backtop


Print 31 comment(s) - last by frobizzle.. on Sep 6 at 3:24 PM


Hey... this looks kind of familiar (Acer clones the MacBook Air).  (Source: Pocket Lint/Popular Mechanics)

Lenovo has the right idea, picking a dedicated mobile GPU. Unfortunately its pick is about the weakest dedicated GPU you can find, offering minimal gains over Intel's HD 3000.  (Source: Lenovo via Hot Hardware)
Acer hopes to use ultraportable to recover from netbook slump

Faced with an evaporating netbook market, Acer Inc. (TPE:2353) has dropped to fourth place in global, fifth place in U.S. sales.  In full scale panic mode, the company has vowed to transform itself to be more like Apple, Inc. (AAPL).

I. Acer Clones the MacBook Air -- Will it "Just Work"?

A critical first step in that transformation was revealed [press release] on Friday at Germany's IFA 2011 technology show in Berlin.  Acer pulled the wraps off its first "ultrabook", a slick ultra-portable mid-size laptop with decent power.

Dubbed the Acer Aspire S3, the ultrabook clearly targets Apple's popular MacBook Air, following it closely in looks.  It features a slender thin hybrid plastic-metal design, which pairs an outer light metal lid with a plastic body.  The lid is 17 mm tall at its thickest point (identical to the MacBook Air) and tapers to 13 mm.  

The S3 can be found in a 13.3-inch and 11.6-inch design.  They pack a 1376x768 pixel display.  The 13.3-inch model weighs "less than 1.4 kg (3 lbs.)", which, according to sources, is 1.35 kg (2.976 lb), to be precise.  That places it roughly in line with the 2.96 lb. 13.3-inch MacBook Air.

The trackpad could also be mistaken for the MacBook Air's, almost -- it features the same multi-touch capable flat glass design which disguises clickable buttons in the bottom half of the depressed rectangle. 

The peripheral ports are almost identical to the MacBook Air's with a 3.5 mm headphone jack, SD card slot, and twin USB 2.0 ports.  It trades Apple's proprietary ThunderBolt connector for a more widely used full-sized HDMI port.  There's 1.3 MP camera and microphone for Skype chats, just like the Air.  And likewise Bluetooth 4.0 connectivity is also supported.

The laptop features a 20 GB SSD, which holds the fast-booting Windows installation and media you want to play at faster speeds.  The Acer Green Instant On features leverages this to promise 2.5 second boot times from sleep and 6 second boots from deep sleep.  The battery promises 7 hours of life (identical) to the MacBook Air.

So what's different between the S3 and the MacBook Air?  Well, as we mentioned the case implementation is a bit divergent.  And the price is significantly lower -- 799 € (appr. $1,150 USD) for a model equipped with a 1.7 GHz ultra-low voltage (ULV) second-generation Core i5 CPU from Intel Corp. (INTC) and 4 GB of RAM.  

A comparable MacBook Air is $150 more, at $1,300.  However, the Acer comes with a slower 320 GB traditional HDD in its stock configuration, where the Apple comes with a 128 GB SSD.  Given the internal small-size SSD for the OS, about the affects of this swap should be limited to slower times for some application launches, large file saves, or large copies -- OS launch time will be spared.

The price on the fully loaded model is moderately attractive given the larger amount of RAM.  With a 240 GB SSD, 1.7 GHz ULV Core i7 CPU, and 8 GB of DDR3 RAM, you will have to spend 1199 € ($1,720 USD) -- versus $1700 USD for a comparable MacBook Air with a 256 GB SSD, but only 4 GB RAM.

Like Apple, the biggest disappointment in this portable is the lack of dedicated graphics, which will make GPU-accelerated applications like Photoshop, web browsers, and video games slower.

Acer must beware, its competitors -- Toshiba Corp. (TYO:6502) and ASUSTEK Computer Inc. (TPE:2357) both plan to launch similar ultraportables at under $1,000 USD.  

Also given Apple's propensity for suing competitors, it would be unsurprising to see Acer smacked with a lawsuit, given its remarkable similarity to Apple's MacBook Air.  Of course we've already stated that we feel such claims are legally baseless -- but Apple does have the tendency to make them.

II. Lenovo U300 Packs Graphics Punch

Lenovo Group, Ltd. (HKG: 0992) -- the fastest growing brand internationally -- pulled the wraps off an ultrabook of its own -- the slick U300

Retailing at $1,200 USD in its base configuration, the device is moderately pricey like its Acer and Apple competitors.  The design is lightweight and thin, but looks less MacBook Air clone-like than the Acer S3, as it features a shorter taper at the edges.

Overall the specs are similar to the competitors' designs, with one fairly significant difference.  The Lenovo U300 packs a Radeon 5470M (1 GB memory) dedicated graphics chip courtesy of Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (AMD).  

The bad news here is that the Radeon 5470M isn't really that much more powerful than the stock Intel HD 3000 (found in the Core series chips), barely edging it in some benchmarks.  Still, the idea of including a dedicated GPU is a worthy one, so Lenovo's design is important from the standpoint of supporting dedicated mobile GPUs, even if it picks the wrong chip for the job.

Hopefully similar designs will come along soon with beefier chips (e.g. NVIDIA Corp.'s (NVDA) GeForce 540M GT chip).

The Toshiba, Lenovo, Acer, and ASUSTEK products will all ship sometime this fall.


Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Why a discrete GPU?
By darunium on 9/5/2011 8:56:49 AM , Rating: 2
Why the call for a discrete graphics card? The whole point of the HD3000 integrated graphics is that for most users, a dedicated graphics card is unnecessary, adding only heat, weight, and cost. This was true even before sandy bridge. If you have a dedicated desktop - a cheaper proposition anyway - then all I want from my notebook is performance at my everyday tasks, not gaming.

I *hate* it when OEMs put in a discrete graphics card this is entirely useless anyway, only to say that it has a discrete card and hope most consumers won't examine the performance of that card. I would pay more for the same product *without* the card.

It's like the Asus U36SD - why the discrete GPU? Really? The GT520M? The HD3000 graphics outperform that anyway. For shame.




RE: Why a discrete GPU?
By redbone75 on 9/5/2011 4:15:51 PM , Rating: 2
I think you missed the point of it being called an "ultrabook." You might not need a discrete graphics card, but I'm sure there are many people out there that would like to have a little extra horsepower when doing some casual gaming. It's great that Intel is getting better at their graphics cores, but they're still not AMD or nVidia. Discrete graphics simply offer better performance than integrated graphics. End of story. The first Macbook Air had pretty poor performance for the (outrageous) price of being thin. It only got better because technology got better. OEM's don't just market to one demographic.

You say discrete cards add unnecessary heat, weight and cost. Notebook graphics cards don't add significant weight, and cost is dependent on just what grade of laptop we're talking about -- gamer, business, casual computing, etc -- that would require certain cards. As far as heat, that depends on what activity you're engaged in. Oh, and there is this feature called switchable graphics now.

I, for one, am happy that Intel is demanding certain specs. This keeps your cheaper companies from just throwing in the i5 and charging a premium for integrated graphics. At these prices the least consumers should get is a discrete card.


RE: Why a discrete GPU?
By TakinYourPoints on 9/5/2011 10:56:26 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
I think you missed the point of it being called an "ultrabook." You might not need a discrete graphics card, but I'm sure there are many people out there that would like to have a little extra horsepower when doing some casual gaming.


That's what larger notebooks are for. Trimming down on size reduces the amount of space for discreet GPUs, cooling, etc etc. The motherboard on things like the Macbook Air or Lenovo x220 are tiny.


"Let's face it, we're not changing the world. We're building a product that helps people buy more crap - and watch porn." -- Seagate CEO Bill Watkins














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki