]
With memristors in between acting as reprogrammable interconnects, the resulting "crossbar latch" circuit can act as any of the traditional logic gates, and together can be chained together to produce larger fundamental circuit elements, like the half adder.
The memristor half-adder [Image Source: Wikipedia]
Additionally, there are already two approaches to producing circuits with crossbar latches -- one of which uses more bars to produce a purely digital design, and a second of which uses fewer bars for an analog design, that "adds" the incoming signals passing them through a summing amplifier before undergoing analog to digital conversion. The dueling approaches could drive performance of each to new heights.
Think of memristor crosslatch circuits as
a field-programmable gate array (FPGA)
on steroids -- a device literally reprogrammable at the transistor-analogue level. That capability makes the memristor potentially more ubiquitous and hence cheaper than alternatives like racetrack memory.
has worked with HP to develop a memristor powered, reprogrammable chip which
mirrors a neuron
. [Image Source: Boston University]
VI. Other Players Still in the Race
And there's a host of alternative storage technologies also via for the spotlight:
Also by IBM, stores data as nanoscopic pits
High, fully scalable density
Density is being outpaced by advances in traditional hard drives, moving components risks reliability.
NRAM ("Nano Ram")
Carbon nanotubes "touch" when activated, separate when nonactive
Low power, permanent currentless storage, DRAM-like density
Nanotubes are expensive
A mix of silicon, oxygen, and nitrogen, charge is stored in Si3N4 crystal.
Low gate voltage, faster write speeds, fewer defects (longer life)
underdeveloped, leading to deficient areal density.
"Programmable Metalization Cell" (aka. Nanobridge/electrolytic memory/conductive-bridging RAM)
possibility of super-small scale, low power, and low materials cost
Production process is problematic with current fabs.
"Ferroelectric RAM" is similar to DRAM, but uses a ferroelectric material in its capacitor's dielectric
1 ns (fast) switching, uses existing DRAM fab facilities
Shrinking gate to modern <50 nm scales without disrupting ferroelectric properties been a problem, preventing widespread commercialization, despite an early 1980s market entry.
Resistance based cell designing using two magnetic plates, one permanent, one reprogrammable. (also known as: "Spin-Torque Transfer RAM")
Does not degrade, is faster than DRAM, and uses little power.
Adjacent cells disturb each other, limiting scaling.
: "Phase change memory", uses special chalcogenide glass material which when exposed to current heats and becomes amorphous.
Degrades slower than flash, fast-switching, and scalable
Thermal-sensitive, even higher programming current than flash, can't be preprogrammed.
* = FeRAM:
First Sold in 1988 by Fudan Microelectronics Co., Ltd. (
) (the FM1208)
** = MRAM: First sold in 2005 by Freescale (today sold under Everspin spinoff)
*** = PRAM: First sold in 2006 by BAE Systems Plc. (
A comparison of commercialized future flash designs [Kanhoe Xue/University of Colorado]
All of these technologies are competing with the rapidly advancing silicon-based flash memory and with the slow but widespread/cheap magnetic hard disks. Until flash and/or magnetic hard drives hit their "storage wall" (a cessation of improvements to areal density, power, and reliability), these technologies will have to attempt to pass
a moving target
, a tough task.
For a more technically in-depth review of future memory technologies and how they stack up versus good old flash, I recommend
University of Colorado
[PDF], which summarizes the state of the art. Professor Xue is now working at a research lab in France.
This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled
12/7/2011 5:39:56 AM
Great article that I enjoyed reading. Its a good comparison of the various technologies with some in-depth explanation - DT at its best.
I agree that memristors sound like they will be the more successful of the two technologies. Combining logic function with memory function in the one device sounds like it could lead to some truly novel applications.
"Intel is investing heavily (think gazillions of dollars and bazillions of engineering man hours) in resources to create an Intel host controllers spec in order to speed time to market of the USB 3.0 technology." -- Intel blogger Nick Knupffer
Intel's HDCP DRM Scheme Defeated by a Single Sub-$300 FPGA
November 28, 2011, 10:25 AM
HP to Deploy Memristor Powered SSD Replacement Within 18 Months
October 10, 2011, 9:17 AM
Seagate Breaks 1TB/Platter Areal Density Barrier
May 3, 2011, 4:34 PM
HP Labs Shows New Memristor Tech
April 9, 2010, 10:23 AM
HP Invents Fabled Memristor, New Class of Electrical Components
May 1, 2008, 2:14 PM
"Prepare to be Punished": Microsoft is Killing OneDrive With Cuts, Blames Users
November 3, 2015, 8:23 PM
Apple's New "Magic" Peripheral Line Packs High Tech, High Prices
October 13, 2015, 9:39 PM
Samsung Adds 2 TB 850 EVO, PRO SSDs for $800, $1000
July 7, 2015, 4:23 PM
Seagate Senior Researcher: Heat Can Kill Data on Stored SSDs
May 13, 2015, 2:49 PM
How to Recover Most Apps After Your NVIDIA Driver Crashes in Windows 10
March 30, 2015, 12:54 PM
Tinkerer Gets Old School Mac Plus Running on the Modern Web
March 24, 2015, 6:41 PM
Most Popular Articles
Creationists are Mad About Google Doodle Depicting Evolution
November 24, 2015, 8:48 PM
Jumbo Joust: iPad Pro vs. Surface Pro 3 vs. Surface Pro 4
November 11, 2015, 1:00 AM
BlackBerry Priv is an Amazing Android So Secure You May Never Hear of It
November 2, 2015, 2:46 PM
iPhone 7 May Pack 3-4 GB Memory, More Storage; 4-Inch Comeback is Rumored
November 20, 2015, 10:12 PM
"Prepare to be Punished": Microsoft is Killing OneDrive With Cuts, Blames Users
November 3, 2015, 8:23 PM
Latest Blog Posts
Sceptre Airs 27", 120 Hz. 1080p Monitor/HDTV w/ 5 ms Response Time for $220
Dec 3, 2014, 10:32 PM
Costco Gives Employees Thanksgiving Off; Wal-Mart Leads "Black Thursday" Charge
Oct 29, 2014, 9:57 PM
"Bear Selfies" Fad Could Turn Deadly, Warn Nevada Wildlife Officials
Oct 28, 2014, 12:00 PM
The Surface Mini That Was Never Released Gets "Hands On" Treatment
Sep 26, 2014, 8:22 AM
ISIS Imposes Ban on Teaching Evolution in Iraq
Sep 17, 2014, 5:22 PM
More Blog Posts
Copyright 2015 DailyTech LLC. -
Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information