U.S. Government Still Stumbling Through Changing Cyber Matters
October 19, 2011 8:29 AM
comment(s) - last by
In addition to beefing up US government cyber defenses, there is continued talk to try and determine the legality (and feasibility) of cyber attacks on foreign sources
United States Air Force Gen. Robert Kehler, head of the new U.S. cyber command, admitted the legality of government-sanctioned cyber attacks remains an extremely complicated manner that must be appropriately addressed.
If needed, the Department of Defense wants a method in which it can attack credible targets, when needed, while still protecting its 15,000+ computer networks. Government officials previously were weary of trying to militarize its cyber efforts, but wanted the ability to accurately determine if a cyber offensive would be needed. "Is active defense really offense in cyberspace?" Kehler pondered in a statement to the media.
"I would argue that it really is not. It does not have to be, for sure. But those are the issues that we are trying to work our way through."
Cyber security experts agree with Kehler's standpoint, warning that it'd be hard to attack rogue groups often times operating without approval from foreign governments.
However, a solid cyber defense that is able to adjust to changing threats would be ideal to help better protect from hackers and cyber criminals. Continued cyber attacks from foreign sources have created a significant level of urgency among US lawmakers, anxious to protect a still delicate US infrastructure that has been compromised in the past.
The topic of cyber security has become a hot-button political issue, with numerous lawmakers and branches of the US government now paying attention. Also showing a drastic change in cyber discussion, Senate Commerce Chairman Jay Rockefeller (D-W.Va) issued a statement saying the Securities and Exchange Commission's effort for companies to discuss cyber security threats with their shareholders "fundamentally changes" how things are done today.
If the threat of foreign attacks wasn't enough, organized hacker groups continue to plague governments and corporations already cautious of attack. Along with foreign threats from China, Eastern Europe, and organized, government-sanctioned hacker groups throughout the world, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is worried about the Anonymous hacker group attacking industrial control systems helping power the U.S. infrastructure.
Earlier in the year, AntiSec
exposed Social Security numbers
and passwords of U.S. military personnel, with additional attacks promised in the future.
The US government is finally embracing a digital approach to its defenses -- and possible offensive cyber ability -- but foreign criminals seem to always have the upper hand.
This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled
10/20/2011 1:37:31 PM
Yes, it's "process of law" or "due process". You can't just do things, you have to think them through and major changes should not be up to one man. Would you rather that choices were simply made for you? That's why we have representation. Granted, conservative views often seem to limit our freedoms - but you'll have that anywhere.
10/20/2011 2:20:26 PM
Also, it's the military (Air Force) which will be heading up cyber attacks if we decide to do them. I can't believe we're not already. "Attack" is a bit of a misguidance. "Spying" is more like it. We're not blowing up nuclear reactors. There are too many local manual controls to do something like that anyway I would imagine, and we don't really want to do our enemies harm. We would rather know what they're up to, and try to thwart any plans to do US harm. Despite being a service member in the USAF, and despite any past wars/conflicts/occupations that our leadership has decided that we should engage in - I would like to think that America is NOT a warring nation, but a DEFENSIVE nation. Sadly, our video games, our politics, and to hear people talk about revenge makes me think that we have become a war loving people, and have come to take our relative peace for granted.
"Intel is investing heavily (think gazillions of dollars and bazillions of engineering man hours) in resources to create an Intel host controllers spec in order to speed time to market of the USB 3.0 technology." -- Intel blogger Nick Knupffer
AntiSec Exposes U.S. Soldiers' S/Ns, Passwords, Vows Attack on Monsanto
July 12, 2011, 8:45 AM
Twitter Senior VP: "Diversity is Important, But We Can’t Lower the Bar"
November 9, 2015, 9:59 AM
CNN Resorts to Internet Censorship to Promote Clinton Over Senator Sanders
October 15, 2015, 2:47 PM
Breaking Bad: How to Crash Google's Chrome Browser With Just 8 Characters
September 23, 2015, 11:08 AM
Quick Note: Amazon UK Offers £10 Back on Any Order £50 or Over
August 3, 2015, 12:05 PM
Editorial: Reddit Allows Itself to be Hijacked as a Hate Platform For Racist Bigots
July 21, 2015, 6:32 PM
Mozilla and Facebook to Adobe: It's Time to Kill Flash
July 20, 2015, 6:30 PM
Latest Blog Posts
Sceptre Airs 27", 120 Hz. 1080p Monitor/HDTV w/ 5 ms Response Time for $220
Dec 3, 2014, 10:32 PM
Costco Gives Employees Thanksgiving Off; Wal-Mart Leads "Black Thursday" Charge
Oct 29, 2014, 9:57 PM
"Bear Selfies" Fad Could Turn Deadly, Warn Nevada Wildlife Officials
Oct 28, 2014, 12:00 PM
The Surface Mini That Was Never Released Gets "Hands On" Treatment
Sep 26, 2014, 8:22 AM
ISIS Imposes Ban on Teaching Evolution in Iraq
Sep 17, 2014, 5:22 PM
More Blog Posts
Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. -
Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information