Print 21 comment(s) - last by Penti.. on Oct 23 at 5:23 AM

Google had fought to keep Oracle from using the email against it

Last year, Oracle sued Google for patent infringement concerning the Android mobile operating system. Oracle claimed that Google had infringed on Java-related patents and copyrights, and Oracle had purchased the rights to Java in 2009 when it purchased Sun Microsystems for $5.6 billion.

Google said it had looked into using other programming languages for its Android mobile operating system, but they apparently didn't meet Google's standards.

"Java is essential for Android," said Al Hilwa, of research firm IDC. "Since Android has been out there for more than a year, most people would have expected they were in compliance with whatever license terms apply."

Not long before Oracle filed its lawsuit, Google had created an email saying that it needed to "negotiate a license for Java." Once the lawsuit erupted, Google fought to keep the email from being used by Oracle in the case.

But now, U.S. District Judge William Alsup ruled in an order on Thursday that the email is not protected by the attorney client privilege.

"Google has failed to identify any aspect of the challenged order that was clearly erroneous or contrary to law," said Alsup in the ruling.

While this doesn't look good for Google, Alsup already partially granted a request by Google to throw out Oracle's $2.6 billion in damages, saying that 90 percent of the Oracle patents were ruled invalid.

Reports have also noted that Google could drop parts of Java's J2SE code from the Android mobile operating system and avoid further Java-related issues with Oracle.

Source: Reuters

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: This is a big deal
By melgross on 10/21/2011 11:03:33 AM , Rating: 2
You don't have to have a competing product, though that helps. Google would have to pay dearly.

But remember that Sun won a similar case against Microsoft several years ago, where MS was subverting Java to run only only on Windows. Sun won that case, and prevented Microsoft from using it, even though MS had a license.

Google has also modified the code, which isn't allowed under the license anyway, so they could be in big trouble. This isn't just a situation where they are using the code, as is, and need to only pay for past use as well as future use. This is much more serious.

RE: This is a big deal
By Ragin69er on 10/21/2011 12:35:22 PM , Rating: 2
If the code is modified sufficiently then they technically aren't using the same code and thus the licence is invalid anyways. It comes down to whether or not software is really patentable, since so much of it is obvious.

In all likelihood this will end up with a relatively minor settlement once the majority of the rest of Oracles patents are ruled invalid as is being investigated right now.

People are such doomsday advocates, you would think they should be on the street corner holding a sign!

If Oracle hadn't gotten so greedy in demanding such a huge sum of cash this would be over and done with by now.

RE: This is a big deal
By Murst on 10/21/2011 1:54:14 PM , Rating: 2
If the code is modified sufficiently then they technically aren't using the same code and thus the licence is invalid anyways.

Sorry, but that's just flat out false. You can't just make a derivative to get around the copyright. If you started with something you don't have a license for, your end product will still be violating the same license, no matter how different your end product actually is (as long as it can be proven that you got there from the original, unlicensed code).

RE: This is a big deal
By Fritzr on 10/22/2011 3:08:25 AM , Rating: 2
You need to do a little more reading on copyright law.

Making significant changes to the derivative product allows the new version to be a separate work that is not subject to the original copyright. So-called clean room programming where the coders are given a set of specifications, but no coding requirements other than the result function the same is the usual solution where the language definition itself is not proprietary.

The real problem is that the code base Google used has modules taken from the Sun/Oracle implementation. By claiming that the individual modules were not modified sufficiently to meet the standard in the law, Oracle can invoke copyright infringement for those modules. If Google had 'clean room' code that implemented Java with no connection other than implementing the standardized language definition, there would be less of a problem.

RE: This is a big deal
By Horizon79 on 10/21/2011 3:24:47 PM , Rating: 2
Sun didn't win it. Microsoft settled with them.

"Young lady, in this house we obey the laws of thermodynamics!" -- Homer Simpson

Latest Headlines
Inspiron Laptops & 2-in-1 PCs
September 25, 2016, 9:00 AM
The Samsung Galaxy S7
September 14, 2016, 6:00 AM
Apple Watch 2 – Coming September 7th
September 3, 2016, 6:30 AM
Apple says “See you on the 7th.”
September 1, 2016, 6:30 AM

Most Popular ArticlesSmartphone Screen Protectors – What To Look For
September 21, 2016, 9:33 AM
UN Meeting to Tackle Antimicrobial Resistance
September 21, 2016, 9:52 AM
Walmart may get "Robot Shopping Carts?"
September 17, 2016, 6:01 AM
5 Cases for iPhone 7 and 7 iPhone Plus
September 18, 2016, 10:08 AM
Update: Problem-Free Galaxy Note7s CPSC Approved
September 22, 2016, 5:30 AM

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki