backtop


Print 48 comment(s) - last by TSS.. on Sep 16 at 8:57 AM


Sean Duffy  (Source: telegraph.co.uk)
Sean Duffy, of Reading, Berkshire, pleaded guilty to two charges associated with trolling social networking sites for a dead teenage girl

A UK man has been jailed for 18 weeks after trolling pages set up on social networks for girls who have died. 

Sean Duffy, of Reading, Berkshire, 
posted negative comments on social networking site pages in remembrance of girls who have died, such as Worcester teenager Natasha MacBryde who killed herself by throwing her body under a train due to bullying reports the BBC. 

Duffy targeted the bereaved relatives of the deceased, which were people he did not know. Duffy would send hurtful emails or post provocative posts on sites like Facebook and YouTube in hopes of prompting emotionally loaded responses. 

In MacBryde's case, he called her a "slut" in one of his posts. He also posted a video on YouTube called "Tasha the Tank Engine," which depicted the children's character Thomas the Tank Engine with MacBryde's face on it. 

Duffy pleaded guilty on two counts of sending a communication of an offensive or indecent nature. The charges were related to the Facebook and YouTube posts about MacBryde. Duffy has been jailed for 18 weeks. 

The case places a spotlight on cyberbullying and trolling, which have become increasingly problematic in recent years as social networks and other electronic communication mediums become more widely used. 

"People feel 
protected by anonymity and the true nature of people comes to the fore," said Fevzi Turkalp, a technology expert from gadgetdetective.com. "Someone will go onto an Apple website and say something derogatory about Apple, knowing full well people on there will be fans of Apple, in order to provoke a response."

"Misuse of Internet sites can destroy teachers' confidence and professional reputation and provide yet another vehicle for false allegations against staff," added Chris Keates, General Security of the NASUWT teacher's union. "New cases of abuse, harassment and humiliation are emerging all the time."

Duffy never knew MacBryde or her family.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Who gets to decide what is offensive?
By rdhood on 9/14/2011 2:12:59 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
Who gets to decide what is offensive?


The person who receives his unsolicited email about a deceased teen relative gets to decide if it is offensive. In this case, they decided that the unsolicited email was, in fact, offensive.


By tastyratz on 9/14/2011 4:32:47 PM , Rating: 2
This is true.
I think people may be over-analyzing this... but it sounds to me a lot more like harassment with another title?


By YashBudini on 9/14/2011 6:27:13 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
The person who receives his unsolicited email about a deceased teen relative gets to decide if it is offensive.

The victim should determine to file charges. A jury determines if the behavior meets the criminal statute. or civil definition of harassment or whatever the case may be.


"If you can find a PS3 anywhere in North America that's been on shelves for more than five minutes, I'll give you 1,200 bucks for it." -- SCEA President Jack Tretton

Related Articles













botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki