backtop


Print 29 comment(s) - last by FaceMaster.. on Sep 16 at 6:19 PM

As Will.i.am says tech enthusiasts will be like "a kid in a candy shop" when they see all this new tech

It's invaluable to get the chance to network with a company and get a chance to witness their vision first hand.  When that company happens to be the world's largest maker of CPUs for traditional personal computers and servers, that opportunity goes from good to great.

At the 2011 Intel Developer Forum we've attended scores of Intel Corp. (INTC) keynotes, technical "deep-dive" sessions and other events, and we're excited at what we've seen.  Here's some of the highlights:

Ivy Bridge

Ivy Bridge is Intel's 22 nm processor, which is set to debut in the first half of next year.  A lot is already known about the chip.  It will be first to use Intel's tri-gate (3D) transistor (aka "FinFET") technology, which we detailed on Tuesday.

But one interesting thing Intel emphasized in its keynote was that while Ivy Bridge was a "tick" (die shrink) from an architectural perspective, the on-die GPU is a "tock".  The GPU has undergone a significant architectural design and appears to pack a lot more power.  In a demo Intel showed the GPU processing and displaying 20 high-definition video streams.

For gamers, a big improvement will be the inclusion of DirectX 11.  With Sandy Bridge, DX11 was largely pointless, as it lacked the processing might to put features like tessellation to good use.  Ivy Bridge's  GPU is quite a different story.



Ivy Bridge was shown off playing Tom Clancy's Hawx 2.  Of course this was a carefully prepared demo, but framerates looked smooth.  This leads us to believe that Intel has at least closed the gaps between Sandy Bridge (which can't even play DirectX 11 content) and rival Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.'s (AMD) top end A-Series of Fusion advanced processing units, which does pretty decent in HAWX 2 as well.



One thing Intel was plugging a lot was "hybrid" tablets, à la ASUSTEK Computer Inc.'s (TPE:2357) Eee Pad Transformer.  The basic idea here is to have a tablet, which can double as a laptop via a tailored keyboard (which may or may not be detachable.  This isn't exactly a new class of devices, but it has yet to see as significant sales as traditional tablets.

However, with Apple, Inc. (AAPL) having been granted sole ownership of "minimalist" tablets in Germany, and with other regions pending rulings, intellectual property may be one key obstacle to this class of devices.  Apple has made it clear that it will sue any tablet maker who "copies its design" (translation: any tablet maker who sees significant sales).

While this hybrid doesn't look much like an iPad, it does have a minimalist tablet face, a multi-touch screen, and a black bezel.  So don't be surprised if these designs see similar lawsuits and sales bans if they do well -- or unless the majority of world courts disallow Apple's litigious crusade.



A small but interesting side note, Intel insisted that Thunderbolt was on its way for Windows.  Thus far Apple has enjoyed exclusive access to the ultra-fast communications standard, which is an early implementation of Intel's LightPeak.

Upsides to Thunderbolt are that it is significantly faster than USB 3.0.  Downsides are that it relies on specialized multi-chip cables that cost $50 USD.



In the realm of future hard drives, SATA is going to be faded out and replaced with connections over PCIe.  Intel is currently going the Advanced Host Controller Interface -- a hardware abstraction layer to manage connections to PCIe hard drives.  Peripheral models employing this tech are coming soon.  They will work with standard eSata cables, but will connect using PCIe lanes.



Obviously this is a inferior solution in the long term.  In that realm Intel is looking to deploy a drivers technology called NVMe.  The tech should offer much more efficient file I/O with hard drives on PCIe connections.  A reference driver is currently complete for Linux which supports 2X PCIe lane transfers.  Intel's engineers say that they are currently working on a similar reference driver for Windows 7, though it isn't complete. 



In related news, Intel was showing off tablets powered by Microsoft Corp.'s (MSFT) slick Windows 8 Metro user interface.  Animations on the x86 tablets looked very fluid (we saw one live in a small private setting).



The look of this tablet is far ahead of iOS 5 or even the relatively graphical Android 3.0 "Honeycomb".  When you consider that this slick GUI is bundled along-side the kind of fully-functional file browsing interface (via the accessible "traditional" Windows screen) that iOS and Android lacks, it won't be surprising if Windows 8 tablets are the hottest item come next year's holiday season.



Last, but not least, Intel happened to mention it had produced a Haswell chip.  While not due to hit the market till 2013, the 22 nm architecture redesign ("tock") promises to make a huge splash in two years.



We probed an Intel executive about whether Haswell would contain a "tick" GPU -- a die shrink -- given that Ivy Bridge packed a "tock" GPU.  The executive hinted that Intel liked to "mix things up" and that sticking to a static two year schedule is too predictable to the competition.  This hints that Haswell might have both CPU and GPU architectural revisions.  If so, that's very exciting news.

Coupled with the 22 nm Tri-Gate tech from the previous model, this should be some powerful bits of silicon when they hit the market.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Credit
By JasonMick (blog) on 9/15/2011 5:25:47 PM , Rating: 5
I took all of these images (today and yesterday), and edited them so copyright belongs to me and DailyTech.

I offer them unmodified free of charge to other sites under fair use provisions, as long as they retain our site's watermark and my logo.

If you wish to modify the image for use in a collage or other artistic work, please contact me and I'll send you an unwatermarked high-res PNG file to work with. Please respect my copyright and do not post unmodified copies without watermarks/logos.


RE: Credit
By bah12 on 9/15/2011 5:37:04 PM , Rating: 4
Interesting, usually most employers have clauses in their employee agreements that grant them sole copyright to art/work created while under their employment. In which case DT would have a copyright, but you wouldn't own any part of it.

Either way all good and well to watermark the work, but IMO it needs to be a bit more subtle. The DT part is too large, and your orange initials could use some toning down as it is fairly distracting. A watermark should not take away from the work, just my opinion though.


RE: Credit
By JasonMick (blog) on 9/15/2011 6:04:03 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
Interesting, usually most employers have clauses in their employee agreements that grant them sole copyright to art/work created while under their employment. In which case DT would have a copyright, but you wouldn't own any part of it.

Some of our staff our bound by that kind of contract. I on the other hand never signed away my work, but I give it to DailyTech co-ownership for a number of finer business reasons.

quote:
Either way all good and well to watermark the work, but IMO it needs to be a bit more subtle. The DT part is too large, and your orange initials could use some toning down as it is fairly distracting. A watermark should not take away from the work, just my opinion though.

I appreciate your opinion on the matter...

To be honest I'm not 100 percent happy with the size of my logo, but it took long enough to edit these images and get them up, and I wanted to share them with you guys.

I'm pretty much self taught in terms of design, photography, and digital image editing, so I'm slowly getting up to speed with those who did a professional program (I instead obtained a technical degree -- a CE BSE), but I'm still not as fast as say one Wired editor I once saw. :)

I would size it down a bit. As for the color, I kinda like it to be a tad bit distracting/eye-catching so as to uniquely identify my work, but if you have an idea of something less colorful that meets those criteria (eye-catching/distinctive) send it my way via URL and I'll consider restyling my logo.

As for the DT watermark, sadly the engine does not currently offer controls on its sizing -- it's based on the size of the image... I may perhaps personally apply the watermark in a more appropriate size via image editing software next time, but IDF 2011 is kinda one big rush.

Thanks again for the feedback though, and drop me a link if you have a style you'd suggest for a redesign...


RE: Credit
By Etern205 on 9/15/2011 10:54:04 PM , Rating: 2
How about making your logo bigger and then make it opaque so users can still focus on the image without getting distracted.
First I'm no where near the pro's but you can try it out with Paint.net
Use the 1st layer as the image and add another layer.
The 2nd layer for your logo. Once you have it, double click on the logo and you get a opacity slider. Use that to adjust the transparency of that logo. When done, merge the two layers and save it.


RE: Credit
By Etern205 on 9/15/2011 10:57:23 PM , Rating: 2
I meant to say "adjust its opacity" not "then make it opaque"


RE: Credit
By karielash on 9/16/11, Rating: -1
RE: Credit
By Etern205 on 9/16/2011 9:33:03 AM , Rating: 2
I gave a suggestion. Why don't you learn how to reply to the proper posters who worries about some "logo"!
And for getting a "bloody life"...
You can get yourself a bloody life first before telling others to.


RE: Credit
By karielash on 9/16/11, Rating: 0
RE: Credit
By geddarkstorm on 9/16/2011 2:14:21 PM , Rating: 2
I'm pretty sure if he has the ability to type at a keyboard that he's alive.


"If they're going to pirate somebody, we want it to be us rather than somebody else." -- Microsoft Business Group President Jeff Raikes














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki