backtop


Print 74 comment(s) - last by FITCamaro.. on Oct 18 at 10:35 PM


BAE F-35 Helmet  (Source: BAE Systems)
Fancy futuristic JSF helmet still not working

Schools are already in place to train fresh F-35 pilots now that the aircraft are inching closer to actual service duty. However, one thing that was still questionable was the wild looking helmet that is intended to give the pilot a 360-degree view around the aircraft.
 
The problem is that the high-tech helmet that the F-35 program needs is having some significant issues with performance. Specifically, the maker of the JSF helmet, Vision Systems International, has been unable to get high quality images displayed on the pilot’s visor.
 
Since the availability of that fancy helmet is questionable, a contract to create another helmet with less technology crammed in has been granted to BAE Systems.
 
BAE is using a version of the helmet that Eurofighter Typhoon pilots use. The Typhoon display that would be in the helmet is being removed and it is being replaced with a set of night vision goggles and a single eyepiece showing the heads-up display HUD.
 
"BAE Systems Electronic Systems is proud to be a part of the Lockheed Martin team for the F-35 HMD,” said Jim Garceau, vice president and general manager of defense avionics for BAE Systems. “The NVG HMD will enable all aspects of flight operations and it allows us to build on our long history of successful development programs with Lockheed Martin on the F-35, F-16 and F-22 programs.”
 
The helmet will also incorporate the BAE Q-sight and head tracking technology to help with precise weapons delivery. The modular design also allows an upgrade path for pilots to binocular visor-projected displays, alternate image sources, and night vision.
 
The helmet can also be easily modified if it becomes the main helmet for the F-35.

Sources: DefenseTech, BAE Systems



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Waste is still waste.
By Dradien on 10/18/2011 8:46:03 AM , Rating: 1
"What the fuck are you smoking? We have one of the HIGHEST corporate tax rates in the world.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tax_rates_around_the_..."

Do you have anything a bit more recent? Considering Bush had a nice little habit of lowering taxes and whatnot?

"Companies, just like individuals, take advantage of every loophole they can find."

Then get rid of the loopholes? Still, most big corporations have a lower effective tax rate then the rest of the world though tax incentives and rebates and whatnot.

"Want a truly fair system? Fairtax. But no Democrat (and even most big government Republicans) would ever vote for it because it doesn't redistribute wealth."

You truely are blinded by "party" lines, aren't you? Please explain to me, what's so fair about this fair tax?

"And you want GE to pay taxes? Why don't you go tell the president who's a big friend of their CEO."

Yep, I'm personally going to go and tell Obama to tax GE, and he'll listen. Real good plan there pal.

However, I do think it is abhorrent that they didn't pay any taxes. I don't support it one bit.

"And you mean that real estate collapse that happened because the government went so far as to sue banks who didn't give out enough loans to minorities?"

You have proof of this other then a Fox News Blurb?

"Yeah practices like that couldn't possibly had anything to do with why banks gave out loans to people who likely couldn't repay them. What bank would give out a loan they knew would go bad?"

Are you seriously this stupid (or self deluded)? They issued loans and morgages they knew were bad so they can cut them up and sold them on the exchange market, and bet AGAINST them, because they knew they would fail. If you didn't know, the Glass–Steagall Act kept banks out of speculation, for this exact reason. Since it was repealed in 1999 (Clintons worst move, ever), it opened the floodgates for the banks to partake in speculation, and they did that by using morgages as securitys, told people they were solid investments, and shorted them because they knew they were going to fail eventually.

It had nothing to do with the big bad Government saying they better write morgages to dem damn minorities!!

"And now they're suing the banks for selling the loans to them when it was they who encouraged it in the first place."

You keep repeating this, come on, show me some numbers or something here. The Government doesn't sue banks for not giving enough loans out, not for ones people cannot afford. Need some proof here.

One thing you keep complaining about is the practice of redistributing wealth, and how it's all bad. In case you haven't noticed, for the last 30 years, this has been happening, but it's all been going up. We now have one of the worst spreads of wealth in our history. It's fine though, according to Reagen, it'll trickle back down!!

------------------------------------------------- -----------------------------

Also, FITCamaro, this is from the reply to sigmatau below me, since refuting you and showing how wrong you are is so...easy...and fun.

"Someone pays $0 taxes after they do their tax return and still gets a several thousand dollar check back every year = redistributing wealth."

How do you figure? In the last 30 or so years, we've all been doing tax returns, and yet wealth is still moving upward and concentrating at the top. So yea, it's being redistributed, but upward.

Also, this pays 0% tax is shit. Even if no one pays Payroll tax, they still pay Gas Tax, Sales Tax (Most states), estate/property tax, etc etc. Stop repeating Fox lines please, it's making you look stupid.

"No one should have a NEGATIVE tax liability."

And yet, many many corporations do...

"And no the banks didn't give the loans because they saw that the people would never be able to pay the money back."

Yes...they did. They just needed the morgages to use them as speculative items.

"Democrats saw this as racist and sued."

Tired line...source please? Show me some of them court dockets...they're all public.


RE: Waste is still waste.
By Solandri on 10/18/2011 9:26:45 AM , Rating: 3
quote:
"We have one of the HIGHEST corporate tax rates in the world.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tax_rates_around_the_..."

Do you have anything a bit more recent? Considering Bush had a nice little habit of lowering taxes and whatnot?

http://www.oecd.org/document/60/0,3746,en_2649_345...
http://mercatus.org/publication/corporate-income-t...
http://businessroundtable.org/blog/on-corporate-ta...
(The last one has a historical chart which should answer your Bush question.)

The problem is larger multinational corporations are able to avoid a lot of the taxes by offshoring income (the high U.S. tax rate means they do everything they can to assign the income to a different country) and using obscure tax loopholes. It's small businesses which end up bearing the brunt of the high tax rate. In other words, those multinational corporations have taken hatred directed at them for avoiding taxes, and turned it into a high corporate tax rate which mainly hits the small businesses trying to compete against them.

Also, you may see some sites saying the U.S. corporate taxes are a smaller percentage of GDP than other countries. This ignores that taxes overall in the U.S. are a smaller percentage of GDP than in other more socialist countries. Taxes in the U.S. overall are about 25%-30% of GDP. European countries tend to be around 35%-40% of GDP. If you compensate for this and look at corporate taxes as percent of government tax revenue, the U.S. ends up about average, maybe slightly less.

Lower the corporate tax rate, but also close the loopholes. This should get multinational corporations to assign more of their income to the U.S., make it harder to avoid taxes, and help level the playing field with small businesses. You should see corporate tax revenue increase, economic activity increase, and improved competitiveness. Win/win/win. The companies/lobbyists paying for all the tax loopholes, and foreign countries which corporations use to report income are the only ones winning right now.


RE: Waste is still waste.
By Dradien on 10/18/2011 11:09:11 AM , Rating: 2
You're way better with words then I am. I support what you're proposing here. I wouldn't mind a slightly lower corporate tax, if everyone played fair, which companies with money don't do...


RE: Waste is still waste.
By gamerk2 on 10/18/2011 11:27:49 AM , Rating: 2
The saddest part is that Cain, though wrong on the numbers, has the right idea: Lower the rate, and remove all deductions. He screws up by implementing a flat tax though...

FYI: The reason a Flat Tax does NOT work is simple: You would be increasing the tax rate on the poorest americans, puting more of them on government assistance, which costs more then whatever you collect via taxation in the first place. The lower and middle classes drive economic activity, and you want as much money in their pockets to spend as possible.

Thats also why the Stimulus and other economic policies have failed thus far: They focus on the Supply side: IE coorporations, rather then directly giving aid to the populace. A Federal Work Program would have ended this recession by now...

Fixing the tax code is simple: Lower all rates by 10-15%, and remove all deductions. Income gets taxed at the same rate, regardless of source [IE: INVESTMENTS].


RE: Waste is still waste.
By FITCamaro on 10/18/2011 12:41:24 PM , Rating: 2
Again. Fairtax. A national sales tax that EVERYONE pays regardless of how they make their money. Certain items like groceries are exempt. No deductions. No tax returns. No IRS(or at least very little of one).

The poor aren't taxed because they're only buying what they need. But they also don't get thousands of dollars in other people's money. This also takes care of the problem of taxing those who earn their incomes illegally.


RE: Waste is still waste.
By FITCamaro on 10/18/2011 12:56:27 PM , Rating: 1
Yes and I'm against corporations having negative tax liabilities. Funny though that one of the biggest companies to have a negative tax liability (GE) is so closely entwined with the Obama administration, they might as well become part of the Democrat party.

Crony capitalism at its finest. But you never hear the Democrats complaining about GE not paying taxes for some reason...hmmm....I wonder why....


RE: Waste is still waste.
By Dradien on 10/18/2011 10:10:51 PM , Rating: 2
You just heard one complain, so you can't say "never". You need to get out more bud.


"If they're going to pirate somebody, we want it to be us rather than somebody else." -- Microsoft Business Group President Jeff Raikes

Related Articles













botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki