UPDATED: Fed's Proposed 54.5 MPG CAFE Requirements for 2017-2025 Released
November 16, 2011 4:30 PM
comment(s) - last by
President Obama admires a Chevrolet Volt
(Source: Motor City Times)
Proposed standards are expected to be the same Washington and automakers agreed to last summer
The White House, California, and major automakers have came to an agreement on proposed economy standards that will see the requirements ultimately nearly double
fleet wide fuel economy to 54.5 mpg by 2025
People against the plan in the auto industry and Washington have argued that the 54.5 mpg goal will mean
additional money added to the price of each vehicle
and the loss of jobs in the auto industry due to reduced sales. Some estimates from Washington peg the cost to the automotive industry to meet the proposed standards at as much as $100 billion.
The proposed 54.5 mpg standard would save customers $6,600 in lifetime fuel costs for a 2025 model year vehicle. The Department of Transportation (DOT) and Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), however, rightly point out that the actual savings is closer to $4,400 when you take into account the additional cost of the technology needed (as reflected by the sticker price of the car) to make cars reach such lofty mileage numbers.
"These unprecedented standards are a remarkable leap forward in improving fuel efficiency. We expect this program will not only save consumers money, it will ensure automakers have the regulatory certainty they need to make key decisions that create jobs and invest in the future," said U.S. Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood. "We are pleased that we've been able to work with the auto industry, the states, and leaders in the environmental and labor communities to move toward even tougher standards for the second phase of the President's national program to improve fuel economy and reduce pollution."
"This is an important addition to the landmark clean cars program that President Obama initiated to establish fuel economy standards more than two years ago," added EPA Administrator Lisa P. Jackson. "The progress we made with the help of the auto industry, the environmental community, consumer groups and others will be expanded upon in the years to come -- benefitting the health, the environment and the economy for the American people."
A letter sent to President Obama this week from 100 House Democrats praised the new standards writing, "[The new efficiency standards] increase our national and economic security in an unprecedented way by dramatically decreasing our dependence on foreign sources of petroleum."
The following are areas targeted for improving fuel efficiency across the board:
More efficient gasoline engines
Greater availability of diesel engines for passenger cars
Improvements in vehicle aerodynamics
Reduced vehicle weight thanks to the use of aluminum and composites
Low rolling resistance tires
Improved air conditioning systems
More efficient vehicle accessories
The rules offered up today are not final; there is still a period for the industry and consumers to make comment on the rules. Administration official in Washington said recently that cars would have to average 62 mpg and light trucks 44 mpg to meet the economy standards of 54.5 mpg by 2025. The EPA estimates that real world driving would see 39 mpg.
Some in Washington have already argued that the new fuel economy proposal will legislate out of existence the cars on the market today selling for under $15,000. Obama and his administration still claim that the new standards will save consumers $1.7 trillion in fuel over the life of the vehicles on the road. That figure is contested and some fear that automakers will be forced to build vehicles
consumers aren't interested
in to meet the economy standards.
Updated 11/16/2011 @ 4:30pm to reflect official announcement and add quotes.
The Detroit News
This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled
RE: Doesn't make sense
11/20/2011 1:46:19 PM
The numbers are all crap, but considering the hidden costs of motor fuel to society (the money spent securing sources of oil, environmental issues, pollution issues, time waste from traffic and congestion, etc) it's more likely that the opposite is true.
I've posted this before and I still believe it - if motor fuel was taxed more heavily (increasing in slow increments) and offset by a decrease in payroll taxes, the country would be much, much better off.
"Can anyone tell me what MobileMe is supposed to do?... So why the f*** doesn't it do that?" -- Steve Jobs
Republicans Try to Block 54.5 MPG CAFE Standard
October 21, 2011, 1:11 PM
Chrysler CEO Says He is Being Forced to Go Hybrid to Meet 2025 CAFE Standards
October 20, 2011, 1:20 PM
Report Claims Cost to Hit 62 MPG by 2025 Would Add $10K to New Vehicles
June 15, 2011, 1:34 PM
Ford, Toyota, and Universal Pictures Celebrate "Back to the Future Day' in Style
October 21, 2015, 4:19 PM
Consumer Reports Flexes Muscle, Hits Slumping Tesla Motors Stock
October 20, 2015, 4:13 PM
Debunked: Beneath the Lies, Nigerian "Pee Generator" Is Still Pissing Into the Wind
October 19, 2015, 7:53 PM
Hot Air? President Obama, G7 Pledge to Eliminate Most Fossil Fuel Use by 2100
June 8, 2015, 5:40 PM
Study Predicts Self-Driving Vehicles Could Rake in Billions
March 6, 2015, 8:34 AM
Dual-Motor Tesla Model S P85D's "Insane Mode" Shocks Passengers
January 28, 2015, 11:18 PM
Latest Blog Posts
Sceptre Airs 27", 120 Hz. 1080p Monitor/HDTV w/ 5 ms Response Time for $220
Dec 3, 2014, 10:32 PM
Costco Gives Employees Thanksgiving Off; Wal-Mart Leads "Black Thursday" Charge
Oct 29, 2014, 9:57 PM
"Bear Selfies" Fad Could Turn Deadly, Warn Nevada Wildlife Officials
Oct 28, 2014, 12:00 PM
The Surface Mini That Was Never Released Gets "Hands On" Treatment
Sep 26, 2014, 8:22 AM
ISIS Imposes Ban on Teaching Evolution in Iraq
Sep 17, 2014, 5:22 PM
More Blog Posts
Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. -
Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information