Print 58 comment(s) - last by EasyC.. on Sep 7 at 12:29 PM

Samsung Galaxy Tab 7.7
Samsung gets hit over the head again by Apple and a German court

Remember that striking new Samsung Galaxy Tab 7.7 that was unveiled just a few days ago at the IFA consumer electronics show in Berlin, Germany? Well, Samsung has already pulled the promotional material and prototypes off the show floor.

SlashGear first noticed this yesterday, and a spokesman for Samsung simply stated, "Samsung has removed the Galaxy Tab 7.7 from our stand at IFA. We cannot make any further comment as we have not received an official statement from the court.” 

Bloomberg confirmed that a Dusseldorf court on Friday granted Apple's request to add the Galaxy Tab 7.7 to the list of banned Samsung devices in Germany. As a result, Samsung is forbidden from selling or marketing the Galaxy Tab 7.7 in that country.

“Samsung respects the court’s decision,” said Samsung spokesman James Chung to Bloomberg. He went on to add that Apple's actions in this matter “severely limits consumer choice in Germany.” 

As its name implies, the Samsung Galaxy Tab 7.7 features a 7.7" Super AMOLED display with a 1280x800 resolution. The tablet also packs a 5,100 mAh battery, 1.4GHz dual-core processor, up to 64GB of storage, microSD slot, 802.11n, Bluetooth 3.0, rear- and front-facing cameras, and GPS. 

A court injunction in early August weighed heavily in Apple's favor, as it banned all sales and marketing of the Galaxy Tab 10.1 in the European Union. That ruling was largely scaled back, however, and was limited to just Germany (the Dusseldorf court did not have the authority to expand it's ban hammer to other entities in the European Union).

Outside of the European Union, Apple has also succeeded in preventing the sales and marketing of the Galaxy Tab 10.1 in Australia. Samsung later decided to give up fighting the injunction and will instead wait until a final ruling is handled down on September 26 regarding its fate in the country. 

Apple is on the warpath when it comes to protecting the sales of its cash cow iPad. Using rather "diplomatic" language, the Cupertino, California-based company in an April lawsuit chided Samsung; "Rather than innovate and develop its own technology and a unique Samsung style for its smartphone products and computer tablets, Samsung chose to copy Apple's technology, user interface and innovative style in these infringing products."

Apple delivered an even more snarky statement to journalist Ina Fried expressing its frustration with Samsung's "copy machine". "It’s no coincidence that Samsung’s latest products look a lot like the iPhone and iPad, from the shape of the hardware to the user interface and even the packaging. This kind of blatant copying is wrong, and we need to protect Apple’s intellectual property when companies steal our ideas.”

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

By superPC on 9/4/2011 10:54:10 AM , Rating: 5
the dutch court result was pro samsung. i bet this one will be similar.

that's because: prior art, legal precedence, common sense (come on, technologies serve some purpose and they serve them in the most efficient way possible, that's why LCD TV, washing machine, refrigerator, air conditioning unit, and water heater all look very similar from one brand to the next).

i really hope this patent war end soon.

RE: again?
By michael2k on 9/4/11, Rating: -1
RE: again?
By superPC on 9/4/2011 11:34:07 AM , Rating: 2
i guess you haven't read this: the dutch court already ruled on apple vs samsung case.

PS: dutch = netherlands (

RE: again?
By dark matter on 9/4/2011 12:53:15 PM , Rating: 2
It's patently obvious you're an Apple fan that has no clue.

RE: again?
By drycrust3 on 9/4/11, Rating: -1
RE: again?
By inighthawki on 9/4/2011 2:53:39 PM , Rating: 5
Uh, actually it DOES matter whether it's "new or original" because it means prior art, which means the patent is invalid, and should never have been passed. You sir are either incredibly ignorant or a huge fanboy to believe that Apple's patents are "valid" in any way here.

RE: again?
By amanojaku on 9/4/2011 11:40:38 AM , Rating: 5
The other day I was chatting with an iPhone 3GS owner who, without provocation, stated Apple's lawsuits are out of control. I was entering my number into her phone (we're classmates) when she asks me about them and says how crazy they are.

I almost proposed to her.

RE: again?
By Boze on 9/5/2011 12:13:22 PM , Rating: 2
You have found yourself a keeper.

RE: again?
By EasyC on 9/7/2011 12:29:26 PM , Rating: 2
Back on my 3rd date with my GF, she stated that she hated Apple for all the BS they pull and wishes they could just create competitive products at competitive prices without all the bully crap.

I knew then I loved her.

"Death Is Very Likely The Single Best Invention Of Life" -- Steve Jobs

Latest Headlines
Inspiron Laptops & 2-in-1 PCs
September 25, 2016, 9:00 AM
The Samsung Galaxy S7
September 14, 2016, 6:00 AM
Apple Watch 2 – Coming September 7th
September 3, 2016, 6:30 AM
Apple says “See you on the 7th.”
September 1, 2016, 6:30 AM

Most Popular Articles5 Cases for iPhone 7 and 7 iPhone Plus
September 18, 2016, 10:08 AM
No More Turtlenecks - Try Snakables
September 19, 2016, 7:44 AM
ADHD Diagnosis and Treatment in Children: Problem or Paranoia?
September 19, 2016, 5:30 AM
Walmart may get "Robot Shopping Carts?"
September 17, 2016, 6:01 AM
Automaker Porsche may expand range of Panamera Coupe design.
September 18, 2016, 11:00 AM

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki