backtop


Print 10 comment(s) - last by zzatz.. on Oct 14 at 6:29 AM


  (Source: static.guim.co.uk)
New HP analyses show that costs outweigh the benefits, but a decision has not been made yet

Back in August, Hewlett-Packard made a few jaw-dropping business moves that no one saw coming. For starters, it killed off its TouchPad tablet and accompanying webOS mobile platform. That very same day, HP confirmed that it was going to sell off its PC unit, Personal Systems Group (PSG), which is responsible for its consumer and business PCs.

A little over a week later, HP announced that it would explore other avenues as far as PSG goes, with its focus set on a spin-off. The reason for the change of mind was that no major manufacturer had the cash to buy the $10-12 billion unit. Instead, PSG head Todd Bradley went overseas to Asia to increase investments in China and begin planning to expand manufacturing there as well to obtain cheap contracts for Chinese parts and labor.

Now, HP may be changing its mind once again. HP President and CEO Meg Whitman has been looking at new analyses conducted by HP, and the cost reportedly outweighs the benefits.

According to the analyses, a spin-off of the PC division could complicate HP's supply chain, reduce profit margins on certain products and HP could lose economies of scale, thus negatively affecting HP's purchasing power with component makers.
 
If Whitman were to approve the PC spin-off, HP's other sectors could lose certain advantages they once had. HP's server computers, for example, could lose the deals it once had when buying hard drives and other components in bulk. But the company sells many more PCs than servers, with 14.9 million and 720,000 sold respectively in Q2 2011.

Then again, those in favor of the spin-off have advised that HP and an independent PC company could make a deal to buy components together, which would lead to lower costs for the server computer sector.

In addition, IBM poses as an example of a company that left the PC business and took a profit hit. During 2004, which was the last full year that IBM sold PCs, profit margins (including servers) was at 41.6 percent. In 2006, this dropped to 37.7 percent, and more recently in 2010, it only increased to 38.5 percent.

Others believe that a spin-off could boost overall profit margins as well as share price. Leo Apotheker, former HP CEO, said the "PC division was on a different track than the rest of the company," especially in the consumer-related corner.

Whitman has not made a final decision yet, but she would like to by the end of the month. 

Sources: The Wall Street Journal, ZDNet



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Finally..
By ConcernedConsumer on 10/13/2011 1:19:01 PM , Rating: 5
...a CEO who has the interest of the entire company's future in view!! I'm no fan of the current CEO and her track record, but at least she appears to be looking at the long term strategy with truly open eyes.

HP would be incredibly stupid to dump really the only decent part of the company. As anyone who's bought one of their consumer products can tell you, the weakest part of the product is the software/services. And that's what they thought they could compete with!?!




RE: Finally..
By IntelUser2000 on 10/13/2011 2:27:54 PM , Rating: 2
I wholeheartedly agree with this. In fact I was about to post something similar.

Biggest mistake Leo made was buying Autonomy. Integrating a HUGE software company to a mostly hardware company. I'm sorry for the new CEO for that. She'll have to forge direction on something that only months ago wouldn't have needed.

Leo Apotheker should be banned from ever being near top management. Or management at all.

The irony is that CEOs who get fired gets big compensation. It should be as the responsibilities go up, screwing up will have more dire consequences. Not less.


RE: Finally..
By Chadder007 on 10/13/2011 4:24:23 PM , Rating: 2
Soooo...why didn't they do any analysis BEFORE announcing a Spin Off? Instead Leo Patheticer announced it and let stocks slide like a mofo.
Did they even do any analysis BEFORE buying Autonomy?


RE: Finally..
By justjc on 10/13/2011 4:55:57 PM , Rating: 2
Considering that HP admitted to not even meeting Leo before hiring him as CEO it might just have been a random thought that made it seem like a good idea.

Too bad with webOS though, HP had the muscle to make it great but lost the heart. Although it should be said that the software team behind webOS haven't given up on the OS yet, just yesterday they made a update to their Maps app that seemingly makes the old Pre and Pixi phones run apps made with the Enyo framework(the newest framework previously reserved for the Pre3 and TouchPad).


RE: Finally..
By IlllI on 10/13/2011 4:25:58 PM , Rating: 2
I didn't have to be ceo to know that it was a bad, bad idea from the start.

at least this new one is somewhat intelligent


RE: Finally..
By boobot on 10/13/2011 4:37:03 PM , Rating: 2
Your looking at just the consumer part. The Enterpise division of HP (Software/Servers/Services) comprises of 50% of HP's revenue and 60% of their earnings. They are the second largest revenue generating Enterprise Software/Services/Server company in world. The profit margins in these areas are much greater than the PC(PSG)division . This is why they want to focus on specifically the Enterprise divisions ala IBM but HP has a much bigger brand recognition in the consumer side than IBM did. They are also the number one PC maker in terms of market share and PSG does provide a substantial amount of earnings for them. It's a tough decision and I agree that Meg (along with Ray Lane-Executive Chairman) are now taking the appropriate approach at making a long term strategic decision!


RE: Finally..
By Targon on 10/13/2011 10:45:20 PM , Rating: 2
There is a huge link between consumer awareness of products and how willing businesses are to use enterprise products. It isn't just the brand recognition here, but just an overall knowledge of what the company makes means that it is far easier to SELL the idea of who to go to for other products and services.

Dell is a good example of this, and what happens when you decide to go cheap on the consumer side, the business end tends to suffer as well.


RE: Finally..
By sleepeeg3 on 10/14/2011 12:58:20 AM , Rating: 2
They get those service contracts through their name recognition. Half of the PCs in any business are likely either HP or Dell.

Not to mention that the PC side of their business is PROFITABLE. Profit margins are for stockholders, not businesses. Apotheker just wanted to cash out.


RE: Finally..
By zzatz on 10/14/2011 6:29:00 AM , Rating: 2
To be fair, this inability to deliver decent software or services is not limited to HP. No company selling Windows systems seems to be able to deliver software or services. If there are any profits to be made in bundled software, Microsoft will capture them. Windows PC makers compete by cutting the cost of building and shipping hardware. The kind of management that focuses on cutting the cost of a system by half a cent isn't the right kind to manage software development.

That's one of the reasons that the only companies to have any success with tablets are in the phone business. Phones require some system integration and software customization skills, PCs don't.

Note that I'm talking about the Windows PC portion of any company. Separate business units can and do make money from software and services. But they must be separate, as each calls for different management skills. Any company that puts other products under the same management as Windows desktops and laptops dooms those other products.


"I want people to see my movies in the best formats possible. For [Paramount] to deny people who have Blu-ray sucks!" -- Movie Director Michael Bay














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki