Master of Unlocking: Apple Patents Swipe-to-Unlock Despite Prior Art
October 26, 2011 3:27 PM
comment(s) - last by
Some say that Apple is behaving like a patent troll.
(Source: Peter Jackson/New Line Cinema)
One patent just wasn't enough, Netherlands declares U.S. patent garbage
Apple, Inc. (
) has an interesting knack for convincing the
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
to grant it patents on relatively obvious GUI actions/animations. Two famous examples of that are the patented "scroll bounceback" animation that it's
using to sue Samsung
Electronics Comp., Ltd. (
) and the "swipe unlock" gesture/animation, which it is
using to sue
HTC Corp. (
Now the kind folks at the USPTO have handed Apple another gift wrapped patent -- a second patent on swipe gesture unlocking.
U.S. Patent No. 8,046,721
redescribes what was already described in
U.S. Patent No. 7,890,778
, only this time with more words.
Apple delivers 11,700 words -- roughly 17 pages in size 10 Times New Roman font -- to describe what basically equates to "Drag your finger across the screen along the animated track, the touch API responds, recognizes the gesture, animates the slider, and unlocks when the drag is complete."
Apple is the master of unlocking, having received two patents on the simple gesture.
Again Apple has claimed ownership of
forms of swipe unlocking -- even the wide vertical drag down bar that HTC implements (which looks little like Apple's iOS tracked slider unlock).
Among those prominently listed on the patent is iOS chief Scott Forstall. Viewed as a future CEO candidate, Mr. Forstall wears the same outfit to presentations and drives the same car as the late Steve Jobs. Many describe the ruthless executive as a "mini Steve Jobs" and say he's
now assumed Steve's former role of "Apple's chief A-hole."
You can witness late Apple CEO Steven P. Jobs bragging about the feature back in 2007 at the original iPhone's launch:
Mr. Jobs initiated a lawsuit crusade against Android handset makers, which Apple is continuing in his memory. Mr. Jobs suggested that even if he wasted every bit of money Apple has ever made
it would be worth it to destroy Android
, commenting, "I will spend my last dying breath if I need to, and I will spend every penny of Apple's $40 billion in the bank, to right this wrong. I'm going to destroy Android, because it's a stolen product."
In Mr. Jobs mind Android's "stealing" was wrong, but interestingly he often boasted of his own powers of idea theft. Indeed he lifted the idea for his successful Mac operating system from Xerox Corp. (
) He once bragged, "Picasso had a saying - 'Good artists copy, great artists steal.' And we have always been
about stealing great ideas."
You can watch this for yourself here:
However, the USPTO's idea of validity doesn't fly in all countries. A Dutch judge
on Apple's use of U.S. Patent 7,657,849 (the original unlocking patent) to try to ban sales of Samsung smartphones ruled the Apple patent was "obvious" (in Dutch he said it was "lying close at hand" -- literally "for the hand lying") and likely invalid. He points out that Neonode Inc.'s (
) N1m -- launched in 2005 -- had a virtually identical unlocking feature, albeit with a different graphic.
Apple lifted the unlock feature from NeoNode. [Source: FOSS Patents]
He also acknowledged a similar on-off use in Guitar Rig:
Guitar Rig -- 2004 [Source: Wikimedia Commons]
...as pointed out by Samsung's attorney's. The guitar after-effects software was available back in 2004 -- three years before the first iPhone was released. The judge complained that the Apple work was "not inventive" and suggested that the patent should be invalidated.
Samsung has removed one other minor GUI animation from its smartphones in the Netherlands,
escaping a potential sales ban
. However, the threat of a ban in the U.S. where questionable patents hold greater power,
This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled
RE: I've said it before....
10/26/2011 4:21:32 PM
Problem is that patents should be
. However, it's up to the court to rule the validity of a patent, meaning the USPTO can just give any patent to everybody, the court system will rule the bad ones out.
Of course this is a system designed by lawyers, meaning in works in dreamland where judges, lawyers and courtroom are in infinite supply and money rains from the sky.
RE: I've said it before....
10/26/2011 4:50:47 PM
I guess when you lay a 17 pages of pure gibberish it impresses them so much they just have to give you a patent.
RE: I've said it before....
10/27/2011 7:43:19 AM
Your joke is not far from the truth. It is all about lawyers. By flooding the patent offices of the World with this nonsense, it essentially takes the patent offices out of play by sheer volume. This is what the lawyers want, because it forces all IP issues into court and guarantees an increase in the number of IP disputes. After all, lawyers make much more money going to court than reviewing patent submissions. Large corporations don't mind paying the lawyers, because only other large corporations can afford the lawyers, thus protecting them from the small company / individual inventors.
It creates a tech fuedal system, where rather than land being granted by the king, IP is granted to the feudal lords (Apple, MS, IBM, etc.) by the various governments. The programmers (peasants) who actually create the IP get only the "protection" of their feudal lord.
"So, I think the same thing of the music industry. They can't say that they're losing money, you know what I'm saying. They just probably don't have the same surplus that they had." -- Wu-Tang Clan founder RZA
Steve Jobs: "I'm Going to Destroy Android, Because It's a Stolen Product"
October 20, 2011, 10:45 PM
Samsung Modifies Its Hardware, Software to Try to Appease Apple
October 20, 2011, 6:00 PM
Judge Refuses Apple's Request for Preliminary Injunction Against Samsung
October 14, 2011, 11:38 AM
"Apple's chief A-hole" Forstall Keeps Steve Jobs Executive Legacy Alive
October 13, 2011, 6:30 PM
UPDATED: Netherlands Judge Finds Samsung Guilty of Infringement of Apple IP
August 24, 2011, 10:19 AM
Microsoft "Hopes" Developers Will Make Xbox One Games Unplayable Offline
May 24, 2013, 12:13 PM
Federal Judge Sides with U.S. DOJ in Apple E-Books Preliminary Hearing
May 24, 2013, 11:46 AM
HTC Considers "Senseless" One Smartphone
May 24, 2013, 8:00 AM
HTC One Hits 5 Million Sales in First Month, Despite Issues
May 23, 2013, 4:04 PM
HTC First's Arrival in UK Canceled, Facebook Assesses "Home" Feedback
May 23, 2013, 3:02 PM
Microsoft Expands Windows Azure in Asia, Mocks iPad in New Commercial
May 23, 2013, 12:06 PM
Most Popular Articles
High School Student Creates Storage Device that Can Charge in 20 Seconds
May 20, 2013, 6:51 AM
Apples Tries to Use Decade-Old Patents to Ban Samsung Galaxy S IV
May 22, 2013, 3:00 PM
NASA Awards $125,000 Grant for 3D Printed Food on Long-Term Space Travels
May 21, 2013, 1:32 PM
Microsoft Announces Voice-Controlled "Xbox One"
May 21, 2013, 12:55 AM
Seawater Cooling Saves Data Center Big Bucks, Energy, Despite Jellyfish Issues
May 17, 2013, 3:23 PM
Latest Blog Posts
Lumosity: Does it Work?
May 22, 2013, 8:20 PM
Quick Note: Sony "Teases" PS4 Ahead of Xbox Reveal in New Video
May 20, 2013, 12:33 PM
Nokia Introduces Instagram-Like App of Its Own to Help Lumia Sales
May 20, 2013, 7:10 AM
Parents of Pre-Teen Drivers Commonly Practice Distracted Driving Says Study
May 9, 2013, 7:16 AM
Apple's iOS 7 Running Into Internal Delays Due to Massive Overhaul
May 1, 2013, 4:26 PM
More Blog Posts
Copyright 2013 DailyTech LLC. -
Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information