AT&T Eyes Deals to Chop up T-Mobile, Amid FCC Scrutiny
November 30, 2011 6:58 PM
comment(s) - last by
Leap would reportedly acquire all T-Mobile's customers increasing its subscription nearly 600 percent
There's been some movement on AT&T, Inc.'s (
seemingly sinking effort
to acquire America's fourth largest carrier, Deutsche Telekom AG's (
) T-Mobile USA.
I. FCC Lashes Out At Proposed Deal
U.S. Federal Communications Commission
(FCC) accepted AT&T's request to retract its filing for approval, after FCC commissioners publicly criticized the deal as being harmful to the public interest and threatened to hold a second trial to halt the merger/acquisition should AT&T escape the
U.S. Department of Justice
effort to block the deal
on antitrust grounds.
But the FCC wasn't done. The agency filed a
[PDF] blasting the merger. It summarizes that the deal would create "... significant harms to competition are likely to result, primarily in the form of increased prices for consumers, reduced incentives for innovation and decreased consumer choice."
The FCC says that an AT&T acquisition of T-Mobile would likely lead to consumer price gouging. [Image Source: Flickr]
The report is critical of math errors (pg. 70) in the AT&T filing, which overstate its benefits significantly. It also calls the companies' claims that the deal would "create" jobs misleading at best. It points to an AT&T memo, which stated that the post-acquisition AT&T would save "[redacted] million per year by eliminating jobs for General and Administrative (‘G&A’) employees." The FCC says that the evidence it saw pointed to net job loss, despite some
minor plans for job creation
This is similar to
our own review of AT&T's filing
, in which we pointed to the fact that AT&T was trying to disguise under a fat pile of paper the fact that cumulative hiring would shrink, leading to a net loss.
AT&T complained about the release, which it called "troubling". AT&T suggests that the release of the report went against standard procedure and should have been put to an official vote. It
The FCC has recognized that it is required by its own rules to dismiss our merger application. This makes all the more troubling their decision to nonetheless release a preliminary staff report on the merger. This report is not an order of the FCC and has never been voted on. It is simply a staff draft that raises questions of fact that were to be addressed in an administrative hearing, a hearing which will not now take place. It has no force or effect under law, which raises questions as to why the FCC would choose to release it. The draft report has also not been made available to AT&T prior to today, so we have had no opportunity to address or rebut its claims, which makes its release all the more improper.
On the other hand, Sprint Nextel Corp. (S), one of the earliest critics of the proposed merger and America's third largest carrier, "applauded" the deal, called its findings "clear", and point to other groups that have drawn similar conclusions.
Today the FCC released the results of its nearly eight month investigation into AT&T's proposed purchase of T-Mobile. FCC Chairman Genachowski and the staff of the Commission have listened to the American consumer. Consumers are best served when competition is allowed to thrive. At Sprint we share this view and applaud today's actions by the FCC.
The investigation's findings are clear: approval of AT&T's bid for T-Mobile would lead to higher prices for consumers, eliminate jobs, harm competition, and dampen innovation across the wireless industry.
These are the same conclusions which led the U.S. Department of Justice and a bi-partisan group of Attorneys General from seven states and Puerto Rico to sue AT&T, Deutsche Telekom and T-Mobile in Federal Court in an effort to block the transaction.
Most importantly, these are the same conclusions reached by tens of thousands of consumers from across the country who have spoken out overwhelmingly against AT&T's proposed takeover of T-Mobile.
Retracting the filing was an important step backwards in the merger process, as FCC approval is required for the merger to succeed. Combined with AT&T's attorney's predicting the deal will fail and taking a preemptive loss on their balance sheet, things look pretty bleak for the deal no matter how much AT&T complains about the FCC report.
II. None of the Numbers Add up in Fishy Reported Deal With Leap
Also of note, a
claims that AT&T -- in perhaps is the company's final effort to save the deal from death -- has proposed a wild scheme under which it would chop up T-Mobile USA's assets, selling most of them to Leap Wireless International, Inc. (
), operators of the Cricket Communicates prepaid U.S. cellular network.
Reportedly Leap would purchase almost all of T-Mobile's USA's customers and the majority of its spectrum rights, which together would total about 40 percent of the $39B USD purchase. AT&T would presumably keep the network infrastructure, selling service to Leap. Leap, on the other hand, might lease some of its spectrum to AT&T.
There's reason for federal regulators to be wary of the deal. Leap currently has around 5.8 million U.S. subscribers [
], but would be trying to swallow T-Mobile USA's roughly 34 million subscribers [
More baffling still is where Leap is getting the money to pay for "40 percent of T-Mobile USA’s asset (
). That would be $15.6B USD of the total $39B USD cost of the deal. To put that number in perspective, while Leap is profitable, its total 2010
(not profit) was $2.69B USD. Where it's conjuring up what would amount to multiple decades of its profits at current levels is a pretty compelling question.
Biting off more that you can chew: it would be outlandish for Leap to acquire T-Mobile, a company with nearly six times as many subscribers. [Image Source: National Geographic]
AT&T and Verizon Wireless (a joint venture between Verizon Communications, Inc. (
) and Vodafone Group Plc. (
)) today own two thirds of a market through a
mergers, acquisitions, and splits
that have reduced competition in the market.
In that regard a "joint" deal with Leap may really be a deal propped up by AT&T for the sake of giving it a foothold in the T-Mobile USA network and quietly acquire Leap and/or the rest of T-Mobile USA's assets once scrutiny died down and regulatory conditions allowed it to do so.
Of course it's possible
sources were somehow misinformed and this "deal" doesn't really exist.
The Wall Street Journal
an alternate deal
that may see Deutsche Telekom and AT&T entering into a joint venture to "save" T-Mobile USA. Details of what this alternative to a full acquisition might entail are hazy at best.
This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled
RE: What's with the desperation?
12/1/2011 11:02:11 AM
Uhhh...here in NY, Cablevision is doing a good job competiting. Granted, FIOS is better, but Cablevision is nothing to sneeze at.
Heck, up here, Cablevision and Verizion are fighting an all out war, which is reducing prices on everyone. Guess thats why they want T-mobile out of the equation...
RE: What's with the desperation?
12/1/2011 11:14:02 AM
It depends on where you are in NY. Cablevision is good, but you don't have cellular service from Cablevision. If you go upstate, or even out to the east end of Long Island, AT&T service has a lot of coverage issues.
Now, that is what all of this is about from AT&T, closing those coverage holes, and the local governments tend to prevent new cell phone towers from being built, so you can't even say it is the fault of AT&T for not putting up towers, it's the local governments.
So, what is AT&T to do if they can't get access to cell phone towers? That is what this is really about, and Verizon doesn't want to see AT&T get access to new towers as well. Sprint on the other hand, can at least say that they are not in last place for the national carriers when T-mobile is still around.
Now, there is also the issue where since Verizon has all those COs for POTS phone service, they can use that SUBSIDIZED equipment to help their cellular service, and that is where I see a problem with the government saying anything about the industry. If there were an audit of Verizon, I BET you could find clear evidence that much of the money that was given by the government really went to improving the cellular network.
T-mobile has virtually no service in many places, and if you read around, you would see that T-mobile is living on borrowed time because their parent company wants to get rid of it. Now, if the parent company of T-mobile wants to get rid of it, then can you say that a merger with AT&T is actually reducing competition, when the company will be gone anyway in a few years?
"I'm an Internet expert too. It's all right to wire the industrial zone only, but there are many problems if other regions of the North are wired." -- North Korean Supreme Commander Kim Jong-il
AT&T Indicates T-Mobile Acquisition Likely to Fail, Takes $4B Charge
November 24, 2011, 11:08 AM
Apple's Jobs Wanted Private Wi-Fi Network for iPhone, Tried for Three Years
November 16, 2011, 11:44 AM
AT&T Fights DOJ to Engulf T-Mobile, Gain U.S. Monopoly on GSM
September 2, 2011, 11:22 AM
DOJ Files Paperwork to Kill AT&T/T-Mobile Merger; AT&T, Sprint Respond
August 31, 2011, 11:21 AM
AT&T Promises to Bring 5,000 Jobs Back to U.S. If T-Mobile Deal is Approved
August 31, 2011, 10:05 AM
Retiree Sues Apple For $7,500 for Wiping Honeymoon Photos From His iPhone
November 30, 2015, 10:23 AM
iPhone 7 May Pack 3-4 GB Memory, More Storage; 4-Inch Comeback is Rumored
November 20, 2015, 10:12 PM
OnePlus One, OnePlus 2 Will Receive Android Marshmallow in Q1 2016
November 16, 2015, 9:58 AM
Lenovo Whoa: Motorola Droid MAXX 2 and Turbo 2 Break Cover in Leaks
October 26, 2015, 3:12 PM
Leak: Apple Preps for First Real Android App Foray With New Apple Music App
October 24, 2015, 1:59 PM
Pepsi Smartphone? Empty Calories Coming Soon to the Midrange
October 12, 2015, 11:41 PM
Latest Blog Posts
Sceptre Airs 27", 120 Hz. 1080p Monitor/HDTV w/ 5 ms Response Time for $220
Dec 3, 2014, 10:32 PM
Costco Gives Employees Thanksgiving Off; Wal-Mart Leads "Black Thursday" Charge
Oct 29, 2014, 9:57 PM
"Bear Selfies" Fad Could Turn Deadly, Warn Nevada Wildlife Officials
Oct 28, 2014, 12:00 PM
The Surface Mini That Was Never Released Gets "Hands On" Treatment
Sep 26, 2014, 8:22 AM
ISIS Imposes Ban on Teaching Evolution in Iraq
Sep 17, 2014, 5:22 PM
More Blog Posts
Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. -
Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information