quote: Apple would just ban the infringer and get more sales this way, i.e. indirect money infusion via increased sales. I don't see any advantages of one approach over the other, they both look very similar to me
quote: Android will NOT get "banned"
quote: That solution is costly, creates huge consumer backlash, and is destined to fail
quote: it limits MY choices as a consumer and drives up prices, so why would I support such an action?
quote: The idea that you think forcing consumers to buy your product has ever worked is amazing to me. Or that it's a solid plan of action
quote: Working against the free market can only work if you're selling something like oil
quote: So you're just supporting some draconian measure and applying moral relativism to it