Print 50 comment(s) - last by koli.. on Aug 24 at 4:23 AM

Apple has creatively doctored another photo to try to make Samsung look guilty of design patent infringement.  (Source: Apple via IDG)

Apple CEO Steve Jobs says his company is a master of stealing ideas. Apparently it's also becoming masters of using Photoshop to provide potentially perjurous doctored exhibits in court.  (Source: Sydney Morning Herald)

Using doctored images, Apple succeeded in convincing a German judge to ban sales of the Galaxy Tab 10.1 in Germany.  (Source: HiTech)
You're viewing it wrong!

Apple, Inc.'s (AAPL) chief executive and co-founder, Steven P. Jobs has bragged about his mastery of stealing ideas from others, stating [video], "Picasso had a saying - 'Good artists copy, great artists steal.' And we have always been shameless about stealing great ideas."

I. Apple Alters Reality With Photoshop

But stealing other competitors' ideas isn't the only thing Apple is good at.  Of late it's shown itself to be a burgeoning master of Photoshop.  It was caught in Germany doctoring images (playing with perspectives and stretching pictures) to make its competitor's product look like its own.

Now Apple has been caught yet again engaging in egregious editing images -- quite literally "stretching the truth" -- in the Netherlands.

The Netherlands court filing came as part of Apple's legal crusade [1][2][3][4][5] against Google Inc. (GOOG) and its hardware partners.  Unable to compete against Google's Android operating system on the free market, Apple has come up with the creative solution of trying to use lawsuits to remove Google from the market altogether.

In this particular case, Apple's victim was Samsung Electronics Comp, Ltd. (SEO 005930).  Apple accused Samsung of "slavishly" copying the iPhone 4.  It sued trying to ban Samsung's widely successful Galaxy S smart phone family from the market in the Netherlands.

But it appears, in reality, that it was Apple who was "slavishly" copying and pasting the Galaxy S into Photoshop.  The Galaxy S is a bit larger than the iPhone 4 (122.4 by 64.2 mm) and looked decidedly different, so Apple had its work cut out for it in order convince a judge that the phone was "copying" the iPhone's patented look -- a key claim in its case.

So it shrunk the Galaxy S down to iPhone size -- 115.5 by 62.1 mm.  It also cherry-picked an image of the iPhone 3G, a defunct model it has not produced since 2009, as that model had more rounded edges -- like the Galaxy S -- and unlike Apple's current production iPhone (the iPhone 4).

A careful read would reveal flaws in the visual exhibit -- Apple did at least admit in the text, that the Galaxy S has "some non-identical elements, such as the slightly larger dimensions."

But consider that the claims of design patent infringement are critical to the case, and that the picture came on page 77, it's possible by that point that a weary justice might not be reading the small print very carefully.  

II. Images Played Key Role in Sales Ban

The recent incident, like the previous photoshopping, was identified by Dutch IDG publication  IDG quotes Mark Krul, a lawyer at the Dutch firm WiseMen and a specialist in IT and intellectual property law, who says the visual evidence was critical in a German court's decision to ban Samsung's tablet sales in the European Union via an ex parte injunction.

Mr. Krul was astonished that doctored images appeared in a separate filing, stating, "It surprises me that for the second time incorrect presentations of a Samsung product emerge in photographic evidence filed in litigation. This is not appropriate and undermines Apple's credibility both inside and outside the court room. Apple has certainly some explaining to do, if only to clear itself from the appearance of improper behavior."

The EU court has since changed its ruling to only banning sales in Germany.  And Samsung is actively fighting to reverse that ban.  A Samsung lawyer in the EU, Bas Berghuis of Simmons and Simmons, accused Apple of "manipulating visual evidence, making Samsung's devices appear more similar to Apple's."

A legal expert who spoke to IDC anonymously said that in patent law cases often visual exhibits are the main thing judges look at, as they're considered the point that the plaintiff wants to emphasize -- more so than the text.

While the discovery of its "creative" alterations may be bad news for Apple's legal chances, on the plus side its legal team may be able to find jobs for themselves as graphics designers, should they lose the case.  After all, they're building a pretty impressive portfolio of work, already.

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Was the girl in the photo also photoshopped?
By smilingcrow on 8/19/2011 3:13:53 PM , Rating: 4
I thought Apple didn’t like Adobe?

RE: Was the girl in the photo also photoshopped?
By JasonMick on 8/19/2011 3:21:35 PM , Rating: 5
I thought Apple didn’t like Adobe?

Hint: Look at the chest and the blinds...

(It's a relatively famous "photoshop fail"... you can Google that phrase for hours of fun...)
I thought Apple didn’t like Adobe?

I know, right? Irony!

By smilingcrow on 8/19/2011 3:30:06 PM , Rating: 1
OK, the image is so small that I didn’t notice the anomaly.
I enjoyed the irony of seeing Photoshop in that context which is why I mentioned it. Not that I’m a fan of Flash (Aaagh, the destroyer of the Universe). And no I don’t like Queen either. ;)

RE: Was the girl in the photo also photoshopped?
By MrWho on 8/19/2011 4:08:10 PM , Rating: 3
Love Queen. As for Flash, I'm with you.

By paydirt on 8/19/2011 6:23:42 PM , Rating: 5
Again, why do these judges make million dollar+ rulings without even looking at the physical products for themselves?

By ph0tek on 8/20/2011 12:50:59 PM , Rating: 1
Cant wait to see what you sheeple start saying when HTML5 things like JavaScript and CSS animations start being used for ads instead of Flash as it wont be something you can block kids. Not only that but also performing worse and eating up more CPU cycles as it's vastly less efficient.

RE: Was the girl in the photo also photoshopped?
By warisz00r on 8/19/2011 10:46:26 PM , Rating: 2
It's 'saviour of the universe'

By smilingcrow on 8/20/2011 3:02:21 AM , Rating: 2
Not for Steve Jobs though! (context is king).

By amanojaku on 8/19/2011 3:32:05 PM , Rating: 1
Hint: Look at the chest and the blinds...
Huh, missed the blinds. I noticed the left boob and the camera strap looked funny, and the chest overall is off center. But, common, we're men. When have we ever criticized a fake chest? :-)
I thought Apple didn’t like Adobe?
Aperture? Corel? Photoshop is accepted as the best, but that hasn't stopped Steve before.

By sprockkets on 8/19/2011 4:25:02 PM , Rating: 3
Only when it helps them fuel the myth that photoshop works better on a mac.

"Mac OS X is like living in a farmhouse in the country with no locks, and Windows is living in a house with bars on the windows in the bad part of town." -- Charlie Miller

Latest Headlines
Inspiron Laptops & 2-in-1 PCs
September 25, 2016, 9:00 AM
The Samsung Galaxy S7
September 14, 2016, 6:00 AM
Apple Watch 2 – Coming September 7th
September 3, 2016, 6:30 AM
Apple says “See you on the 7th.”
September 1, 2016, 6:30 AM

Most Popular Articles5 Cases for iPhone 7 and 7 iPhone Plus
September 18, 2016, 10:08 AM
No More Turtlenecks - Try Snakables
September 19, 2016, 7:44 AM
ADHD Diagnosis and Treatment in Children: Problem or Paranoia?
September 19, 2016, 5:30 AM
Walmart may get "Robot Shopping Carts?"
September 17, 2016, 6:01 AM
Automaker Porsche may expand range of Panamera Coupe design.
September 18, 2016, 11:00 AM

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki