Apple Fights to Keep Details of Nokia Settlement From the Public
October 3, 2011 3:08 PM
comment(s) - last by
SEC is the only party who will likely be privy to the terms of closed-door deal
Apple, Inc. (
) has been quite active legally of late, carrying out a massive litigation war [
] with its top rivals who use Google Inc.'s (
) Android OS. But back in June, Apple was in court-endorsed settlement talks in a separate legal spat with Finland's Nokia Oyj. (
Formerly the world's top smartphone maker, Nokia was
bumped out of first place by Apple
. But in court it looked on the verge of victory, so Apple
opted to enter a cross-licensing agreement
could involve hundreds of millions of dollars in licensing payments to Nokia.
But here's the interesting thing: Nobody knew what the settlement was worth, as Apple did not disclose it in its legal mandated financial filings. Apple explains this away in that it felt the deal was in the "ordinary course of business" and not necessary to report to shareholders.
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
(SEC) wasn't happy with this response. It sent a frustrated
[PDF] to Apple in June asking for the company to share with it the missing information. It writes:
We note various news articles discussing the patent litigation settlement between Nokia and Apple. Supplementally tell us the amount and terms of such settlement agreement, any amounts accrued, the periods in which they were recognized, and the timeline of the negotiations with Nokia that led to the June settlement agreement. Also, tell us how you considered including a discussion regarding this matter in your MD&A [Management Discussion and Analysis] disclosures and financial statement footnotes, including disclosure of a reasonably possible range of loss in excess of amounts accrued. Further, tell us how considered disclosing this event in a Form 8-K or tell us how you determined that such disclosure was not necessary.
Apple complied filing
on July 12, but including a "request for confidential treatment for selected portions of this letter." In doing so Apple fought to keep details of the settlement out of the eyes of the public -- and its Android competitors.
Of course this isn't exactly uncommon in closed-door settlements in legal disputes between major corporations. Still the SEC, privy to the secret information, apparently felt Apple was holding back. It
[PDF] requesting more information, commenting:
Please describe in further detail the terms, arrangements, obligations and rights associated with the Settlement Agreement and Patent License Agreement entered into between the company and Nokia. Also, describe for us each element of these Agreements (i.e. settlement portion, past usage, future usage, etc.).
Apple fulfilled that request with
of non-public confidential information filed on August 1. On August 17 the SEC acknowledged receiving the document and
[PDF] that it was satisfactory. While not ruling out future inquiries against Apple, it now appears to be satisfied that it has sufficient details about the transaction.
As for the public, though, they are unlikely to ever find out what those details are, including how much per handset Apple is paying Nokia.
This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled
RE: Ho hum
10/3/2011 3:44:17 PM
They story is Apple having to pay up for infringment. Pot calling the Kettle black comes to mind.
RE: Ho hum
10/3/2011 3:55:42 PM
If patent infringement gets a company full of soot in this analogy then every major tech company is up to their necks in a pile of coal ash. Not that I'm on Apple's side by any means, but the fact of the matter is that the patent system is a horrible, convoluted maze where one misstep can lead to everyone's destruction.
The idea that the entire mobile phone industry is held together by good old 1980's cold war MAD logic is almost as stupid as Apple firing the first shot and thinking they could come out ahead. Patent litigation isn't a zero sum game, it's negative sum; the only ones who are going to come out a head when the dust settles are the lawyers.
“So far we have not seen a single Android device that does not infringe on our patents." -- Microsoft General Counsel Brad Smith
Samsung to Seek Sales Ban on iPhone 5
September 19, 2011, 10:03 AM
Apple Looks to Kill Samsung's Android Tablets and Phones in Britain
September 14, 2011, 4:10 PM
Samsung Files "3G" Lawsuit Against Apple in France, Appeals German Tablet Ban
September 13, 2011, 12:04 PM
Apple's Lawyers Take Quest to Kill Android to Japan
September 8, 2011, 10:15 AM
Apple Succeeds in Killing Samsung's Australian Tablet Sales With Lawsuit
August 1, 2011, 11:57 AM
Retiree Sues Apple For $7,500 for Wiping Honeymoon Photos From His iPhone
November 30, 2015, 10:23 AM
iPhone 7 May Pack 3-4 GB Memory, More Storage; 4-Inch Comeback is Rumored
November 20, 2015, 10:12 PM
OnePlus One, OnePlus 2 Will Receive Android Marshmallow in Q1 2016
November 16, 2015, 9:58 AM
Lenovo Whoa: Motorola Droid MAXX 2 and Turbo 2 Break Cover in Leaks
October 26, 2015, 3:12 PM
Leak: Apple Preps for First Real Android App Foray With New Apple Music App
October 24, 2015, 1:59 PM
Pepsi Smartphone? Empty Calories Coming Soon to the Midrange
October 12, 2015, 11:41 PM
Latest Blog Posts
Sceptre Airs 27", 120 Hz. 1080p Monitor/HDTV w/ 5 ms Response Time for $220
Dec 3, 2014, 10:32 PM
Costco Gives Employees Thanksgiving Off; Wal-Mart Leads "Black Thursday" Charge
Oct 29, 2014, 9:57 PM
"Bear Selfies" Fad Could Turn Deadly, Warn Nevada Wildlife Officials
Oct 28, 2014, 12:00 PM
The Surface Mini That Was Never Released Gets "Hands On" Treatment
Sep 26, 2014, 8:22 AM
ISIS Imposes Ban on Teaching Evolution in Iraq
Sep 17, 2014, 5:22 PM
More Blog Posts
Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. -
Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information