Print 37 comment(s) - last by Keeir.. on Oct 31 at 2:29 PM

The $96,000 Fisker Karma is an exotic luxury sedan with a length of 16.5 feet, a width that surpasses 6 feet, a weight of over 2.5 tons, and it has a 403-horsepower powerplant

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) recently gave the Fisker Karma hybrid a lower-than-expected 52 mpg-equivalent rating in combined city and highway driving. The massive weight of the Karma was blamed for the poor EPA rating, and now, the EPA has determined that the 2012 Fisker Karma range-extended plug-in hybrid is a subcompact.

The $96,000 Fisker Karma is an exotic luxury sedan with a length of 16.5 feet and a width that surpasses 6 feet. It's weight is over 2.5 tons, and it has a 403-horsepower electric powerplant. So why did the EPA categorize it as a subcompact? The interior volume of the Karma doesn't quite make the cutoff of 100 cubic-feet that distinguishes between a compact and a subcompact.

The auto industry typically uses overall length to determine the class of a vehicle, but the EPA uses interior volume to do so. This means that the Karma cannot be compared to other hybrids such as Chevrolet's Volt range-extended plug-in hybrid because it's considered a compact vehicle. The Prius is classified as a midsize.

Fisker said the classification of the Karma wouldn’t affect sales because those willing to spend $96,000 on the car "know what they are getting." Fisker also called the EPA's fuel economy rating the "worst case scenario," and still insists that the Karma will provide 50 miles on a single charge.

Another Fisker employee was a bit more annoyed with the EPA rating and subcompact classification, saying that comparing the Karma to other subcompacts like the Chevy Sonic "gives you a good idea of how much faith you should put in these fuel economy ratings."

The 52 mpg-equivalent rated by the EPA includes 32 miles of all-electric range and 20 mpg when its gasoline engine/generator kicks in to provide electricity once the battery pack is drained.

Source: Auto Observer

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: LOL...
By Suntan on 10/28/2011 10:58:48 AM , Rating: 2
Nobody is buying this car for its fuel efficiency. Or its total cost of ownership.

If they are, they are idiots.

In any case, the only thing the EPA figures matter for is blog-fodder.


RE: LOL...
By kjboughton on 10/28/2011 11:03:09 AM , Rating: 2
Captain Obvious has spoken.

RE: LOL...
By Suntan on 10/28/2011 11:05:23 AM , Rating: 2
Are you that guy I did that to the other day? Minutes after I posted too, no less. Hold a grudge much stalker?


RE: LOL...
By Flunk on 10/28/2011 11:09:47 AM , Rating: 5
Your name is in the by line, you don't need to type it at the end of every message.

-Some D-Bag!

RE: LOL...
By ebakke on 10/28/2011 11:28:15 AM , Rating: 2
Such hostility in the forums today.

RE: LOL...
By Spuke on 10/28/2011 12:04:52 PM , Rating: 2
Such hostility in the forums today.
Yeah, and it's still early.

RE: LOL...
By Brandon Hill on 10/28/2011 12:16:16 PM , Rating: 4
I know, FitCamaro and Reclaimer haven't even gotten here yet ;)

RE: LOL...
By lelias2k on 10/28/2011 1:15:36 PM , Rating: 2
You took the keys out of my hands... :)

RE: LOL...
By topkill on 10/28/2011 9:37:07 PM , Rating: 1
LOL Reading comments on DT is like watching two ethnic gangs trying to kill each other and then follow it up by blaming each other for all the worlds ills.

Both sides hate each other and spend hours a day trolling on here so they can spew vile shit at back and forth.

RE: LOL...
By Bad-Karma on 10/29/2011 4:54:33 AM , Rating: 3
A forum where people post about their disagreement......

Darn, and I hoped it was more like the Sharks and the Jets snapping their fingers at each other all the while doing choreographed dance.

RE: LOL...
By Ryrod on 10/29/2011 5:57:35 PM , Rating: 2
It's not so much the disagreement that people dislike, but the personal attacks that appear in the comments. I have no problem with people telling me I am wrong and presenting facts to back up their statement.

However, people are far too prone to play internet tough guy and call others idiots, stupid, and words far worse that the FCC doesn't even allow on television. Now, I'm an adult and can handle seeing the words, but far too often, that's the entirety of a post. It kinda ends the conversation when the only thing in the responding post is "You're f***ing stupid." How can you really address that besides saying "No, I'm not"?

RE: LOL...
By Ryrod on 10/29/2011 3:58:06 AM , Rating: 2
Of all the things I've seen said on DT over the past week, this is definitely top and deserves a +6. I couldn't stop laughing. Thanks for making my day.

"There's no chance that the iPhone is going to get any significant market share. No chance." -- Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer

Most Popular ArticlesAre you ready for this ? HyperDrive Aircraft
September 24, 2016, 9:29 AM
Leaked – Samsung S8 is a Dream and a Dream 2
September 25, 2016, 8:00 AM
Inspiron Laptops & 2-in-1 PCs
September 25, 2016, 9:00 AM
Snapchat’s New Sunglasses are a Spectacle – No Pun Intended
September 24, 2016, 9:02 AM
Walmart may get "Robot Shopping Carts?"
September 17, 2016, 6:01 AM

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki