Print 37 comment(s) - last by YashBudini.. on Nov 2 at 2:33 PM

Beacon Power received a nearly $43 million loan guarantee from the government in August 2010

The Solyndra failure has put alternative energy loans in a negative light as of late, and now the financial failure of yet another renewable energy company is here to add insult to injury. Beacon Power has claimed bankruptcy after receiving government loans as well.

Beacon Power, which creates flywheels to store power and increase grid efficiency by preventing blackouts, filed for bankruptcy protection on Sunday. The company received a nearly $43 million loan guarantee from the Department of Energy in August 2010.

More specifically, Beacon Power owes the Department of Energy $39.1 million and the state of Massachusetts $3.45 million. It received these loans because its technology was seen as aiding grid reliability.

Rep. Cliff Stearns (R-FL), who is leading the recent Solyndra investigation, was quick to attack the Department of Energy with its decision to give not just one bad alternative energy loan, but now two.

"This latest failure is a sharp reminder that DOE has fallen well short of delivering the stimulus jobs that were promised," said Stearns. "Now taxpayers find themselves millions of more dollars in the hole."

The Department of Energy defended its position with Beacon Power, saying that unlike Solyndra, Beacon Power has an operational facility in Stephentown, New York. Solyndra may have closed down completely the day it claimed bankruptcy, but Beacon Power has long term contracts with the Stephentown facility as well as cash reserves, which can be used to pay the government back.

"Protecting taxpayer dollars remains the top priority for Secretary [Stephen] Chu and the Department, which is why we were careful to include many protections for the taxpayer in the loan guarantee for the Stephentown project," said Damien LaVere, DOE spokesman.

While analysts such as Walter Nasde of Ardour Capital believe Beacon Power's technology was a good idea, CNN reports that the company couldn't survive due to the low rates that the government put in place for utilities. In other words, Beacon Power couldn't charge utilities any more than the rates the government set, and it wasn't enough to keep Beacon Power alive.

The low price of natural gas for generating additional power, its failure to attract investors, and an issue with one of its flywheels in July were also listed as nails in Beacon Power's coffin. In addition, Beacon Power's shares, which were down to $3.44 at the end of February and were recently at below $1 a share, led to a notification from NASDAQ that Beacon would be delisted. The company's shares traded for as much as $47.40 in 2005, but closed Monday at 10.7 cents a share, which gives Beacon Power a market value of $3 million.

"The current economic and political climate, the financing terms mandated by DOE, and Beacon's recent delisting notice from NASDAQ have together severely restricted Beacon's access to additional investments through the equity markets," said Beacon Power CEO William Capp.

Beacon Power's revenues from the Stephentown plant were $525,000 in Q2 2011.

Back in September, Capp described the government's role in supporting the construction of the Stephentown plant, and how it would have been impossible without the loan.

"We absolutely couldn't have done it without support from the government, because no one was willing to do it," said Capp. "The projects are so huge, that's the problem. If you demonstrate an energy technology on a grid scale, that's $100 million."

The Beacon Power bankruptcy echoes Solyndra's recent failure, which is a solar panel manufacturer that received $535 million in loan guarantees back in 2009. Solyndra filed for bankruptcy two months ago, and there is an investigation looking into whether DOE properly assessed the risks before giving the loan and whether the Obama administration was pushing the loan despite risks in order to meet political deadlines.

Sources: CNN, Washington Post,

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Just give me back my tax money
By Beenthere on 11/1/2011 10:49:13 AM , Rating: 2
This ain't Bama's money they are pissing away nor the DOE's money, it's my tax money. Just give me back my tax money and stop giving out bad loans. I'm sure these companies filing bankruptcy will still find enough money to make significant financial political contributions to the criminals on Corruption Hill.

RE: Just give me back my tax money
By Shig on 11/1/11, Rating: 0
By Beenthere on 11/1/2011 11:42:02 AM , Rating: 1
If you want to allow the Gov. to piss away your money that's fine with me, but they don't have my permission to piss away my tax dollars. I fully agree that the banks, oil industry and many other entities are criminal and should not receive our tax dollars, tax breaks, etc. but that does not make the $550 million pissed away on two bad loads acceptable to me. Just give me back my tax money and the Gov. can do whatever they chose with YOUR money. <LOL>

RE: Just give me back my tax money
By FITCamaro on 11/1/2011 12:37:01 PM , Rating: 2
You have new fees on your checking account because of the Dodd-Frank financial reform bill that, amongst other things, limited how much banks can charge retailers per transactions for debit cards.

You have no one to blame but them. And the banks warned of it happening. Of course now Chris Dodd is yelling at Bank of America for doing exactly what it said would happen.

RE: Just give me back my tax money
By FITCamaro on 11/1/2011 12:40:03 PM , Rating: 1
And I use the words "financial reform" very loosely. That bill did nothing but screw over consumers. Especially responsible ones.

Just wait until credit card interest rates skyrocket in 2013 due to parts of that bill.

RE: Just give me back my tax money
By YashBudini on 11/1/2011 9:29:15 PM , Rating: 1
If you're doing business with a major bank you should expect to get screwed. They change the rules on a regular basis. The fee-du-jour is what I call it.

Still bank with them? It's your own damn fault.

RE: Just give me back my tax money
By JediJeb on 11/2/2011 9:53:00 AM , Rating: 2
That is why I only use a small local bank. They still charge no fees even if you use another banks Debit card in their ATM. You will however be charged that banks fee if you use it there.

By YashBudini on 11/2/2011 10:48:54 AM , Rating: 2
My ex-bank started charging me $20 a year for their free ATM card. I closed my account. The bank manager tried to keep me there but failed. I said, "You seem frustrated, welcome to my world."

I never make debit card purchases.

By Dr of crap on 11/1/2011 12:39:38 PM , Rating: 1
Yeah I like my tax money being GIVEN to companies that don't have a solid footing and then the money is lost.
GREAT plan.

If I got money like that - I'd be able to pay it back with interest ( small interest it would be, but interest).
I'm a WAY better risk than these companies the govt chooses!

"I modded down, down, down, and the flames went higher." -- Sven Olsen

Copyright 2015 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki