Amazon to Lose ~$50 per Kindle Fire Sold, Apple Gets ~$150 per iPad 2 Sold
September 29, 2011 8:12 AM
comment(s) - last by
Despite losses, strategy could pay off for the enterprising Android tablet maker
Yesterday, following Amazon.com, Inc.'s (
big tablet reveal
, Gene Munster, a Piper-Jaffray analyst known for his estimates of Apple, Inc.'s (
) sales, sent out a research note comparing the profitability of Apple's $500 iPad 2 with Amazon's $200 Kindle.
Mr. Munster estimated that the iPad 2 was turning a profit of 30 percent of its MSRP, while Amazon would lose $50 per Kindle Fire sold. However, he didn't provide a specific source of his figures or much of an explanation.
We dug into this a bit more. It turns out that
did teardowns [
this year's iPad 2
last year's Galaxy Tab
from Samsung Electronics Comp., Ltd. (
's numbers are hardly infallible, but given that the LCD market hasn't move much price-wise in the last year, for tablet screens, it can be assumed that the Galaxy Tab's 7-inch display cost in the bill-of-materials gives a good estimate of what the LCD touch-screen unit on the Kindle Fire costs. Combining this with the extra cost of the iPad 2's largest amount of onboard NAND memory, we estimate that the difference is indeed in the neighborhood of $100.
So what does this mean for Amazon.com -- and for Apple? Well, for Apple it's a testament of
how valuable the company's brand is
. Apple can have its cake and eat it too. It can sell a grossly marked up device, and at the same time post the kind of huge sales that brings in strong auxiliary revenue streams such as app sales and advertising revenue.
Apple doesn't have to offer big price cuts to get customers to bite.
[source: Entercom Digital Dev Blog]
Amazon.com isn't that fortunate. Despite arguably launching the consumer tablet with its Kindle e-Reader, Amazon.com has yet to establish itself as a major competitor in the new tablet market, which has been dominated by Apple and Samsung.
In order to gain ground Amazon.com appears to be adopting an approach similar to console makers in that it's
pocketing a loss up front
, in order to persuade early adopters to jump on board, leading to overall positive revenue via the auxiliary revenue streams.
Overall this approach could pay off for Amazon.com. The Kindle Fire is currently the cheapest fully functional Android tablet device on the market and its software offers nice differentiation over competive offerings.
Amazon pockets 30 percent of app sales revenue. And it gets $79 for its Amazon Prime membership, which it's promo-ing on the tablet (which provides users with streaming movies and TV episodes). If it can get one in every two customers to bite on the Amazon Prime membership, and get the average customer to spend $33 on apps over the device lifetime, it's broken even. If it can do
data mining on the users' web-browsing
, or sell users some of its massive ebook collecton, it will likely turn a profit (under the above scenario).
In short, the "fire-sale" price of Amazon.com might not be such a crazy idea after all. Maybe Hewlett-Packard Company (
) unwittingly stumbled onto the secret to tablet success after all,
during its TouchPad fire-sale
This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled
9/29/2011 5:56:41 PM
They didn't design squat.
A good friend of mine spent several years writing patents for Embarq Telecom. It had nothing to do with research or even products. They were just trying to throw ideas onto paper and hope the application will get accepted. That's all these damn patents are anyway, some stupid idea or a combination of current products behaviors and potential future products. Just read the patents Apple has on the iPad. It is complete rubbish. Minimalist design, whatever. Does someone hold a patent for a round container to hold liquid? There is little difference. Multitouch might actually be worthy of a patent, except it had already been done by someone else and NOT patented BACK IN THE 80s!
"Spreading the rumors, it's very easy because the people who write about Apple want that story, and you can claim its credible because you spoke to someone at Apple." -- Investment guru Jim Cramer
Amazon's New "Silk" Browser Gets Speedy Mobile Browsing Via the Cloud
September 28, 2011, 2:44 PM
Amazon Launches $199, 7" Kindle Fire Tablet
September 28, 2011, 9:58 AM
16GB, 32GB HP TouchPads Drop to $99, $149 Starting Tomorrow
August 19, 2011, 8:02 PM
Top 100 Brands Survey Names Apple Most Valuable Brand
May 9, 2011, 10:03 AM
Apple Announces iPad 2
March 2, 2011, 1:15 PM
Retiree Sues Apple For $7,500 for Wiping Honeymoon Photos From His iPhone
November 30, 2015, 10:23 AM
iPhone 7 May Pack 3-4 GB Memory, More Storage; 4-Inch Comeback is Rumored
November 20, 2015, 10:12 PM
OnePlus One, OnePlus 2 Will Receive Android Marshmallow in Q1 2016
November 16, 2015, 9:58 AM
Lenovo Whoa: Motorola Droid MAXX 2 and Turbo 2 Break Cover in Leaks
October 26, 2015, 3:12 PM
Leak: Apple Preps for First Real Android App Foray With New Apple Music App
October 24, 2015, 1:59 PM
Pepsi Smartphone? Empty Calories Coming Soon to the Midrange
October 12, 2015, 11:41 PM
Most Popular Articles
Free Windows 10 offer ends July 29th, 2016: 10 Reasons to Upgrade Immediately
July 22, 2016, 9:19 PM
Smart Security Cameras: 5 Good Choices For Any Budget
July 25, 2016, 7:13 PM
2017 Porsche Panamera: I’ll Take Three of These.
July 24, 2016, 6:44 PM
Top 5 Smart Watches
July 21, 2016, 11:48 PM
5 Excellent Cable Modems: Buy Your Own and Avoid Rental Fees
July 28, 2016, 8:44 PM
Latest Blog Posts
Sceptre Airs 27", 120 Hz. 1080p Monitor/HDTV w/ 5 ms Response Time for $220
Dec 3, 2014, 10:32 PM
Costco Gives Employees Thanksgiving Off; Wal-Mart Leads "Black Thursday" Charge
Oct 29, 2014, 9:57 PM
"Bear Selfies" Fad Could Turn Deadly, Warn Nevada Wildlife Officials
Oct 28, 2014, 12:00 PM
The Surface Mini That Was Never Released Gets "Hands On" Treatment
Sep 26, 2014, 8:22 AM
ISIS Imposes Ban on Teaching Evolution in Iraq
Sep 17, 2014, 5:22 PM
More Blog Posts
Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. -
Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information