FCC Files Paperwork to Dismiss Verizon's Anti-Net-Neutrality Suit
October 7, 2011 8:12 AM
comment(s) - last by
Government Commission argues Verizon doesn't have the legal jurisdiction to sue it
U.S. Federal Communications Commission
is still struggling to try to convince the nation's biggest internet service providers to comply with its
new net neutrality rules
. Surprisingly one of the noisiest critics has been Verizon Communications, Inc. (
), a company
whose net neutrality proposal
the FCC largely adopted.
Specifically, the FCC's new rules exempt wireless carriers like Verizon from the ban on throttling internet connections. Verizon is perhaps upset about the provisions that would prevent it from
banning certain sites such as
and the provision which prevents it from charging users fees on a per-site basis, something that communications companies are
currently in talks to deploy
. Under such a scheme, each site you visited (e.g.
, etc.) would result in either a separate monthly fee or a separate per-visit fee being added to your account.
The FCC proposal is unpopular among telecoms, who complain it would prevent a "free market" in which carriers could charge users per-website usage fees. [Source: Fierce Wireless Semina via Wired]
The FCC has filed to dismiss a second lawsuit from Verizon challenging the rules. It has already defeated Verizon once, dismissing the company's first lawsuit challenge.
new court filing
the FCC's attorneys argue that Verizon has insuffiient jurisdiction to challenge the rules on a statutory basis.
"Verizon's theory of jurisdiction is that the FCC modified its radio licenses within [certain statutes] because the Open Internet Order cited the agency's authority to modify licenses, among numerous other statutory bases of authority." Verizon's attempt to appeal the order on a statutory basis, "however, applies only when this Court is asked to review an FCC order that modifies specific individual licenses. It does not apply to review of generally applicable Commission orders that, like the Open Internet Order, regulate a broad group of licensees as a class. ... Verizon's notice of appeal ... should be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction."
The argument is an interesting one. Basically, the FCC is arguing that Verizon's attorneys have misinterpreted the laws which grant it regulatory authority. Specifically it's arguing that the law permits ISPs like Verizon to only sue about individual per-carrier regulatory decisions, rather than broad regulatory edicts, like the net neutrality rules.
If the FCC's "Motion to Dismiss" is approved, Verizon's hopes of fighting the new rules will dwindle, given that it's already lost another case in court. However, it remains to be seen whether the court sides with the FCC's argument about jurisdiction. Verizon does have one thing working in its favor. It's retained Helgi G. Walker, the Washington D.C. attorney
Comcast Corp.'s (
) challenge per-company net neutralty enforcement.
Even if it wins this round, the FCC still has
more lawsuits to deal with
. It is facing a separate suit, which rather than arguing -- like Verizon -- that the rules go to far, argues instead that they don't go far enough, as they exempt wireless carriers from throttling restrictions.
This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled
10/7/2011 10:18:24 AM
What entitles companies like Verizon to charge more for content that they didn't create simply because it's popular?
Essentially the argument comes down to well we already charge Google so they can make google.com available, so we should charge the user not only to have access to the internet, but to receive traffic from google.com. If you then access google.com after you've reached your bandwidth cap, there are yet more fees for the overage.
It's just a series of cash grabs, pure and simple.
"A politician stumbles over himself... Then they pick it out. They edit it. He runs the clip, and then he makes a funny face, and the whole audience has a Pavlovian response." -- Joe Scarborough on John Stewart over Jim Cramer
Verizon Sues the FCC for "Capricious" Net Neutrality Rules
October 3, 2011, 8:57 AM
FCC Gives Internet Firms the Gift of Net Neutrality
December 25, 2010, 3:20 PM
Top Wireless Firms Plot to Make Wireless Users Pay Per Page
December 20, 2010, 9:31 AM
Google and Verizon Look to Ban Discrimination of "Legal" Internet Traffic
August 9, 2010, 5:11 PM
U.S. Federal Court Rules FCC Can't Stop Comcast From Throttling Traffic
April 7, 2010, 11:23 AM
Die Shots Confirm A8 Packs Six PowerVR "Rogue" GPU Clusters
September 22, 2014, 4:05 PM
WSJ: Yes, HTC Nexus 9 ("Babel") is Incoming
September 22, 2014, 4:00 PM
Quick Note: Flagship BlackBerry Passport Smartphone to be Priced at $599 Unsubsidized
September 22, 2014, 3:31 PM
ChipWorks Confirms Apple's iPhone A8 SoC Switch to TSMC
September 22, 2014, 1:41 PM
A Year After It Was First Announced, PlayStation TV Headed to U.S. for $99
September 22, 2014, 11:37 AM
4.7" Samsung Galaxy Alpha to Grace AT&T’s Network Sept. 26 for $199 on Contract
September 22, 2014, 11:16 AM
Most Popular Articles
HTC Preps Nexus 9 With Nvidia K1 64-Bit "Denver" SoC, Android L Onboard
September 10, 2014, 10:21 PM
Apple iPhone 6, iPhone 6 Plus Reviews Roll In
September 16, 2014, 9:13 PM
Big Media: If You Want Privacy, You're Probably a Pirate
September 18, 2014, 2:57 PM
Apple Cripples NFC in iPhone 6, 6+ With Developer Ban
September 17, 2014, 1:00 PM
"Decepticon" Driver Triumphs Over Cops in Massachusetts Court
September 5, 2014, 12:07 PM
Latest Blog Posts
ISIS Imposes Ban on Teaching Evolution in Iraq
Sep 17, 2014, 5:22 PM
Space Terrorism is a Looming Threat For the United States
Apr 23, 2014, 7:47 PM
Facebook Aims to Provide Internet to "Every Person in the World" with Drones, Satellites
Apr 1, 2014, 10:20 AM
Retail Mobile Sites Experience Outages in Light of Simplexity's Bankruptcy
Mar 14, 2014, 8:48 AM
Tesla vs. BMW: Who Has the Safer EV?
Feb 1, 2014, 2:56 PM
More Blog Posts
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. -
Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information