backtop


Print 7 comment(s) - last by thisisaname.. on Dec 2 at 1:48 AM


  (Source: kaltoons.com)
The White House is concerned about the government's "ability to protect citizens" if this bill were to be signed into law

Members of the U.S. House intelligence committee have proposed a bill that would allow private firms to receive cyber threat-related information from government agencies such as the National Security Agency (NSA).

The legislation was proposed Wednesday by Representative Mike Rogers, Republican chairman of the U.S. House intelligence committee, and Representative C.A. "Dutch" Ruppersberger, the committee's senior Democrat.

The bill intends to allow the sharing of classified threat information with defense contractors and internet service providers (ISPs). This would require spy and intelligence agencies to tell ISPs, for example, what types of threats they've identified so that the ISPs can block traffic that contains that particular signature.

In addition, the bill would protect firms who relay cyber threat information to the government from "frivolous" lawsuits.

This bill addresses complaints from ISPs and other private firms regarding the government's lack of information about cyber threats, even though the private sector has informed the government about such threats.

Over the past year alone, many companies and government entities have been hit by cyber attacks such as U.S. defense contractor Lockheed Martin Corp., Citigroup, the Pentagon, and Google.

"Our intelligence agencies collect important information overseas about advanced foreign cyber threats that could dramatically assist the private sector," said Rogers. "The government needs to be able to share this threat intelligence so that the private sector can protect its own networks.

"We will have a catastrophic attack within the next year, whether it's attacking a banking system, a grid system, this is going to happen and we have to make sure that we protect ourselves."

The White House is currently reviewing the bill. It cited concerns about the government's "ability to protect citizens" if this bill were to be signed into law because sensitive information would be released and could land into the wrong hands. This could potentially hold corporations accountable.

The new bill echoes the ideas of former CIA/NSA head Michael Hayden, who said that cyber security threats are "horribly over-classified" back in October.

Source: MSNBC



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: What about senate bill 1867???
By spread on 12/1/2011 7:55:17 PM , Rating: 2
It's always good to give someone endless power. It's never been abused before. Ever. Not one time in history.


RE: What about senate bill 1867???
By thisisaname on 12/1/2011 8:38:15 PM , Rating: 2
I'm going to let you guys do your homework, but here's a couple videos to get you started. This is from Senator Rand Paul's official youtube channel.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rghhz_t5POo

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AKaTxjxnYfE

I don't know if I'm allowed to post video links or not, but I'm going to try.
Now, what concerns the National Defense Authorization Act (senate bill 1867), is sections 1031 and 1032. You can find that info yourself, but there's a lot of disinfo that's getting put out about this, so don't be decieved.
The bill was drafted by Carl Levin and John McCain and they have been trying to cram this through congress. They already passed through closed door secret committees. There was a vote to amend the bill to strike the american citizens part from the bill, and it failed by a vast majority.
The rest if you want any info, is up to you to find.


By thisisaname on 12/2/2011 1:48:51 AM , Rating: 2
Well, MSNBC and CBS are reporting tonight the bill has passed the senate by an overwhelming majority. It goes back to the house to be "reconciled", then it's on its way to the president.
One step closer to martial law. :\


"We can't expect users to use common sense. That would eliminate the need for all sorts of legislation, committees, oversight and lawyers." -- Christopher Jennings














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki