Print 34 comment(s) - last by spread.. on Oct 20 at 10:04 PM

Analysts say Apple should now be back on the fast track to success

Analysts -- for now -- are willing to give the perrenial performer Apple, Inc. (AAPL) a pass for poorer than expected earnings.  Apple traditionally has surpassed analyst targets for unit sales and its balance sheet.  But in the recent quarter, while growing, it sold 3 million less iPhones and 2 million less iPads than expected (i.e. it grew slower than expected).

For the most part analysts blamed the miss on a ripple-effect triggered by a slow iPhone 4S release (and perhaps, by proxy, co-founder Steven P. Jobs' death).  They nearly unanimously predict Apple will get back on track this quarter.

Goldman Sachs suggests lowered expectations may result in bigger blowouts for Apple:

As consensus estimates are now likely to hug guidance more closely, we expect next quarter’s expectations to remain realistic and perhaps even conservative.

Sterne Agee analyst Shaw Wu remarks:

We are not proud modeling 18.5 million iPhones which turned out higher than actual 17 million shipments but we were materially below consensus of 20 million, not to mention some analysts who assumed as high as 23 million units. It turned out that a concern we raised in our earnings preview (see our 10/12/11 note) that consensus didn't factor in enough of a "product transition" that management talked about was valid (which turned out to be iPhone 4S launching in October).

Likewise Morningstar predicts a big fourth quarter, commenting:

We continue to believe that the capabilities of the new phone, a large base of existing customers ready for renewal, and new price points for existing phones have positioned Apple for tremendous success during the next quarter, which will be 14 weeks long instead of 13 (due to a quirk in Apple’s fiscal reporting calendar).

Bank of America-Merrill Lynch attributes the glitch to "pent-up demand" and suggests that the iPhone 4S will be a smash hit, writing:

Apple missed revenue and EPS due to an underestimated pause in iPhone sales ahead of the 4S launch.  That said, we do not view this as a sign of softening iPhone demand.  In our view, solid pent-up demand, combined with incremental unit sales from new carriers added in F1Q12 (Apple deferred the new carrier addition to F1Q12 because of the iPhone 4S launch) should drive a healthy rebound in iPhone sales.  We remain buyers of the stock heading into perhaps the most successful product launch in company history, with the iPhone 4S.
iPhone 4S

Piper Jaffray analyst Gene Munster suggests that some customers are playing the waiting game, hoping to upgrade to an iPhone 5 next summer.  But he says a more-bullish-than-usual earnings guidance from Apple for calendar Q4 2011 could point to a blowout quarter.  He comments:

We see this as a disappointment, but given the strong start to iPhone 4S sales, we believe it is clear that units were pushed from the Sept. quarter into the Dec. quarter as customers waited for the "iPhone 5"...  We believe Apple's Dec-11 quarter guidance is evidence of the company's confidence in iPhone 4S and iPad sales in the Dec-11 quarter.

Morgan Stanley's Katy Huberty was similarly bullish dismissing the miss as a "hiccup".  She writes:

We believe the Street underestimated the degree to which September was a transitional quarter for the iPhone but with strong iPhone momentum out of the gate in October, we don’t see the light iPhone shipments as a cause for concern... [L]ower than expected uptick in iPad shipments was the only real "flaw" [in the quarter].

She predicts the company's stock to rise 14 percent within the next year, reaching around $480 USD/share.

II. Some Analysts are Less Cheerful

A few analysts reacted with a bit more pessimism. RBC Capital Markets analyst Mike Abramsky suggested Apple was going through a "transitional" state and suggests "strong catalysts ahead".  Yet he suggests that Q4 earnings may miss Apple's guidance, unlike many of his colleagues.  He predicts Apple to pull in $34B USD in revenue that quarter, versus the guidance of $37B USD.

Alex Gauna of JMP Securities, suggests that investors shouldn't be so quick to write off Apple's "hiccup".  He comments:

Although we anticipate widespread dismissal of the miss as a product transition wrinkle rather than a trend, we view the blow to the company’s sterling track record as significant and caution investors that, 1) Apple remains a high cost/premium vendor in an economically-sensitive environment, 2) Android is growing share more rapidly owing to a lower cost structure and supports more open development, 3) the company has now had a second stumble right out of the box under new management (the first being the iPhone launch), and 4) the company has a high risk vertical approach to many of its products.

We advise not being too quick to dismiss the iPhone miss on product transition issues, as we believe this is going to be a recurring theme for Apple given the limited scope of variety it offers in the handset and tablet categories. We would also have expected this effect to be more muted in overseas markets that are newer adopters of the devices and the majority driver of Apple growth.

Early reads on iPhone 4S sales are truly impressive, but the device is not so dramatic a departure from the prior generation iPhone 4 as to give us confidence that this device can usher back in sales reacceleration.  We continue to expect a 4G iPad refresh to arrive before a 4G iPhone in 2012, although little color has emerged regarding what will make them special beyond being 4G.

The implications of an Apple miss means more than is typical, given the importance of its aura of brilliance in sustaining premium price points and product loyalty.  This will likely also add to wellplaced investor anxiety around how the company sustains its momentum under new leadership.

Similarly Collin Gillis of BGC Partners rained on the pro-Apple parade issuing a rare downgrade to Apple's stock.  He explains:

We no longer suggest being overweight shares of AAPL and see that near-term downside risk overweighs upside reward. Shares have gained 14% since October 7, and increased 31% year-to-date. With the largest market capitalization for a U.S based company at $391 billion, any hiccup in its growth is likely to provide an opportunity to add to positions at a better price.

The company has to constantly set records just to meet expectations. There is nothing wrong with Apple’s business model or execution, but we do see that sentiment is overwhelmingly positive and shares are within 7% of our $450 price target. We believe that it is possible shares pullback below $400, possibly even this week after the earnings report on Tuesday post-market, and we would seek to be buyers at levels below $400. While there is a sea of love in the press for Apple currently, we voice the following notes of caution:

1) Impact of the pending launch of the iPhone 4S on sales in the Sep. quarter. Consensus estimates of 20 million phones sold may prove difficult to exceed given the launch of the 4S phone in the December quarter. While the company did an excellent job at delaying any discussion of a new phone until after the quarter ended, it is worth recalling that this September results have a phone that was at the end of its refresh cycle, not the start of a new one – as has been the case in September quarters in the years past.

2) Education discounts. September quarter margins also run a risk from impact due to education pricing discounts. Cost of revenue last year in the September quarter increased notably from 60.9% to 63.1% sequentially. While this was also driven by the launch of the iPhone4, it is worth mentioning that the September quarter does contain the most impact to margins from educational buying.

3) iPads. Our largest concern is centered around tablets, however. There is limited history of how seasonality and product refresh is going to impact sales of iPads, and consensus estimates of 11.5 million units sold assumes another record shattering. As the iPad is Apple’s second most meaningful revenue stream after the iPhone, if the company does not continue to set mindblowing records (iPads sales account for over 10% of worldwide PC sales just five quarters after launch) it is going to be difficult for the other parts of the business to cover the gap.

Finally, low-cost tablets from competitors willing to lose profit to gain market share are going to incrementally hurt sales of the iPad in our opinion.

Investors reacted in a similar bearish fashion depressing the stock $20 or more in trading today (~4.5-5 percent).

Apple is currently grappling with a leadership transition and preparing the iPhone 5.  To launch next summer, the iPhone 5 is rumored to be the last major project Steve Jobs directed.  The device is expected to be a major overhaul of the popular smartphone design.

Sources: WSJ [1], [2], Apple Insider

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Die investors
By gwidionx on 10/19/2011 3:01:50 PM , Rating: 4
Man, I'm tired of always hearing investors and economists whine about "poor performance" because something did not GROW 10,000% like they hoped and dreamed it would. What a bunch of babies. Get your head out of your a**.

RE: Die investors
By Chadder007 on 10/19/2011 3:57:08 PM , Rating: 2
Its as if the Analysts are planting a story to be able to short the stock in case it doesn't live up the the 10 fold profit they like to forcast that isn't possible. ;)

RE: Die investors
By Mizerable on 10/19/2011 5:20:53 PM , Rating: 5
You're getting it totally wrong... Investors have priced in the expected growth of a company into its current stock price. Meaning, people pay 400 bux for a share of Apple ASSUMING it grows at x% per year. If the actual growth is lower than x% then you overpaid duh. That's why stock prices can fall even though you have positive growth.

RE: Die investors
By spread on 10/19/11, Rating: 0
RE: Die investors
By augiem on 10/20/2011 1:49:37 PM , Rating: 1
He's not getting it wrong at all. The core is they complain about "poor performance" when their expectations are TOO HIGH. Just because ludicrous growth expectations are built into a stock's price does not make them any less ludicrous.

RE: Die investors
By Shadowself on 10/19/2011 6:52:37 PM , Rating: 5
It's not the investors themselves. It's investors -- especially the institutional investors -- listening to the analysts.

The reality is that Apple beat the predictions by these same analysts something like 28 quarters in a row. The analysts have been slowly hiking up their predictions trying to not look stupid and Apple still beat their predictions. Finally, the analysts *really* hiked up their predictions with no real basis to do so. (What sane person thought Apple was going to have such a fantastic quarter as predicted?)

When Apple failed to meet the most recent, radically inflated predictions, Wall Street blamed it on Apple in general. Then they blamed it on the delay of the 4S. Then they claimed it was the resignation of Jobs and people holding off buying Apple stuff because no one knew where Apple was going. Then they claimed Apple was "channel stuffing" in calendar Q1 and calendar Q2 leaving calendar Q3 to be lower than predicted through absolutely no fault of the analysts own. (Clearly Apple intentionally deceived them!) Who knows what excuse they analysts will use next? The newly proposed Apple headquarters is really planned as a refugee site for Martians?

"Spreading the rumors, it's very easy because the people who write about Apple want that story, and you can claim its credible because you spoke to someone at Apple." -- Investment guru Jim Cramer

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki