Print 102 comment(s) - last by ClownPuncher.. on Nov 1 at 12:27 PM

Land line subsidies to die completely in 2020, broadband fee and subsidy system kicks in next year

The federal government's effort to expand communications to impoverished and rural Americans is shifting gears from phone lines to broadband.  The U.S. Federal Communications Commission have approved a new plan and a new set of rules that will revamp the way taxes are used to improve communications in the U.S.

I. "Bye Bye" Land Line, "Hello" Broadband

The new rules revamp the Universal Service Fund (USF), a government fund financed by a 10 percent government fee (tax) on phone lines (cell phones, land lines) in the U.S.  The USF was first created as part of a broad package of telephone and internet reforms passed in the Telecommunications Act of 1996, which was signed into law by President Bill Clinton (D).

Under the Obama adminstration's plan, the estimated $8B USD the USF pulls in annually from U.S. taxpayers is being redirected.  The plan, approved by the FCC this week will eventually throw out the old subsidies on poor, rural Americans' phone service.

In its place will be two plans, aimed at bringing more modern communications technologies to these folks.  The first is the "Connect America Fund", which will direct $4.5B USD annually to funding mobile phone and broadband service to rural areas.  The services will only cover areas that private businesses refuse to cover.

American coverage
Much of America [orange] is not covered by what the FCC defines as high-speed internet (3 Mbps down; 768 kbps up). [Source: FCC]

A second fund, "The Mobility Fund", will get $500M USD.  This fund will focus its efforts on spreading wireless internet.

The plan was approved by a unanimous 4-0 vote, with FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski calling the plan "a momentous step in our efforts to harness the benefits of broadband for every American."

The plan is expected to provide service 7 million Americans over the next six years, and create 500,000 high-tech jobs, keeping America viable in a "fiercely competitive" global economy.

II. Some Warn Broadband Bills Will Go Up, FCC Says They Won't

The fly in the ointment may be higher bills.  Until 2017, the fees supporting USF will still be in effect, and the government will be funding the CAF and Mobility Fund from additional fees on broadband.

Public Knowledge, an advocacy group, warns, "[W]e share the concerns of other consumer organizations that the Commission's actions will lead to higher prices at a time when the average American is watching every penny."

Generally, while mobile service providers are pleased with the plan (which may give them funding for network expansion), broadband providers are irrate.

But the FCC's three Democratic comissioners, and the loan Republican commissioner were unilateral in insisting consumer bills will not, on average, increase.  They say that their plan counteracts the extra broadband fee by eliminate some of the network of confusing subsidies and kickbacks on broadband and phone service.  As  a result, these cuts will create enough of a price cut to absorb the new fee, they say.

Comments Republican Commissioner Robert McDowell, who endorsed the plan, "For the vast majority of consumers, rates should decline or stay the same."

Robert McDowell
Robert McDowell, the FCC's sole Republican commissioner spoke for some in his party in supporting the plan. [Source: C-Span]

Democratic FCC Chairman Genachowski adds, "I don't expect that overall consumer rates will go up as a result of this."

The plan will go into effect this year, with funds being put to use between 2012 and 2016.  Between 2017 and 2020, the USF will be discontinued and rural areas will stop receiving subsidies to keep their phone land lines alive.

The government playing utility is a role that troubles some, but it's an issue complicated by the fact that there's almost 10 million Americans living in regions that the private sector refuses to cover.  Thus, there should be plenty of lively debate on this topic.

Sources: FCC, Public Knowledge

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Gov't Subsidized Broadband? No Thank You.
By The Raven on 10/28/2011 4:27:39 PM , Rating: 2
Yeah those people out in rural areas are real worried about staying globally competitive buddy.

RE: Gov't Subsidized Broadband? No Thank You.
By cjohnson2136 on 10/28/2011 4:30:49 PM , Rating: 2
Now wait a second I am one of those people that used to live out in rural areas. And yes they do want to stay connected but sometimes the cost of owning a home is so much cheaper in the rural areas

RE: Gov't Subsidized Broadband? No Thank You.
By The Raven on 10/31/2011 2:37:19 AM , Rating: 2
Not that cheap when you have to pay out the yinyang for broadband is it? Stay in the city if you have a problem with that.

RE: Gov't Subsidized Broadband? No Thank You.
By cjohnson2136 on 10/31/2011 9:56:55 AM , Rating: 2
No cause the city is just as expensive compared to where I lived in the rural area.

By The Raven on 10/31/2011 4:47:33 PM , Rating: 2
So what is your point? It is just as expensive in the city as the country? I pay 2x ($60) as much for broadband (granted it is faster because that is the point were I could justify the higher cost lol long story) but I pay 25% ($200) less for rent. And my commute is 75% (30 min) shorter. So why exactly do I need the federal gov't pushing cheap broadband out to the sticks for? I made the decision to move out there knowing all of these basic variables.

If you are stupid enough to move out to Yosemite and live in a trailer expecting dirt cheap broadband...I don't think that we should be counting on you being an asset to the US economy.

RE: Gov't Subsidized Broadband? No Thank You.
By StanO360 on 10/28/2011 4:36:32 PM , Rating: 1
And specifically how does the government taking my money and giving to someone that lives in an area so rural it doesn't have DSL, Wi-Fi, Satellite or any broadband access, make our country more "competitive"?

RE: Gov't Subsidized Broadband? No Thank You.
By Camikazi on 10/28/2011 4:50:45 PM , Rating: 3
Cause getting those people online, having them buy, sell and interact on a global level as they like is how a country gets competitive?

By The Raven on 10/31/2011 2:42:39 AM , Rating: 2
Cause getting those people online, having them buy, sell and interact on a global level as they like is how a country gets competitive?
Good guess but you are wrong. The answer we were looking for was, "economic freedom, and fiscal responsibility." But on the other hand we polled 100 people at the mall and the number one answer was indeed a form of "bankrupt the country."

We also would've accepted, "move to civilization a$$Hat."

RE: Gov't Subsidized Broadband? No Thank You.
By thurston2 on 10/29/2011 5:59:42 PM , Rating: 2
Satellite is not broadband access.

By The Raven on 10/31/2011 2:30:58 AM , Rating: 2
Well it certainly isn't dialup.

"Can anyone tell me what MobileMe is supposed to do?... So why the f*** doesn't it do that?" -- Steve Jobs

Latest Headlines
Inspiron Laptops & 2-in-1 PCs
September 25, 2016, 9:00 AM
The Samsung Galaxy S7
September 14, 2016, 6:00 AM
Apple Watch 2 – Coming September 7th
September 3, 2016, 6:30 AM
Apple says “See you on the 7th.”
September 1, 2016, 6:30 AM

Most Popular ArticlesAre you ready for this ? HyperDrive Aircraft
September 24, 2016, 9:29 AM
Leaked – Samsung S8 is a Dream and a Dream 2
September 25, 2016, 8:00 AM
Inspiron Laptops & 2-in-1 PCs
September 25, 2016, 9:00 AM
Snapchat’s New Sunglasses are a Spectacle – No Pun Intended
September 24, 2016, 9:02 AM
Walmart may get "Robot Shopping Carts?"
September 17, 2016, 6:01 AM

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki