Print 51 comment(s) - last by rcc.. on Oct 17 at 2:27 PM

Much of the ethanol produced from the corn was exported overseas

When it comes to removing our dependence on foreign oil there are other options than using electricity or hydrogen to power cars. One of the options is using ethanol and other biofuels to replace some of the petroleum used in our gasoline. The big downside is that most of the ethanol produced in the U.S. today is made from corn.
Corn is an important food crop that is consumed by humans and used as feed for livestock and other animals. Scientific America reports that for every ten ears of corn grown in the U.S. today, only two are consumed by humans as food. The other ears are used for animal feed and ethanol production.
The numbers show that for the year spanning August 2010 to August 2011 the biofuel industry used more corn than farmers used for animal feed and residual demand. This is the first time more corn has been used for ethanol and shows a shifting balance that could spell trouble in the future. Over that year span, farmers used 5 billion bushels of corn and ethanol production used 5.05 billion bushels. Some of that corn did return to the food supply as animal feed and corn oil.
The fear is that the shift from food being the largest use for corn and fuel taking the top spot is a concern that could have significant impact on the world grain market. One of the reasons for the shift to ethanol use for corn is the government subsidies and the import tariffs on foreign ethanol. 
Steven Rattner said in a piece written for the NYT, “Because of the subsidy, ethanol became cheaper than gasoline, and so we sent 397 million gallons of ethanol overseas last year. America is simultaneously importing costly foreign oil and subsidizing the export of its equivalent.” 
That means much of the corn being used for fuel isn't making it into American fuel tanks so we still have to import more foreign oil to meet our fuel needs. Some in Congress are working hard to get the subsidies repealed and to lift the import tariff so that cheaper biofuels made from sugarcane can be imported from Brazil. There is also a lot of research going into making ethanol from other crops like switchgrass.
Rattner also wrote, "Even farm advocates like former Agriculture Secretary Dan Glickman agree that the [ethanol] situation must be fixed. Reports filtering out of the budget talks currently under way suggest that agriculture subsidies sit prominently on the chopping block. The time is ripe."

Source: Scientific American

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: What the ****?
By lelias2k on 10/17/2011 7:11:51 AM , Rating: 1
I have a better idea:

Kill the US$ 20-50 billion in annual subsidies we give to the oil companies, which are huge and highly profitable, and invest in alternative fuel research/production.

We seem to like to talk about every penny the government gives away to any industry but oil.

RE: What the ****?
By netminder69 on 10/17/2011 10:06:19 AM , Rating: 3
That's a lie presented by politicians who want to demagogue for votes. The government doesn't cut any subsidy checks for oil companies. There are no tax dollars flowing from the government to oil companies. If you went through the government's annual budget you would never find a line item in it for subsidies to oil companies (which you would find for ethanol and other things). The so called "subsidies" (which politicians later called "loopholes" when they were called out on it) are tax code deductions allowed for capital expenditures, of which the oil industry has more than most. This deduction is not special to the oil industry, it is a deduction available to any business that files taxes in the US. It's the business equivalent to you being able to itemize a job expense on your own taxes. It's not a matter of "ending subsidies" to them as much as it is wanting to change the tax code so one industry is excluded from something everyone else gets.

RE: What the ****?
By rcc on 10/17/2011 2:27:32 PM , Rating: 2
Don't know where you've been, but it gets talked, or typed, about ad nauseum

"The Space Elevator will be built about 50 years after everyone stops laughing" -- Sir Arthur C. Clarke

Most Popular ArticlesSmartphone Screen Protectors – What To Look For
September 21, 2016, 9:33 AM
UN Meeting to Tackle Antimicrobial Resistance
September 21, 2016, 9:52 AM
Walmart may get "Robot Shopping Carts?"
September 17, 2016, 6:01 AM
5 Cases for iPhone 7 and 7 iPhone Plus
September 18, 2016, 10:08 AM
Update: Problem-Free Galaxy Note7s CPSC Approved
September 22, 2016, 5:30 AM

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki