backtop


Print 99 comment(s) - last by Mint.. on Dec 9 at 3:39 PM


President Obama with a Chevrolet Volt

Rep. Mike Kelly (R-PA)  (Source: flickr.com)
Despite recent issues with the Chevrolet Volt's battery, GM expects increased Volt sales for November and a recent survey found that Volt customers are satisfied. A GOP lawmaker may, however, ruin EV success by fighting the $7,500 tax credit

General Motors Co. may have hit a few speed bumps this year with the Chevrolet Volt extended-range EV's battery-related incidents, but things seem to be looking up with an expected increase in November Volt sales and a recent survey that confirmed Volt customer satisfaction.

The Chevrolet Volt had its best-ever sales month in October 2011, but according to GM Spokesman Jim Cain, November Volt sales are expected to surpass the previous month.

In October, GM sold 1,108 Volts, which was the first time it had outsold the Nissan Leaf EV since April. For the year through October, GM sold a total of 5,003 Volts.

Experts say that it is now very unlikely that GM will meet its sales goal of 10,000 Volts sold in 2011, but GM predicts increased sales in November over the month of October. The final sales figures for November have not yet been released.

Perhaps the reason for increased sales expectations is Volt customer satisfaction. According to a recent survey by Consumer Reports, Chevrolet Volt owners "love their cars."

The Consumer Reports survey, which was released Thursday, is based on over 314,000 opinions of 2009-2012 model year vehicles. The survey found that 93 percent of Volt owners who participated said they'd buy the EV again.

However, the survey was conducted only a few months after the Volt hit showrooms, and mainly consisted of early buyers and enthusiasts. The survey was also taken before the formal investigation of Volt/lithium battery safety began.

Earlier this year, the Volt underwent a series of tests at a National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) facility in Wisconsin. Three weeks after a side-impact crash test on May 12, the Volt went up in flames while parked at the facility, catching nearby vehicles on fire.

This sparked a NHTSA investigation, where three more Volts were tested November 16, 17 and 18. One battery had normal results while another emitted sparks and smoke, and the third caught on fire one week later. The NHTSA is now conducting a formal investigation of the vehicle's safety.

The Volt may be seeing the upside of a nasty situation for now with a potential sales increase and customer satisfaction, but one GOP lawmaker is looking to throw a wrench in the EV industry's success by fighting the $7,500 tax credit.

Rep. Mike Kelly (R-PA) told Congress Wednesday that he wants the $7,500 tax credit for EVs to cease because he says electric vehicles have not met desired goals and the tax credit only benefits the wealthy. He specifically noted that the annual income of Volt owners is $175,000.

"[The Volt] has become the poster child of President Obama's failed green agenda," said Kelly. "Like many green initiatives promoted by this administration and bankrolled by the American taxpayer, the electric car is better in theory than in practice; has limited consumer demand; is heavily subsidized; and has fallen short of reaching targeted goals. Despite the fact that the federal government has no business subsidizing a product that a manufacturer could just as easily promote through rebates and other buyer incentives, the tax subsidies are largely going to the affluent few who can actually afford to buy an electric car, which costs anywhere between $40,000 and $97,000."

Kelly's "like many other green initiatives promoted by this administration" comment was more than likely referring to this year's Solyndra disaster, where the U.S. government loaned solar panel company Solyndra $535 million in 2009 despite warnings that the company would go bankrupt. Solyndra filed for bankruptcy on September 6, 2011.

Sources: The Detroit News, The Detroit News



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Duh....
By mufdvr3669 on 12/1/2011 12:10:36 PM , Rating: 2
I don't think tax credits are a bad thing to develop an industry, I find it bad taste when said industry is making record profits and still continue to get those tax breaks like big oil. Oil has gotten billions of dollars in tax breaks over many years. It's hard to expect green energy to compete when they have such a disadvantage from the start.


RE: Duh....
By Rajeve on 12/2/2011 9:27:11 AM , Rating: 2
Imagine if at the inception of Apple's I technolgy, if the Government wanted to subsidize that "new technology". Guaranteed if that happened, today we would not have the IPhone, and anything since then out of Apple would have cost so much more than the rest of the phones out there that these phones would need "tax breaks" to get people to buy them! The oil company "tax breaks" you and other Socialists talk about are a misleading phrase. The Govt first raises taxes and "fees" on drilling, transporting etc of the oil company. Let us take this new rate as an example to be 50% of profits. Then they drop the rate to 30% through legistlation or regulations. Then they tell the public (such as yourself) Oh, look, that oil company is getting a 20% tax break, those fat cats! This is the big lie (mostly by Democrats). Last year oil co taxes were in excess of 15 billion. Not to mention, most of our 401Ks are riding on these "oil profits" too!!!


RE: Duh....
By The Raven on 12/5/2011 12:30:45 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
Imagine if at the inception of Apple's I technolgy, if the Government wanted to subsidize that "new technology".
Ever been to a US public school? Gov't grants to buy half baked tech look just like subsidies to me :-P


"Young lady, in this house we obey the laws of thermodynamics!" -- Homer Simpson














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki