AT&T Eyes Deals to Chop up T-Mobile, Amid FCC Scrutiny
November 30, 2011 6:58 PM
comment(s) - last by
Leap would reportedly acquire all T-Mobile's customers increasing its subscription nearly 600 percent
There's been some movement on AT&T, Inc.'s (
seemingly sinking effort
to acquire America's fourth largest carrier, Deutsche Telekom AG's (
) T-Mobile USA.
I. FCC Lashes Out At Proposed Deal
U.S. Federal Communications Commission
(FCC) accepted AT&T's request to retract its filing for approval, after FCC commissioners publicly criticized the deal as being harmful to the public interest and threatened to hold a second trial to halt the merger/acquisition should AT&T escape the
U.S. Department of Justice
effort to block the deal
on antitrust grounds.
But the FCC wasn't done. The agency filed a
[PDF] blasting the merger. It summarizes that the deal would create "... significant harms to competition are likely to result, primarily in the form of increased prices for consumers, reduced incentives for innovation and decreased consumer choice."
The FCC says that an AT&T acquisition of T-Mobile would likely lead to consumer price gouging. [Image Source: Flickr]
The report is critical of math errors (pg. 70) in the AT&T filing, which overstate its benefits significantly. It also calls the companies' claims that the deal would "create" jobs misleading at best. It points to an AT&T memo, which stated that the post-acquisition AT&T would save "[redacted] million per year by eliminating jobs for General and Administrative (‘G&A’) employees." The FCC says that the evidence it saw pointed to net job loss, despite some
minor plans for job creation
This is similar to
our own review of AT&T's filing
, in which we pointed to the fact that AT&T was trying to disguise under a fat pile of paper the fact that cumulative hiring would shrink, leading to a net loss.
AT&T complained about the release, which it called "troubling". AT&T suggests that the release of the report went against standard procedure and should have been put to an official vote. It
The FCC has recognized that it is required by its own rules to dismiss our merger application. This makes all the more troubling their decision to nonetheless release a preliminary staff report on the merger. This report is not an order of the FCC and has never been voted on. It is simply a staff draft that raises questions of fact that were to be addressed in an administrative hearing, a hearing which will not now take place. It has no force or effect under law, which raises questions as to why the FCC would choose to release it. The draft report has also not been made available to AT&T prior to today, so we have had no opportunity to address or rebut its claims, which makes its release all the more improper.
On the other hand, Sprint Nextel Corp. (S), one of the earliest critics of the proposed merger and America's third largest carrier, "applauded" the deal, called its findings "clear", and point to other groups that have drawn similar conclusions.
Today the FCC released the results of its nearly eight month investigation into AT&T's proposed purchase of T-Mobile. FCC Chairman Genachowski and the staff of the Commission have listened to the American consumer. Consumers are best served when competition is allowed to thrive. At Sprint we share this view and applaud today's actions by the FCC.
The investigation's findings are clear: approval of AT&T's bid for T-Mobile would lead to higher prices for consumers, eliminate jobs, harm competition, and dampen innovation across the wireless industry.
These are the same conclusions which led the U.S. Department of Justice and a bi-partisan group of Attorneys General from seven states and Puerto Rico to sue AT&T, Deutsche Telekom and T-Mobile in Federal Court in an effort to block the transaction.
Most importantly, these are the same conclusions reached by tens of thousands of consumers from across the country who have spoken out overwhelmingly against AT&T's proposed takeover of T-Mobile.
Retracting the filing was an important step backwards in the merger process, as FCC approval is required for the merger to succeed. Combined with AT&T's attorney's predicting the deal will fail and taking a preemptive loss on their balance sheet, things look pretty bleak for the deal no matter how much AT&T complains about the FCC report.
II. None of the Numbers Add up in Fishy Reported Deal With Leap
Also of note, a
claims that AT&T -- in perhaps is the company's final effort to save the deal from death -- has proposed a wild scheme under which it would chop up T-Mobile USA's assets, selling most of them to Leap Wireless International, Inc. (
), operators of the Cricket Communicates prepaid U.S. cellular network.
Reportedly Leap would purchase almost all of T-Mobile's USA's customers and the majority of its spectrum rights, which together would total about 40 percent of the $39B USD purchase. AT&T would presumably keep the network infrastructure, selling service to Leap. Leap, on the other hand, might lease some of its spectrum to AT&T.
There's reason for federal regulators to be wary of the deal. Leap currently has around 5.8 million U.S. subscribers [
], but would be trying to swallow T-Mobile USA's roughly 34 million subscribers [
More baffling still is where Leap is getting the money to pay for "40 percent of T-Mobile USA’s asset (
). That would be $15.6B USD of the total $39B USD cost of the deal. To put that number in perspective, while Leap is profitable, its total 2010
(not profit) was $2.69B USD. Where it's conjuring up what would amount to multiple decades of its profits at current levels is a pretty compelling question.
Biting off more that you can chew: it would be outlandish for Leap to acquire T-Mobile, a company with nearly six times as many subscribers. [Image Source: National Geographic]
AT&T and Verizon Wireless (a joint venture between Verizon Communications, Inc. (
) and Vodafone Group Plc. (
)) today own two thirds of a market through a
mergers, acquisitions, and splits
that have reduced competition in the market.
In that regard a "joint" deal with Leap may really be a deal propped up by AT&T for the sake of giving it a foothold in the T-Mobile USA network and quietly acquire Leap and/or the rest of T-Mobile USA's assets once scrutiny died down and regulatory conditions allowed it to do so.
Of course it's possible
sources were somehow misinformed and this "deal" doesn't really exist.
The Wall Street Journal
an alternate deal
that may see Deutsche Telekom and AT&T entering into a joint venture to "save" T-Mobile USA. Details of what this alternative to a full acquisition might entail are hazy at best.
This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled
Something smells fishy
11/30/2011 9:58:16 PM
If AT&T were to chop up T-Mobile why wouldn't they sell it to Sprint who already showed interest in T-mobile when they placed a bid to buy them out before AT&T out bid them. Sounds like AT&T is either trying to slowly acquire T-mobile as Jason points out in the article or trying to keep Sprint from gaining market share keeping T-mobile's customers away from Sprint.
RE: Something smells fishy
11/30/2011 10:55:44 PM
probably because att would not see any 'threat' by having some small, crappy company grow a little larger, whereas a larger company like sprint would have more to gain, and thus be more of a threat to att.
"If you mod me down, I will become more insightful than you can possibly imagine." -- Slashdot
AT&T Indicates T-Mobile Acquisition Likely to Fail, Takes $4B Charge
November 24, 2011, 11:08 AM
Apple's Jobs Wanted Private Wi-Fi Network for iPhone, Tried for Three Years
November 16, 2011, 11:44 AM
AT&T Fights DOJ to Engulf T-Mobile, Gain U.S. Monopoly on GSM
September 2, 2011, 11:22 AM
DOJ Files Paperwork to Kill AT&T/T-Mobile Merger; AT&T, Sprint Respond
August 31, 2011, 11:21 AM
AT&T Promises to Bring 5,000 Jobs Back to U.S. If T-Mobile Deal is Approved
August 31, 2011, 10:05 AM
Inspiron Laptops & 2-in-1 PCs
September 25, 2016, 9:00 AM
The Samsung Galaxy S7
September 14, 2016, 6:00 AM
Apple Watch 2 – Coming September 7th
September 3, 2016, 6:30 AM
Apple says “See you on the 7th.”
September 1, 2016, 6:30 AM
Apple sued because of iPhone 6 Touch Disease
August 31, 2016, 7:00 AM
Get Ready to wait in line – iPhone 7 due September.
August 18, 2016, 7:15 AM
Most Popular Articles
5 Cases for iPhone 7 and 7 iPhone Plus
September 18, 2016, 10:08 AM
Laptop or Tablet - Which Do You Prefer?
September 20, 2016, 6:32 AM
Update: Samsung Exchange Program Now in Progress
September 20, 2016, 5:30 AM
Smartphone Screen Protectors – What To Look For
September 21, 2016, 9:33 AM
Walmart may get "Robot Shopping Carts?"
September 17, 2016, 6:01 AM
Latest Blog Posts
Who is in Risk of Getting Oral Cancer?
Sep 23, 2016, 6:02 AM
France Bans Plastic Eating Utensils in Restaurants
Sep 18, 2016, 10:49 AM
Progress Against Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Sep 17, 2016, 5:30 AM
Apple Watch Series 2 - Number 1 in the Customer Satisfaction.
Sep 7, 2016, 6:19 PM
First Self-Driving Car debut on the streets of Singapore
Aug 28, 2016, 4:10 PM
More Blog Posts
Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. -
Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information