AMD Launches FX CPUs with Bulldozer Architecture
October 12, 2011 12:01 AM
comment(s) - last by
AMD FX series chart (click to enlarge)
Eight-core Zambezi flagship to challenge Intel's Core i7
AMD has launched its much anticipated FX series of desktop CPUs using the
, the 32nm chips represent the company's top offerings for enthusiasts.
is the first complete redesign of AMD’s processor architecture since the K7
was launched in 1999, and features significant improvements in manufacturing, design, and cost reduction.
The drive for efficiency and greater instructions per clock (IPC) was the original impetus for
. Long gone are the days of simply increasing clock speed for easy performance gains. AMD and Intel have been increasing the number of CPU cores, but that takes up a lot of die space. Intel has been pushing HyperThreading as its way of maximizing efficiency, and is pretty good when a CPU stalls due to a cache miss, branch misprediction, or data dependency. However, AMD has decided to go a markedly different route.
module provides an independent, dedicated integer and scheduler unit for each core. A single floating point unit is shared between the two cores in a
module, along with the fetch and decode units and a 2MB L2 cache. There is a 16KB L1 data cache per core, as well as a 64KB L1 instruction cache per module. This adds up to an impressive 128KB L1 data cache, 256KB L1 instruction cache, and 8MB L2 cache for an eight-core FX processor.
Theoretically, this should provide much better performance than HyperThreading, which functions best when there are a lot of CPU stalls because all threads must compete for available execution resources. HyperThreading increases performance by approximately 30% at a cost of 5% extra die space, but the second integer core in Bulldozer could almost double integer performance at a die cost of only 12%.
The Bulldozer architecture was originally supposed to debut in the first half of 2009, and would've enabled AMD to compete toe-to-toe with Intel on pure performance, rather than on pricing alone. However, various financial difficulties and a major recession led to delays, while the divestment of its
manufacturing capacity into GlobalFoundries
led to some technical delays. Almost three years late, the design has been updated significantly in order to accommodate the latest technologies and manufacturing processes.
FX chips are built by GlobalFoundries on its 32nm Silicon on insulator (SOI) process. The eight core
chips have around two billion transistors and a die size of approximately 315mm
. An integrated northbridge unit supplies an 8MB L3 cache, four 16-bit HyperTransport 3.0 links, and the integrated memory controller. Depending on the model, it runs at either 2.2Ghz or 2.0GHz. The most significant update to the integrated dual-channel memory controller is native support for DDR3 memory at 1866MHz (DDR3-1866/PC3-14900). ECC memory is still supported; a welcome relief to those who are planning on FX-based workstations, as Intel only supports ECC memory on its much more expensive Xeon workstations.
There are instruction sets aplenty: SSE3, SSE4.1/4.2, AES, and AVX. AMD is also introducing support for FMA4 and XOP. FMA4 can be thought of as specific instructions designed to speed up Fused Multiply–Add (FMA) operations. XOP is a revision of the SSE5 instruction set, redesigned to be more compatible with Intel's AVX.
The four new FX chips being launched today will require motherboards with socket AM3+, but the good news is that enthusiasts will be able to upgrade to a top of the line FX-8150 for $245. The FX-8120 will be available for $205, while the six-core FX-6100 will be priced at $165. The four-core FX-4100 with a 95W TDP is available for only $115. All FX chips are unlocked, and AMD has already set the Guinness World Record for the “Highest Frequency of a Computer Processor” by overclocking a
chip to 8.429 GHz.
Several speed bumps are already planned for Q1 and Q2 of 2012 as GlobalFoundries 32nm process matures. However, Bulldozer won't move into into the mainstream until the
refresh next year.
cores featuring DirectX 11
, while the 10-core
processor will supplant
as the FX flagship.
This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled
10/12/2011 2:00:16 PM
I'm a little let down by the reviews I've seen but everybody knew this was coming. Two big issues were that they didnt debut at the planned clock speeds and that was because GF's 32nm process is problematic not helped by the massive size of the CPU. Even with all the problems, I dont think they had a choice in putting the proccessor out. Can only move the goal post back for so long and this is wayy past due! 2009?
From a design standpoint, I think it has promise. On Anandtech, they alluded to scheduling in Win 7 vs Win 8. Heavily threaded performance it jumps up in performance quite a bit. I think AMD was trying to be foward thinking, much like they did with Athlon 64 only this time the new architecture didnt give them the benefit of added performance vs intel chips they thought it would.
I think the maturity of GF's process will help alot, and the upcoming revisions will fare better along with the move to Win 8 and as more applications take advantage of threading.
That being said, the fact that AMD has released it at this price point, it's own branded water cooler, the fact that they emphasized how much you could overclock it with a waterblock solution speaks volumes of the companies realization that there product will not perform.
I am interested to see how it works in server land. That will be very interesting. Overall I'm disappointed, but I do see where they are trying to take it. A lot of people bashed AMD/ATI when they changed strategies for there GPU's using two smaller ones to make a "bigger" GPU and that has panned out for them quite well, but initially it only showed promise but not much else just like BD is now. Athlon wasnt always the beast everybody remembers either so I guess we'll see. Hopefully things line up for them and we get some serious competition for intel again. That's always good for us.
Until they bring something to the table, my next build will be an intel machine.
"I modded down, down, down, and the flames went higher." -- Sven Olsen
2012, 2013 AMD Fusion Products Detailed in Leaked Slides
September 24, 2011, 7:31 PM
Fusion Outshines the Cloudy Parts of AMD's Earnings Report
July 22, 2011, 9:30 AM
AMD Llano Delivers Cheap Desktop That's Got Game
June 30, 2011, 3:25 PM
The Underdog: AMD Announces Details on Trio of Upcoming CPU Designs
August 24, 2010, 12:00 PM
AMD and ATIC Launch GLOBALFOUNDRIES, Plans 32nm and 22nm Production
March 5, 2009, 8:42 AM
"Prepare to be Punished": Microsoft is Killing OneDrive With Cuts, Blames Users
November 3, 2015, 8:23 PM
Apple's New "Magic" Peripheral Line Packs High Tech, High Prices
October 13, 2015, 9:39 PM
Samsung Adds 2 TB 850 EVO, PRO SSDs for $800, $1000
July 7, 2015, 4:23 PM
Seagate Senior Researcher: Heat Can Kill Data on Stored SSDs
May 13, 2015, 2:49 PM
How to Recover Most Apps After Your NVIDIA Driver Crashes in Windows 10
March 30, 2015, 12:54 PM
Tinkerer Gets Old School Mac Plus Running on the Modern Web
March 24, 2015, 6:41 PM
Latest Blog Posts
Sceptre Airs 27", 120 Hz. 1080p Monitor/HDTV w/ 5 ms Response Time for $220
Dec 3, 2014, 10:32 PM
Costco Gives Employees Thanksgiving Off; Wal-Mart Leads "Black Thursday" Charge
Oct 29, 2014, 9:57 PM
"Bear Selfies" Fad Could Turn Deadly, Warn Nevada Wildlife Officials
Oct 28, 2014, 12:00 PM
The Surface Mini That Was Never Released Gets "Hands On" Treatment
Sep 26, 2014, 8:22 AM
ISIS Imposes Ban on Teaching Evolution in Iraq
Sep 17, 2014, 5:22 PM
More Blog Posts
Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. -
Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information