U.S. Senators, Microsoft Accuse Google of Anticompetitive Tactics
September 23, 2011 12:06 AM
comment(s) - last by
Microsoft says Google unlawfully overcharged it for advertisements
U.S. antitrust regulators are looking into whether Google unlawfully increased advertising rates 50-fold for Microsoft Corp., according to
Earlier this year, Microsoft
filed an antitrust complaint against Google
in Europe saying that the Internet giant was dominating the search market as well as other areas such as the mobile-related realm. Around that same time, the U.S. jumped in on the Google antitrust bandwagon when Senator Mike Lee (R-Utah) called for a hearing on Google's possible anti-competitive practices.
The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) began investigating the accusations against Google's behavior on June 24, 2011, sending subpoenas to several companies including Microsoft. The FTC is looking to figure out whether or not Google ranks its own search results above rivals' results, and whether or not Google uses its control of the Android mobile OS to discourage smartphone makers from using other applications. Overall, the FTC hopes to reveal (with the help of companies like Microsoft) whether Google has been abusing its dominant position in many different areas.
The U.S. Senate
prepared to question Google
and Executive Chairman Eric Schmidt earlier this week regarding these antitrust issues. In a U.S. Senate Judiciary antitrust committee hearing this week, U.S. lawmakers further criticized Google claiming that Google favors its own services over rivals when it comes to search.
Now, the FTC is investigating a few specific complaints from Microsoft, one of which claims that Google unlawfully increased advertising rates 50-fold for Microsoft. This complaint is part of the larger ongoing investigation of Google's possible anti-competitive practices.
Microsoft initially complained about the increased ad rate back in 2007. According to Microsoft, the cost for placing a Windows Live ad next to search results for the word "Hotmail" went from 10 cents per mouse click to $5 per mouse click.
anonymous source said during that time, Google told Microsoft that the price increase was due to users being directed to a low-quality website when clicking on the ad -- but the website was the homepage for Windows Live, which includes Hotmail.
Adam Kovacevich, a Google spokesman, said that he was unaware of the details of Microsoft's allegations concerning the ads, but noted that rates are usually partially determined by how closely an ad is related to a user's search.
Microsoft Spokesman Jack Evans said that Google shouldn't be allowed to continue
from "innovating and offering competitive alternatives."
The FTC is also investigating Microsoft's complaint that Google pressured advertisers to partake in contracts that make it challenging to advertise with rivals like Yahoo and Bing. In addition, Microsoft accused Google of producing hurdles that
from comparing the number of times users click on their ads they run on Google as opposed to other rival sites.
Google claimed 59 percent of the U.S. online search advertising revenue in the second quarter of this year while Microsoft claimed 9 percent and Yahoo claimed 7 percent.
This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled
RE: I like it when..
9/23/2011 3:04:31 PM
It's nothing new, Microsoft (and formerly Yahoo before being bought) did the same exact crap. Why would you NOT list your company first? Nobody said they couldn't advertise using their own browsers, search engines, etc. Consumers catch on, and use something else. Free market.
RE: I like it when..
9/28/2011 11:21:45 AM
I don't think they should be unable to advertise on the most used search engine in the world, they should just make it obvious and seperate it from actual search results as a courtesy to their users.
Essentialy throw it right in with the paid-for ads, you know, the ones that also get preferential treatment. That's all.
I'm sure there are logistical reasons why they may not (they potentially sacrifice a paid ad spot or 'bombard' users with more ads) but I still think this is the better solutions. I only like Google for relevant information. Nothing else.
"We basically took a look at this situation and said, this is bullshit." -- Newegg Chief Legal Officer Lee Cheng's take on patent troll Soverain
U.S. Senate Prepares to Grill Google, Eric Schmidt on Antitrust Issues
September 19, 2011, 2:34 PM
South Korea's Antitrust Investigation Into Google Heats Up With Raid
September 7, 2011, 12:51 PM
Google Expects to Pay at Least a $500M USD Fine for Antitrust Offenses
May 11, 2011, 1:51 PM
Microsoft Files Antitrust Complaint Against Google in Europe
March 31, 2011, 3:35 AM
Twitter Senior VP: "Diversity is Important, But We Can’t Lower the Bar"
November 9, 2015, 9:59 AM
CNN Resorts to Internet Censorship to Promote Clinton Over Senator Sanders
October 15, 2015, 2:47 PM
Breaking Bad: How to Crash Google's Chrome Browser With Just 8 Characters
September 23, 2015, 11:08 AM
Quick Note: Amazon UK Offers £10 Back on Any Order £50 or Over
August 3, 2015, 12:05 PM
Editorial: Reddit Allows Itself to be Hijacked as a Hate Platform For Racist Bigots
July 21, 2015, 6:32 PM
Mozilla and Facebook to Adobe: It's Time to Kill Flash
July 20, 2015, 6:30 PM
Latest Blog Posts
Sceptre Airs 27", 120 Hz. 1080p Monitor/HDTV w/ 5 ms Response Time for $220
Dec 3, 2014, 10:32 PM
Costco Gives Employees Thanksgiving Off; Wal-Mart Leads "Black Thursday" Charge
Oct 29, 2014, 9:57 PM
"Bear Selfies" Fad Could Turn Deadly, Warn Nevada Wildlife Officials
Oct 28, 2014, 12:00 PM
The Surface Mini That Was Never Released Gets "Hands On" Treatment
Sep 26, 2014, 8:22 AM
ISIS Imposes Ban on Teaching Evolution in Iraq
Sep 17, 2014, 5:22 PM
More Blog Posts
Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. -
Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information