FCC Files Paperwork to Dismiss Verizon's Anti-Net-Neutrality Suit
October 7, 2011 8:12 AM
comment(s) - last by
Government Commission argues Verizon doesn't have the legal jurisdiction to sue it
U.S. Federal Communications Commission
is still struggling to try to convince the nation's biggest internet service providers to comply with its
new net neutrality rules
. Surprisingly one of the noisiest critics has been Verizon Communications, Inc. (
), a company
whose net neutrality proposal
the FCC largely adopted.
Specifically, the FCC's new rules exempt wireless carriers like Verizon from the ban on throttling internet connections. Verizon is perhaps upset about the provisions that would prevent it from
banning certain sites such as
and the provision which prevents it from charging users fees on a per-site basis, something that communications companies are
currently in talks to deploy
. Under such a scheme, each site you visited (e.g.
, etc.) would result in either a separate monthly fee or a separate per-visit fee being added to your account.
The FCC proposal is unpopular among telecoms, who complain it would prevent a "free market" in which carriers could charge users per-website usage fees. [Source: Fierce Wireless Semina via Wired]
The FCC has filed to dismiss a second lawsuit from Verizon challenging the rules. It has already defeated Verizon once, dismissing the company's first lawsuit challenge.
new court filing
the FCC's attorneys argue that Verizon has insuffiient jurisdiction to challenge the rules on a statutory basis.
"Verizon's theory of jurisdiction is that the FCC modified its radio licenses within [certain statutes] because the Open Internet Order cited the agency's authority to modify licenses, among numerous other statutory bases of authority." Verizon's attempt to appeal the order on a statutory basis, "however, applies only when this Court is asked to review an FCC order that modifies specific individual licenses. It does not apply to review of generally applicable Commission orders that, like the Open Internet Order, regulate a broad group of licensees as a class. ... Verizon's notice of appeal ... should be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction."
The argument is an interesting one. Basically, the FCC is arguing that Verizon's attorneys have misinterpreted the laws which grant it regulatory authority. Specifically it's arguing that the law permits ISPs like Verizon to only sue about individual per-carrier regulatory decisions, rather than broad regulatory edicts, like the net neutrality rules.
If the FCC's "Motion to Dismiss" is approved, Verizon's hopes of fighting the new rules will dwindle, given that it's already lost another case in court. However, it remains to be seen whether the court sides with the FCC's argument about jurisdiction. Verizon does have one thing working in its favor. It's retained Helgi G. Walker, the Washington D.C. attorney
Comcast Corp.'s (
) challenge per-company net neutralty enforcement.
Even if it wins this round, the FCC still has
more lawsuits to deal with
. It is facing a separate suit, which rather than arguing -- like Verizon -- that the rules go to far, argues instead that they don't go far enough, as they exempt wireless carriers from throttling restrictions.
This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled
10/7/2011 12:32:57 PM
Cant have a per visit internet billing like they would love to have to make them more cash, as our internet system has to many flaws currently to even remotely justify such an action.
AKA almost every single site uses ( what everyone hates ) pop-up and web redirects.
So a person visiting a web site gets a pop-up or web redirect to another "PAY" site they pay more for something they never intended to do at the whims of web site owners and tel-cos. This alone prohibits such an action from occurring. As just visiting a web site someone whom never intended to go their but the web host forced it upon them unknowingly, so they can generate more visit revenue's under such a bad scheme.
"The whole principle [of censorship] is wrong. It's like demanding that grown men live on skim milk because the baby can't have steak." -- Robert Heinlein
Verizon Sues the FCC for "Capricious" Net Neutrality Rules
October 3, 2011, 8:57 AM
FCC Gives Internet Firms the Gift of Net Neutrality
December 25, 2010, 3:20 PM
Top Wireless Firms Plot to Make Wireless Users Pay Per Page
December 20, 2010, 9:31 AM
Google and Verizon Look to Ban Discrimination of "Legal" Internet Traffic
August 9, 2010, 5:11 PM
U.S. Federal Court Rules FCC Can't Stop Comcast From Throttling Traffic
April 7, 2010, 11:23 AM
Smart Security Cameras: 5 Good Choices For Any Budget
July 25, 2016, 7:13 PM
Top 5 Smart Watches
July 21, 2016, 11:48 PM
Retiree Sues Apple For $7,500 for Wiping Honeymoon Photos From His iPhone
November 30, 2015, 10:23 AM
iPhone 7 May Pack 3-4 GB Memory, More Storage; 4-Inch Comeback is Rumored
November 20, 2015, 10:12 PM
OnePlus One, OnePlus 2 Will Receive Android Marshmallow in Q1 2016
November 16, 2015, 9:58 AM
Lenovo Whoa: Motorola Droid MAXX 2 and Turbo 2 Break Cover in Leaks
October 26, 2015, 3:12 PM
Most Popular Articles
iPhones May Get Curved Screens Next Year
August 24, 2016, 6:45 AM
Drones at the Airport
August 26, 2016, 5:00 AM
First Apple Computer Auctions for $815,000
August 27, 2016, 7:51 AM
5 Easy Ways to Lower Blood Pressure By Monique C. Bethell, Ph.D.
August 25, 2016, 8:00 AM
2 NEW PlayStation 4 Models - Unveiling September 7th
August 23, 2016, 6:23 AM
Latest Blog Posts
First Self-Driving Car debut on the streets of Singapore
Aug 28, 2016, 4:10 PM
Coming Soon - Drones and Airports
Aug 24, 2016, 12:40 PM
SolarCity’s Gigafactory: A Milesone in Emerging Technology by Lily Emamian - 15 August 2016
Aug 15, 2016, 6:30 AM
Sceptre Airs 27", 120 Hz. 1080p Monitor/HDTV w/ 5 ms Response Time for $220
Dec 3, 2014, 10:32 PM
Costco Gives Employees Thanksgiving Off; Wal-Mart Leads "Black Thursday" Charge
Oct 29, 2014, 9:57 PM
More Blog Posts
Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. -
Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information