backtop


Print 50 comment(s) - last by koli.. on Aug 24 at 4:23 AM


Apple has creatively doctored another photo to try to make Samsung look guilty of design patent infringement.  (Source: Apple via IDG)

Apple CEO Steve Jobs says his company is a master of stealing ideas. Apparently it's also becoming masters of using Photoshop to provide potentially perjurous doctored exhibits in court.  (Source: Sydney Morning Herald)

Using doctored images, Apple succeeded in convincing a German judge to ban sales of the Galaxy Tab 10.1 in Germany.  (Source: HiTech)
You're viewing it wrong!

Apple, Inc.'s (AAPL) chief executive and co-founder, Steven P. Jobs has bragged about his mastery of stealing ideas from others, stating [video], "Picasso had a saying - 'Good artists copy, great artists steal.' And we have always been shameless about stealing great ideas."

I. Apple Alters Reality With Photoshop

But stealing other competitors' ideas isn't the only thing Apple is good at.  Of late it's shown itself to be a burgeoning master of Photoshop.  It was caught in Germany doctoring images (playing with perspectives and stretching pictures) to make its competitor's product look like its own.

Now Apple has been caught yet again engaging in egregious editing images -- quite literally "stretching the truth" -- in the Netherlands.

The Netherlands court filing came as part of Apple's legal crusade [1][2][3][4][5] against Google Inc. (GOOG) and its hardware partners.  Unable to compete against Google's Android operating system on the free market, Apple has come up with the creative solution of trying to use lawsuits to remove Google from the market altogether.

In this particular case, Apple's victim was Samsung Electronics Comp, Ltd. (SEO 005930).  Apple accused Samsung of "slavishly" copying the iPhone 4.  It sued trying to ban Samsung's widely successful Galaxy S smart phone family from the market in the Netherlands.

But it appears, in reality, that it was Apple who was "slavishly" copying and pasting the Galaxy S into Photoshop.  The Galaxy S is a bit larger than the iPhone 4 (122.4 by 64.2 mm) and looked decidedly different, so Apple had its work cut out for it in order convince a judge that the phone was "copying" the iPhone's patented look -- a key claim in its case.

So it shrunk the Galaxy S down to iPhone size -- 115.5 by 62.1 mm.  It also cherry-picked an image of the iPhone 3G, a defunct model it has not produced since 2009, as that model had more rounded edges -- like the Galaxy S -- and unlike Apple's current production iPhone (the iPhone 4).

A careful read would reveal flaws in the visual exhibit -- Apple did at least admit in the text, that the Galaxy S has "some non-identical elements, such as the slightly larger dimensions."

But consider that the claims of design patent infringement are critical to the case, and that the picture came on page 77, it's possible by that point that a weary justice might not be reading the small print very carefully.  

II. Images Played Key Role in Sales Ban

The recent incident, like the previous photoshopping, was identified by Dutch IDG publication Webwereld.nl.  IDG quotes Mark Krul, a lawyer at the Dutch firm WiseMen and a specialist in IT and intellectual property law, who says the visual evidence was critical in a German court's decision to ban Samsung's tablet sales in the European Union via an ex parte injunction.

Mr. Krul was astonished that doctored images appeared in a separate filing, stating, "It surprises me that for the second time incorrect presentations of a Samsung product emerge in photographic evidence filed in litigation. This is not appropriate and undermines Apple's credibility both inside and outside the court room. Apple has certainly some explaining to do, if only to clear itself from the appearance of improper behavior."

The EU court has since changed its ruling to only banning sales in Germany.  And Samsung is actively fighting to reverse that ban.  A Samsung lawyer in the EU, Bas Berghuis of Simmons and Simmons, accused Apple of "manipulating visual evidence, making Samsung's devices appear more similar to Apple's."

A legal expert who spoke to IDC anonymously said that in patent law cases often visual exhibits are the main thing judges look at, as they're considered the point that the plaintiff wants to emphasize -- more so than the text.

While the discovery of its "creative" alterations may be bad news for Apple's legal chances, on the plus side its legal team may be able to find jobs for themselves as graphics designers, should they lose the case.  After all, they're building a pretty impressive portfolio of work, already.


Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

By JasonMick (blog) on 8/19/2011 3:26:47 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
Rather than the commentary of some lawyer, it's already been reported by news sites that the German judge made the ban decision on the Galaxy Tab based on physical examination of the devices themselves and not the pictures.

Err.. the BBC writes "it is understood that...[the judge did not use the visual evidence]" That phrase is like "It is believed that..." It's hardly definitive.

BBC could be right, IDG could be right, both could be partially right.

The IMPORTANT point is that Apple's and its legal representatives appears to have perjured themselves at least twice in court now, in their brashly anticompetitive quest to remove Android from the market.


By JasonMick (blog) on 8/19/2011 4:06:53 PM , Rating: 4
quote:
In the German case where the aspect ratio was distorted, some form of image manipulation is occurring.

In this Dutch case, that picture of the Galaxy S looks like a stock press kit shot. Probably this one:

Weak argument. They're who put the iPhone pasted next to it. So even if you argue that the the Samsung image is a press kit image, that doesn't change the fact that they pasted an image of the iPhone with misleading proportions next to it using image editing software.

At best that's sloppy and should result in the possible dismissal of the case, at worst they should be facing perjury penalties.

quote:
You can't expect a random Galaxy S press kit shot to match the same physical scale as a random iPhone 3G press kit shot when placed side to side for the filing.

Apple is who pasted the two in there. Are you telling me that they're too incompetent at Photoshop to show proper proportions?

You just admitted that that they may have engaged in "manipulation" in the German filing, and now you're claiming they don't know how to resize an image???

And why are they using the iPhone 3G, a phone that was defunct during all but a few days of the Galaxy S's time on the market?


By mircea on 8/20/2011 1:25:55 AM , Rating: 3
Being found with the same kind of tempering of the images in two different cases rules out "sloppiness" especially considering the fact that they were not sloppy enough to forget to change the default screens to ones that looks like an iPhone, use a discontinued line of product while they sell iPhone4 now, and the amount of distortion the Tab suffered just to align that row.

No intend there, you're right.


By tastyratz on 8/22/2011 9:53:07 AM , Rating: 2
So say they get perjured... how does something like this get handled? I always wondered that. Apple themselves? the individuals at apple whom are responsible?

I wonder if this is a directive from higher up or a "clever" move by the legal team? who swallows the bomb here?


By Granseth on 8/19/2011 4:08:04 PM , Rating: 3
except the images doesn't match. They changed the screen image (of the galaxy unit) from the press release image you posted.


"Vista runs on Atom ... It's just no one uses it". -- Intel CEO Paul Otellini














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki