AT&T LTE Beats Verizon LTE in Speed Tests
September 20, 2011 10:20 AM
comment(s) - last by
Tests show AT&T's Momentum 4G LTE modem consistently beating Verizon's LTE offerings in data speeds, in Texas at least.
Of course, AT&T has "home court" advantage in the "Lone Star State".
(Source: Federal Highway Administration)
Verizon's LTE coverage (bottom, yellow dots) is much broader geographically than AT&T's 4G coverage (orange dots, top), which is only available in five cities.
(Source: AT&T, Verizon)
However, there's a major catch when it comes to AT&T's win
AT&T Inc.'s (
new LTE network
out for a spin. They decided to take the company's LTE network for a spin in Houston, Texas to test it speeds. Comparing the AT&T 4G to Verizon Communications Inc.'s (
) own 4G offerings, they found that AT&T handily won.
AT&T's 3G network already has showed itself to be the nation's fastest data network, being nearly three times faster than Verizon in some tests.
The AT&T 4G network is similarly impressive. It hit peak download speed of 42.85 Mbps (on the Momentum 4G modem) and an average download speed of 24.65 Mbps, while the Verizon network only mustered a peak of 23.81 Mbps (with the UML290 modem) and an average of 16.70 Mbps. Uploads showed an even broader gap, with 11.44 Mbps for the AT&T modem versus 4.01 Mbps for the Verizon modem.
In short, AT&T was about 50 percent faster in downloads, and almost three times as fast in uploads.
But there's a catch and it's a rather big one -- AT&T's LTE coverage is reportedly the strongest in Texas, as it is home to Southwestern Bell (headquartered in Dallas), the core company that grew into AT&T via two decades of acquisitions and mergers. So consider these results the best case scenario of sorts.
Following the trend from Texas, coverage in Atlanta, Georgia, home of BellSouth -- another Baby Bell -- is reportedly quite strong. Other headquarters of former Baby Bells turned AT&T acquisitions aren't faring quite so well. Chicago's coverage is reportedly significantly slower than Texas's. AT&T blames this on lack of available spectrum. It says that in Chicago it's using paired 5 MHz blocks of spectrum, versus Verizon, which is using paired 10 MHz blocks of spectrum.
Another general issue with AT&T's network is general lack of coverage. AT&T's 4G covers 70 million people, while Verizon's covers 160 million -- approximately half of the nation.
Sprint Nextel Corp. (
) currently covers 120 million Americans with 4G, but its WiMax network is reportedly
much slower than Verizon's LTE
. T-Mobile covers 200 million Americans with its HSPA+ 4.2 network which is reportedly
slightly speedier than Sprint
, but still slower than LTE.
AT&T cites these problems as justifications for its proposed merger with
Deutsche Telekom AG's (
) T-Mobile USA
, which is currently being blocked by a U.S. Department of Justice
This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled
RE: Wait, what?
9/20/2011 5:36:38 PM
I'd say the moral of the story is that Verizon is faster in places where about 90 million people can't get ATT's 4G service. Whether or not you can get LTE is probably more important than minor speed differences...
RE: Wait, what?
9/21/2011 7:01:18 AM
It's not a minor speed difference really. In places where Verizon offers 3G service, AT&T beats Verizon for the most part, in some cases significantly. The only places where Verizon is faster is in 4G areas, or in the number of places where AT&T has not added more fiber, which IS a good percentage of the network.
Now, we all know the maps are garbage when it comes to areas that they CLAIM have service but you get 0-1 bar, meaning you really get no service there, but the AT&T map DOES show that there are many areas without Verizon service that AT&T does provide service.
"I'd be pissed too, but you didn't have to go all Minority Report on his ass!" -- Jon Stewart on police raiding Gizmodo editor Jason Chen's home
AT&T's LTE Network to Power Up September 18
September 15, 2011, 3:46 PM
DOJ Files Paperwork to Kill AT&T/T-Mobile Merger; AT&T, Sprint Respond
August 31, 2011, 11:21 AM
Inspiron Laptops & 2-in-1 PCs
September 25, 2016, 9:00 AM
The Samsung Galaxy S7
September 14, 2016, 6:00 AM
Apple Watch 2 – Coming September 7th
September 3, 2016, 6:30 AM
Apple says “See you on the 7th.”
September 1, 2016, 6:30 AM
Apple sued because of iPhone 6 Touch Disease
August 31, 2016, 7:00 AM
Get Ready to wait in line – iPhone 7 due September.
August 18, 2016, 7:15 AM
Most Popular Articles
Update: Problem-Free Galaxy Note7s CPSC Approved
September 22, 2016, 5:30 AM
FDA Cleared, Shockwave Lithoplasty for Peripheral Vascular Disease
September 22, 2016, 5:45 AM
Walmart may get "Robot Shopping Carts?"
September 17, 2016, 6:01 AM
Are you ready for this ? HyperDrive Aircraft
September 24, 2016, 9:29 AM
Smartphone Screen Protectors – What To Look For
September 21, 2016, 9:33 AM
Latest Blog Posts
Burlington Gun Attack
Sep 27, 2016, 5:00 AM
Who is in Risk of Getting Oral Cancer?
Sep 23, 2016, 6:02 AM
France Bans Plastic Eating Utensils in Restaurants
Sep 18, 2016, 10:49 AM
Progress Against Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Sep 17, 2016, 5:30 AM
Apple Watch Series 2 - Number 1 in the Customer Satisfaction.
Sep 7, 2016, 6:19 PM
More Blog Posts
Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. -
Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information