Print 47 comment(s) - last by mindless1.. on Oct 19 at 1:38 AM

Ford EcoBoost V6 Engine  (Source: Ford)
EcoBoost is proving very popular with truck buyers

With automakers focused on increased fuel efficiency these days, the move to smaller displacement engines with turbochargers is happening at a rapid pace. Ford was one of the first to head in that direction on the domestic market with its EcoBoost V6 engine that has so far been used in the Taurus, F-150, Flex and several other Lincoln vehicles.
The F-150 with the EcoBoost twin turbo V6 engine has proven to be very popular. In fact, the combination of the F-150 and the EcoBoost is so popular that Ford is raising the sales forecast for the truck. Ford says the reason for the forecast upgrade is that the market demand for the EcoBoost F-150 has been greater than expected. 
Previously Ford had expected about 40% of the F-150 trucks sold to use the EcoBoost 3.5L engine. Ford is now predicting that about 45% of the F-150 trucks it sells to have the EcoBoost with a total retail sales number of about 100,000 in 2011. Ford full-size pickup sales -- including HD vehicles and fleet vehicles – are up almost 8% to 416,488 units through September 30.
Traditionally, the V8 is the engine of choice in the F-150 and truck market overall. Ford does provide a version of the 5.0-liter V8 used in the Mustang GT for F-150 buyers that still want eight cylinders on tap.
During the last few months, the WSJ reports that the EcoBoost has accounted for 42% of F-150 sales. This is in part thanks to the robust power and towing capacity mixed with fuel economy averaging 18 mpg compared to the 14-17 mpg for V8-equipped trucks.

Source: WSJ

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: I'd pick the V6
By kittypuncher on 10/17/2011 6:06:14 AM , Rating: 1
On the contrary, forced induction engines often make better torque than larger, naturally aspirated engines...

Often? There are rare exceptions to this rule, so please do enlighten us with the paradigm change of small displacement creating more torque than large displacement. Especially in large diesel...
Either way, for most city-dwellers, that 3.5 is all that's needed, and praise to Ford for their ingenuity.

RE: I'd pick the V6
By Spuke on 10/17/2011 10:05:02 AM , Rating: 2
Often? There are rare exceptions to this rule, so please do enlighten us with the paradigm change of small displacement creating more torque than large displacement.
??? "Rare exceptions" makes what the poster said correct, would it not? We sure have a LOT of people that don't understand what a turbocharger is or does. With a turbo you can easily place your powerband where you want it making small displacement engines drive like larger one's. And with the added benefit of small displacement when you're not on it. That's the whole point of turbocharging.

RE: I'd pick the V6
By mindless1 on 10/19/2011 1:38:59 AM , Rating: 2
On the surface that sounds fine, but when considering a vehicle that will potentially be subject to extended high load conditions, it is inevitable that the smaller displacement turbo engine (with all else being equal...) will wear out sooner.

There is no free lunch. They can use good engineering and make it last as long as the older design, but by the same token they can use the engineering to improve the NA engine to make it even more long lasting.

There's a label for people buying this turbo V6 truck. Beta-tester. No matter how much testing an auto manufacturer puts into a design, later through real world applications they find flaws they missed and revise the design.

"So, I think the same thing of the music industry. They can't say that they're losing money, you know what I'm saying. They just probably don't have the same surplus that they had." -- Wu-Tang Clan founder RZA

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki