backtop


Print 69 comment(s) - last by chuckecheeze.. on Oct 16 at 4:17 AM

You won't hear Steve Ballmer say "I love this DEAL!" but Samsung's agreement to pay licensing fees is a big win

"Under my thumb
The girl who once had me down
Under my thumb
The girl who once pushed me around."

-- Mick Jagger and Keith Richards of The Rolling Stones, 1966

The iconic track by The Rolling Stones comes to mind as news of Microsoft Corp.'s (MSFT) new licensing deal with Samsung Electronics Comp., Ltd. (SEO 005930) broke today.  After all, Samsung is top seller of smart phones powered by Google Inc.'s (GOOG) Android OS, which quite literally has Microsoft's Windows Phone 7 smart phone OS down in sales.

But as much as Android has pushed Microsoft around in the market, Microsoft now has Android exact where it wants it -- under its thumb.  It announced [press release] today that after negotiations, Samsung had agreed to enter an intellectual-property cross-licensing agreement.

The old saying goes "you'll attract more flies with honey than vinegar".  While Microsoft's licensing pressure might not seem so sweet to some, it's at least a gentler approach than Apple, Inc. (AAPL), which has sued [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8] the top three Android manufacturers (Samsung, HTC Corp. (SEO:066570), and recent Google acquisition Motorola) seeking to ban their handsets sales with nary a mention of a licensing settlement.

Indeed Microsoft's approach won over HTC, who was facing a lawsuit from Apple at the time, and now has won over Samsung, the fastest growing handset maker on the market, and the top maker of Android smart phones.

Reportedly the HTC deal was worth $10 USD per handset sold.  For the Samsung deal Microsoft reportedly offered a $15 USD per handset fee, while Samsung countered with a $10 USD per handset fee.  It seems likely that the pair met in the middle with a $12-13 fee.

Samsung and HTC both make Windows Phone 7 handsets, though, those devices haven't sold anywhere near the number of units as their flagship Android devices.

Of Android's "big three", only Google subsidiary Motorola remains without a licensing deal for Microsoft's intellectual property.  The Wall Street Journal is reporting that Microsoft used the announcement as a chance to issue a request/threat to Google/Motorola pressuring it to license.

For Google the situation could be worse.  It still will likely be able to turn a profit on its handsets and it will be free to focus on Android's other legal foes like Oracle Corp. (ORCL) (who is suing Google for Android's use of Java) and Apple.  But it's also not a very pleasant situation as Microsoft's licensing fees tack between $10 and $15 in additional costs onto each handset sold.  Those costs make Google's platform less attractive and competitive offerings more attractive.

Microsoft's Windows Phone Division President, Andy Lees, gushed about the deal, commenting, "Microsoft and Samsung see the opportunity for dramatic growth in Windows Phone and we’re investing to make that a reality. Microsoft believes in a model where all our partners can grow and profit based on our platform."

And Samsung tried to spin the news enthusiastically, with Samsung mobile devices global marketing VP Dr. Won-Pyo Hong remarking, "Through the cross-licensing of our respective patent portfolios, Samsung and Microsoft can continue to bring the latest innovations to the mobile industry. We are pleased to build upon our long history of working together to open a new chapter of collaboration beginning with our Windows Phone "Mango" launch this fall."

However, make no mistake, Microsoft is the winner here, and at the end of the day Google, and to a lesser extent, Samsung, are the losers.  Sure Microsoft would love Windows Phone 7 to be the kind of ringing success it thus far hasn't been.  That would give it all sorts of auxiliary revenue streams -- say from data mining and app sales.  But at the end of the day Android succeeding is almost as valuable to Microsoft, as it will get a sweet licensing cut of virtually every Android device sold -- without having to go to the hassle and expense of actually designing, advertising, and selling the product.


Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Nobody loses.
By Reclaimer77 on 9/29/2011 4:22:13 PM , Rating: 1
You really are a moron. You think Apple, who's entire existence relies on consumer devices, is "larger" than Microsoft simply because they are more profitable? Microsoft's patent portfolio alone dwarfs Apples. It's worth on the open market is incalculable. Microsoft develops operating systems and business solutions relied on by the entire world. You're beloved Apple makes a phone and a line of PC's that nobody buys running an OS almost unheard of in the business sector, congratulations.

Microsoft was split in HALF by the Federal Government and is still the worlds largest software developer, technology innovator, and business partner. The world as it is today could absolutely NOT function without Microsoft. They have made themselves utterly indispensable.

And you think Apple is "bigger"? I swear the value you morons place on disposable consumer devices is absurd. You and Tony talk as if we simply cannot exist without iDevices. Look around! Apple is in an extremely volatile market with competition closing in all around them. Just how long do you honest think they are going to be able to ride this high?

quote:
No wonder Swash is laughing at us techies.


Swash laughing? More like crying himself to sleep. The guy is an idiot and for you to put him in a favorable light shows how typically backwards you are.


RE: Nobody loses.
By Pirks on 9/29/2011 5:10:30 PM , Rating: 2
I see you love to argue with Big Money. Be my guest. No matter what you say about HUGE MS and tiny Apple who no one cares about - Big Money still says Apple makes way more money than HUGE MS.

You can argue with money and numbers all you want, but no analyst or investor will pay attention to all your crying and whining. Wall Street and industry see the mighty Apple with trucks and trains of money, and they see the HUGE MS that has... smaller trucks of money. Oops.

They don't care about your hot air rhetoric with the world depending on MS to survive and human race and blah blah, they don't give a sh!t about that drama of yours. They only see past performance where Apple was growing leaps and bounds and outgrown even MS, and where MS was stagnating since 2000.

One company stagnates and makes lotsa money. The other is growing with no end in sight and makes even more money. And sadly no one cares about your drama with world depending on MS. Money talks, Reclaimer, money talks.

Keep arguing with money, you are just wasting your time. Money. Always. Wins.

Remember that.
quote:
Microsoft was split in HALF by the Federal Government
Are you on crack? Who split MS? When? Sheesh, get some sleep man... this is worse than I thought.
quote:
Apple is in an extremely volatile market with competition closing in all around them
Yeah, Apple spent the whole life in this volatile market with competition closing in and stuff, so what? Did this hinder their ability to raise above the others? Not at all. So I don't see your point then. What was it?


"Young lady, in this house we obey the laws of thermodynamics!" -- Homer Simpson














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki