backtop


Print 48 comment(s) - last by hexxthalion.. on Nov 24 at 1:11 PM


  (Source: wikipeers.com)
The European Commission is concerned that other firms could mimic Apple and Samsung's patent war and lead to the unfair use of intellectual property rights against rivals

Much of Apple and Samsung's 2011 has been spent duking it out over patents. Apple initially went after Samsung earlier this year and accused it of copying Apple's products when creating its Galaxy line of smartphones and tablets. Now, the European Commission is concerned that other firms could mimic Apple and Samsung's patent war and lead to the unfair use of intellectual property rights against rivals.

Throughout the year, Apple and Samsung have gone back and forth with patent issues. Apple claimed that Samsung created its Galaxy line such as the Galaxy Tab 10.1 by ripping off Apple's design. Apple succeeded in killing Samsung's Australian tablet sales, banned the Galaxy Tab 10.1 in Germany, and sought to ban Samsung's phones and Android tablets in Britain. But Samsung did some retaliating of its own by filing a 3G lawsuit against Apple in France, looking to ban iPhone 5 sales (back before it was revealed that the anticipated iPhone 5 was really the iPhone 4S), and modifying its hardware and software to prevent further lawsuits.

Earlier this month, the European Commission started looking into FRAND (fair, reasonable, and non-discriminatory) violations associated with the Apple/Samsung patent war. Now, the EU's latest concern has to do with the potential misuse of patents in other areas of the IT sector. 

"We requested information from both Apple and Samsung," said Joaquin Almunia, EU Competition Commissioner. "We have not yet received the answers. We need to look at this because IP rights can be used as a distortion of competition but we will need to look at the answers.

"In particular, in the IT sector, it is obvious it is not the only case. Apple and Samsung is only one case where IP rights can be used as an instrument to restrict competition. Standardization and IP rights are two instruments that in this new IT sector can be used as a tool to abuse."

Source: Reuters



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Google same game since 2001
By drycrust3 on 11/23/2011 2:46:36 AM , Rating: 3
quote:
Google is the only company to have a competing OS ready in such a short window, it is obvious they had someone inside Apple leaking information.

Android was released under open source licences from 21 October, 2008 until March 2011. If there was any code in it that was copied from iOS then not only could Apple have checked to see if Android breached copyright, I'm quite sure they would have found it and sued Google (or whoever) for breaching copyright. Since Apple haven't complained about breaches of copyright, then it stands to reason the code in Android wasn't ever sourced from Apple.
In regards to taking such a short time to write your own OS, since Android was released under an open source licence, and since it claims to have used the Linux 2.6 kernel, then it stands to reason that there were other components in it that were also obtained from the open source community, thus it is quite understandable for the development time to be much shorter than if Google set out to write their own OS (by about several thousand man years). As I understand GPL Licencing, there isn't anything illegal about Google doing this, and since Google regularly contribute to the Linux community, one can argue it is a fair exchange.


"A lot of people pay zero for the cellphone ... That's what it's worth." -- Apple Chief Operating Officer Timothy Cook














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki