Print 22 comment(s) - last by SilthDraeth.. on Sep 13 at 1:18 PM

Lexus GS 450h

Lexus GS 350 interior
Lexus hopes to turnaround sales slump with new models

Toyota's Lexus division has been having a rough year. For starters, the product line is aging and lacks the visual "punch" of many of competitors from Germany. As a result, both BMW and Mercedes have surpassed perennial luxury sales leader Lexus this year in sales. Part of this can be attributed to the devastating earthquake in Japan that hampered production, but the loss of momentum can mainly be blamed on the lack of new blood for the brand.

After teasing the LF-Gh concept in April, Lexus last month unveiled the first in a multi-pronged attempt to claw back at the luxury market. The 2012 GS 350 rides on an all-new platform (the engines are mostly carryover), and features an impressive new interior. Today, Lexus has unveiled the hybrid counterpart to the GS 350: the GS 450h.

The second-generation GS450h gets its motivation from a 3.5-liter V6 engine (Atkinson Cycle) and a water-cooled permanent magnet electric motor. Total system output is 338hp and is good enough to push the 4,190-pound midsize luxury sedan to 60 mph in 5.6 seconds. 

Interestingly, Toyota is still sticking with a NiMH battery pack for the GS 450h instead of lighter, and more powerful lithium-ion batteries like its competitors. Toyota is usually at the forefront of hybrid/battery technology, so we're assuming that the company decided to maximize cost cutting instead of maximum performance/efficiency.

“The all-new GS 450h will provide our customers with an exciting blend of performance and precision in a new hybrid package,” said Mark Templin, Lexus group vice president and general manager in the U.S. “With its dynamic exterior styling, roomy interior and advanced technology features, the GS 450h further demonstrates Lexus’ mastery of the luxury hybrid.”

Lexus will not only be battling diesel and hybrid models from Germany with the 2012 GS 450h, but it will also be battling the M Hybrid which has total output of 360hp and EPA ratings of 27/32/29 (city/highway/combined). Lexus has not yet released EPA numbers for the new 2012 GS 450h, but the existing model is rated at 22/25/23 (city/highway/combined).

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Exponential rise in popularity?
By MonkeyPaw on 9/12/2011 8:06:01 PM , Rating: 2
I find the green movement puzzling. Luxury Hybrids, 100 mile electrics, $20,000 solar panels on your house. I watched a TV series where a wealthy family bought a house, then tore it down to build a "Green" house. It cost way more, and the house that was there was just fine. People blow a fortune on these type of things, when these "green" things just might do more harm than the "polluting" item they are so superior to. what's the C-footprint of hybrid battery production? Solar panels might be nice until that first hail storm, and your investment is never recovered in real savings--try better windows, more insulation, and ceiling fans. Build a "green" house? Why not reuse all those houses that already exist, and just make them more energy efficient! Lots of them are built really well, out of trees that were cut down decades ago!

Don't get me wrong, there's nothing wrong with being environmentally friendly--but you don't need to bankrupt yourself to save the planet. Anyone remember "reuse, reduce, recycle"? Something new isn't always the answer!

RE: Exponential rise in popularity?
By Spuke on 9/12/11, Rating: 0
RE: Exponential rise in popularity?
By therealnickdanger on 9/13/2011 8:35:34 AM , Rating: 2
My family has been in the home construction and remodeling business for about 50 years. Most homes built today won't last half as long as houses built decades ago. Between the cheaply made materials, cheap labor, and other cost-cutting measures, you'll be lucky if your new roof isn't leaking within 10 years.

Age isn't the issue, but rather neglect. I've seen brand new homes in the inner city torn down within just a couple years. Between people literally sh*tting in the walls or letting pipes burst and not reporting it, there's plenty of ways for new homes to be worse than homes 60 years old.

Speaking of which, my home was built in 1954 and it's tight like a drum. The only thing I had to do upon moving in was replace a couple of corroding steel drain pipes and run new electrical and CAT6. All the appliances are updated, but almost everything else is original and working fine. Good foundation, good materials, good build quality, good neighborhood, attentive previous owners.

Yes, a newer home may have an efficiency advantage, but I could probably point out plenty of new and old houses alike that leak like sieves.

It's just like cars in some respect. Sure, you could sell your perfectly running 1977 Honda CVCC for $500 to buy a new $25,000 Prius... but is 10MPG really worth it?

RE: Exponential rise in popularity?
By Spuke on 9/13/2011 10:13:02 AM , Rating: 2
Yes, a newer home may have an efficiency advantage, but I could probably point out plenty of new and old houses alike that leak like sieves.
Oh I agree 100%. That's why I used the word "crappy" next to typical track home in my post. New homes might be more energy efficient but they're still crappy. But I've seen enough older homes that were obviously not built to any code to know that blanket statements about older homes being better is not true either.

RE: Exponential rise in popularity?
By danjw1 on 9/13/2011 12:40:48 PM , Rating: 2
Most "Luxury" hybrids don't get all that great gas mileage, in the mid 20s mpg. The Lexus CT, HS and RX as well as the Lincoln MKZ are the only ones that are rated greater then 30mpg. So, most high end hybrid buyers are not really all that concerned with the environment. I think the only reason they buy hybrids, is because they feel like it is the 'in' thing to do.

"Intel is investing heavily (think gazillions of dollars and bazillions of engineering man hours) in resources to create an Intel host controllers spec in order to speed time to market of the USB 3.0 technology." -- Intel blogger Nick Knupffer

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki