backtop


Print 36 comment(s) - last by andyhi.. on Oct 28 at 12:21 PM

Tesla Motors' third generation electric car platform will spawn multiple vehicles

When it comes to modern all-electric vehicles, Tesla Motors is normally the first name the pops into the mind of car enthusiasts. The company burst onto the scene with its two-seat Roadster, and later introduced the Roadster Sport.
 
According to a new report from AutoCar, Tesla lost money on every Roadster sold despite its $109,000 price tag ($128,500 for the Roadster Sport). Now that production on that first generation model has ceased, Tesla Motors CEO Elon Musk states that the next generation Roadster will arrive in 2014.
 
 Tesla Roadster and Model S [Source: Tesla Motors]
 
The new third-generation platform that will underpin the new Roadster will also be shared with a new 3-Series sized vehicle according to Musk. “This platform will spawn a range of cars in the next four to five years,” Musk added. “It’ll be a more mass-market platform for cars like a 3-series as well as the new Roadster. These cars will supplement the Model S range.”
 
Tesla is launching its all-electric Model S sedan -- which is roughly the size of a BMW 5-Series -- next year. The Roadster was loosely based on the Lotus Elise, while the Model S is an all-new "from scratch" design. It will have a base price of $57,400, so we wonder how long it will take for the company to actually make money on the vehicle.
 
Companies like Fisker Automotive and Tesla Motors are currently in the news as many question their worthiness of receiving government funding.

Source: AutoCar



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Confused
By AssBall on 10/27/2011 10:18:41 AM , Rating: 1
Remember all that income you had to give the Government last year.... yeah.


RE: Confused
By mufdvr3669 on 10/27/2011 11:54:07 AM , Rating: 1
I thought that my money went to those expensive wars to secure oil in the middle east. People aren't dying to secure batteries.


RE: Confused
By Dorkyman on 10/27/2011 12:21:51 PM , Rating: 3
And without that oil we would be in really deep poo right now.
...and then Dear Leader makes it worse by blocking domestic sourcing.


RE: Confused
By DT_Reader on 10/27/11, Rating: 0
RE: Confused
By FITCamaro on 10/27/2011 2:04:31 PM , Rating: 3
They're handing out leases in areas that don't necessarily have oil while NOT handing out leases in areas that are known to have oil.

And no the oil companies make money largely by refining oil and selling the products produced by it. They have to buy oil otherwise. So the higher the cost, the higher the prices they have to charge for those products. And the less people buy. They gain nothing by drilling less.

A lot of the problems with offshore drilling is that there is a shortage of oil rigs in the world. And when Obama banned drilling in the gulf after the oil spill last year, many oil rigs were moved to places where oil could be drilled.


RE: Confused
By JediJeb on 10/27/2011 2:48:39 PM , Rating: 2
Many of those rigs went to Brazil where we(US) helped finance their drilling operations. Then we buy the oil we helped produce.

Would be like me giving someone $100 then paying them 10% interest to borrow it back.


RE: Confused
By BZDTemp on 10/27/2011 2:10:53 PM , Rating: 2
Domestic oil is like nothing with regards to covering the need.


"We can't expect users to use common sense. That would eliminate the need for all sorts of legislation, committees, oversight and lawyers." -- Christopher Jennings














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki