backtop


Print 100 comment(s) - last by therealnickdan.. on Oct 7 at 11:12 AM


That's right Mr. President, keep loaning the money, everything is going GREAT!  (Source: Getty Images)
President says high-risk loan was "felt like... a good bet"

(This article contains editorial commentary, which is the opinion of the author.)

President Barack Obama has endured scathing criticism in recent weeks for loaning $535M USD to failed solar startup Solyndra.  The loan came as part of a $40B USD "green" technology stimulus effort.  But on September 1, 2011 Solyndra filed Chapter 11 bankruptcy, leaving its 1,000+ employees looking for work and leaving the government staring at an un-recoupable loss.

I. Interview: Obama says "No" regrets on wasting $500M USD

In recent weeks Republicans have lashed out at President Obama for the lost money.  They argue it's indicative of the President's overall budget incompetence.  They've launched a probe into the loan and the Department of Energy's overall loan infrastructure.  States Rep. Michael Burgess (R-Texas), a member of the House Energy panel’s investigative subcommittee, "We need to hear from Secretary Chu and [White House Office of Management and Budget Director Jack] Lew to fill in some of the blanks.  The buck has to stop someplace, and presumably it stops with the heads of those agencies."

But the POTUS is holding his ground.  In an interview on ABC News' "Good Morning America", also broadcast online on Yahoo! News Monday, anchor George Stephanopoulos asked President Obama if he regretted the 2009 loan guarantees .  He replies, "No I don't.  Because if you look at the overall portfolio of loan guarantees that had been provided, overall it’s doing well. And what we always understood is that not every single business is going to succeed in clean energy."

President Obama's administration is accused of rushing the loan guarantee in order to allow it to be announced at the September 2009 groundbreaking of the company's new factory.  By February the loan was already under investigation.  Still, the President stood firmly behind Solyndra, visiting their California headquarters in early 2010 and touting them as a green energy "leader".

Some emails that have been released indicate some administration members had expressed concerns about the company's financial health -- concerns that were ultimately overruled.

Obama implied America has to get more China-like when it comes to loans, in order to compete with the Asian rival.  He states. "If we want to compete with China, which is pouring hundreds of billions of dollars in this space, if we want to compete with other countries that are heavily subsidizing industries of the future, we have got to make sure that our guys, here in the United States of America, at least have a shot."

II. Editorial: Business as Usual in Washington, D.C.

To be fair, as bad as the Solyndra loss looks, the previous Bush administration spent many times that essentially paying off the losses of the American International Group (AIG), which it built up from taking on risky investments pre-recession.  AIG received over $127B USD [source] and sent over $100B USD overseas to banks it owed money to.

Thus perhaps the Solyndra debacle is more of a testament to how things are run in Washington no matter which party is in charge, rather than a sign that President Obama is somehow exceptional or different, for better or worse.  Both parties talk about balancing the budget, but it's a matter of public record that in recent years both parties have overspent, committing to risky investments and troubled assets.

That's not to say what the Obama administration did here was right by conservative fiscal standards.  As the old saying goes, two wrongs don't make a right.  But if there's someone who offers an alternative to this kind of spending they're likely not in Washington, D.C. -- or at least likely not very popular there among either party.

These kinds of wastes are particularly sad, as they come at a time when proud American science projects are being shuttered due of lack of funds.  America recently closed the world's second largest particle accelerator, because the government claimed it couldn't find $100M USD out of the $3.4T USD budget to pay for the accelerator's annual operating costs.  The AIG funding could have paid for over 1,000 years of operation.  The Solyndra funds could have extended the life of the accelerator 5 years.

One thing's for sure when it comes to Solyndra, though -- President Obama isn't going to say sorry for what happened.

Source: ABC News



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Must be nice
By sorry dog on 10/4/2011 11:43:55 AM , Rating: 2
...and in Dec 2008 the POTUS said...

quote:
"We are not going to simply write a bunch of checks and let them be spent without some very clear criteria as to how this money is going to benefit the overall economy and put people back to work. We're not going to be making decisions on projects simply based on politics and - and lobbying."


...how's that working out Mr. President??


RE: Must be nice
By Reclaimer77 on 10/4/11, Rating: 0
RE: Must be nice
By cooperaaaron on 10/5/2011 11:44:31 AM , Rating: 2
The only prick here is you. Bush has done and is STILL doing harm to this country with his unjust wars. Anyone here who believes the current President is destroying this country is wrong. Look at your wanna-be-presidents, a group of people whom won't win in 2012. Noone likes them, not even your own party! After the Republicans are voted out for NOT CREATING ANY JOBS, the platform they ran on in 2010, we can get this country rolling again !


RE: Must be nice
By sorry dog on 10/5/2011 12:25:18 PM , Rating: 2
While agree with you that ramifications of Bush's decisions are still with is, I don't understand how that relates to Obama being bullsht merchant or either me or Reclaimer being pricks because we are giving examples of said BS sales.

It's really not even a matter of opinion that part of Obama's platform in the last election was to reduce or eliminate earmarks from the budget and create jobs. Well...it appears pork spending is alive and well and as for jobs I think if you go ask anybody oil exploration industry around the Gulf Coast about Obama and jobs you might get an earfull.


RE: Must be nice
By Nfarce on 10/5/2011 12:41:09 PM , Rating: 2
Wrong, libtard. You go back and look at the data and this nation started going to hell when the Pelosicrats and Reidocrats took over Congress after the 2006 mid-terms.

Everything, and I do mean EVERYTHING Obummer has laid his community organizing hands on has been a DISASTER. (And that can go for Democrats overall as well). For example...You want to know why your banking fees are going up? Thank Barney Frank and Chris Dodd for the Frank-Dodd legislation passed by Democrat-controlled Congress and signed by Barry.

And regarding jobs, mouth breather, we've seen just how well you Fascistocrat Statist liberals have spent $860 BILLION on a FAILED stimulus/jobs bill. And now your heroes want to pass another "jobs" bill that does nothing but raise taxes. Oh I'm sorry, that was right up to when Dirty Harry Reid said NOT VOTE when the GOP told him to bring the vote on!

My GOD you petulant libtards are so ignorant and delusional it's almost humorous. If it wasn't so disastrous for this nation.


RE: Must be nice
By Nfarce on 10/5/2011 12:47:28 PM , Rating: 2
And another thing: how'd that Fast & Furious gun sales to illegal Mexicans and drug lords work out for you Democrats? Kinda backfired didn't it? It was nothing but a ploy to make gun dealers look bad and increase gun regulations. Instead, we have DEAD Americans who were shot with said guns, 2/3 of which disappeared into Mexico permanently. GREAT JOB!!!!

The sooner your incompetent empty suit Hackocrats are thrown out of office next year, the sooner this nation gets back on track. And by the way: aren't you supposed to be dressed up as zombie and disrupting commerce in New York City with the rest of the neo-Marxist/Leninist libDem freaks?


RE: Must be nice
By Reclaimer77 on 10/5/2011 12:43:00 PM , Rating: 1
You're so stupid I cannot even put into words my hate for you.

Democrats voted for those "unjust wars". Where was the vote to go into Libya, Obama? I guess it's Bush's fault that Obama not only extended every single policy of his, but started MORE wars?

quote:
After the Republicans are voted out for NOT CREATING ANY JOBS, the platform they ran on in 2010


Hey idiot, Government can't "create" jobs. Only the private sector can. The Republicans didn't run on directly creating jobs, they ran on stopping the Obama policies which are disastrous to private sector growth.

I don't care how many Republicans we vote in, the damage that the Stimulus and ObamaCare and everything else he's done isn't going to go away overnight. Have you seen our debt and deficits lately? Who's fault is that!?

Obama ran on stopping the wars and ending earmarks and corruption in Washington. He's STARTING wars and expanding corruption and pork barrel bills to record levels! Now what do you call that? That's called a liar and crook, that's what. And that's who Obama is. Nice guy? I don't give a shit. Good father? Fuc% you go home and play with your kids. You're the President!


RE: Must be nice
By Fost04mach on 10/6/2011 7:31:47 PM , Rating: 2
Amen.


"DailyTech is the best kept secret on the Internet." -- Larry Barber














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki