HP Buries WebOS, TouchPad
August 18, 2011 3:43 PM
comment(s) - last by
HP Pre 3
Acquired Palm unit lasted little more than a year
Hewlett-Packard Comp. (
[press release] on Thursday afternoon news that
some of us
saw coming. It was killing webOS.
I. From High Hopes to the Depths of Despair
HP acquired webOS, a smart phone (and later tablet-adapted) operating system from its purchase of struggling gadget-maker Palm, Inc.
for $1.2B USD in April, 2010
At the time the price seemed right for Palm, Inc. The company had tremendous industry experience having defined the PDA movement, which would later transform into the smart phone craze.
WebOS seemed like a winner --
billed its card system of multi-tasking as the best on the market, and praised features like "Synergy" and the unified messaging system (which combined im's, emails, texts, etc. into a single conversation stream). Sales were horrible, but the hope was with HP's brand might and expertise it would be able to make the attractive parts into a market winner.
However, in the end it was Palm's same flaws that led it to abysmal sales in the first place -- sloppy execution, overproduction, and a snail's pace of hardware releases -- that killed sales of its new HP-branded devices.
In the end enough was enough and during its quarterly earnings report on Thursday HP sealed the deal, discontinuing the Pre 3 smart phone, and the TouchPad.
II. Why Palm Failed on its Own
The news of webOS's demise is somewhat shocking because the operating system was once viewed as the strongest challenger to the iPhone. In late 2009 Palm, Inc. had just launched the
nearly half the users
of Apple, Inc. That would be about the closest to Apple, it would ever get.
But over the course of the next several months the market was
a wave of chic Android handsets [
] with bleeding edge hardware. Overnight Palm went from legitimate contender to forgotten footnote.
One major factor in Palm being left behind was that it just wasn't keeping up with Android in hardware and wasn't release enough handsets. Palm didn't have the luxury that Apple did of selling phones with outdated hardware solely on brand image.
November 2009 release
of the Pixi, Palm only was able to muster a
minor memory bump
in January 2010 for its Verizon versions of its smart phone duo. At the time these units lagged behind the top-of-the-line Androids, particularly in screen resolution.
As the months passed by in early 2010, Palm's sales plunged. In addition to dated hardware and limited selection, Palm increasingly found itself experiencing another problem -- overproduction. It was classic supply and demand -- Palm was supplying, but the market wasn't demanding. The consequence of Palm's unrealistic sales hopes was
a downward plunge in prices
that hastened Palm's sales plunge, as interested customers opted to wait for next month... and then next month... in hopes of lower prices.
By April 2010 the situation had gotten so bad that Palm was
looking to sell itself
to the highest bidder. It
smart phones as it had accumulated abundant surpluses. And those smart phones it was selling at fire sale prices --
as low as a penny
. And the company had nary a new product.
Despite Palm's increasingly self-defeating performance, the company did perk some interest from prospective buyers. HTC Corp. (
considered a purchase
, but ultimately (and perhaps wisely) decided to stay away. Hong Kong-based Lenovo Group, Ltd. (
) similar contemplated a deal, but then bailed.
And then what Palm hoped was its night in shining armor appeared -- HP.
III. Why HP Failed at Palm
HP desperately was looking to come up with an entrant in the burgeoning smart phone and tablet markets, and Palm seemed the perfect vehicle for those aspirations.
But ultimately HP's plan fizzled for a simple reason -- it let Palm be Palm.
Much like Palm did on its own, Palm at HP committed the familiar sins. It overproduced. It under-delivered in hardware. And it delivered new releases at a familiar lackadaisical churn.
After the April acquisitions, HP would not release a new webOS handset until November, when it finally pulled the wraps off
the Pre 2
. And to make matters worse, the Pre 2 lagged badly behind its Android counterparts with a measly 320x480 screen -- unacceptable dated hardware for a flagship phone at the time (unless you happened to be the iPhone). That would be bad enough, were it not for the fact that the Pre 2 was also Palm's first major hardware revision in a year.
In February things were already starting to look bad again for HP's acquisition. It had no sales presence and the Pre 2 was largely a market flop. But if there's one thing that Palm's mastered in recent years it was entertaining high hopes. So when it unveiled
the Veer, the Pre
, and the TouchPad tablet in February
, many --
staffers included -- were hopeful that things might finally be turning around.
Shakespeare recognized that to craft the perfect tragedy you always had to build high hopes and optimism before the final fall. Thus it was with webOS.
The Veer would
eventually launch in May
of this year, and
the TouchPad in July
, but the final act was already beginning.
of the HP TouchPad poured in. Many, like
's writeup, praised the overall operating system, but said that it was a series of flaws that prevented the device from shining.
The TouchPad entered into a
cycle of price cuts
and plunging sales, as "fickle" customers opted to wait to get that lowest price the next month. Even
an OS update from HP
, which polished off many of the device's rough edges, wasn't enough to change the public's mind.
Still, it wasn't just the Palm units old bad habits -- overproduction, lacking hardware, and too few releases -- which doomed HP's webOS project. It was also lack of patience of HP.
HP could have tested the waters with its new, more polished webOS 3.0 interface, cutting production to more cautious levels, pushing for more devices (a device every two months would have seemed a minimum), and better hardware in the flagship models (more RAM, higher resolution LCD screens, etc.).
Instead HP chose to ax the webOS experiment altogether.
We'll never know if webOS could have turned the corner under more disciplined leadership.
But if there's one take home message from this announcement, it's that HP since day one was rather clueless on how to manage a mobile device unit and remains just as clueless as ever. While it may eventually muster competitive tablets, it appears increasingly unlikely HP will ever succeed in the near term in the smart phone market. That's very bad news financially for HP.
As for webOS, HP promises, "HP will continue to explore options to optimize the value of webOS software going forward."
But don't get your hopes up. HP has buried its webOS smart phones and tablets. About the most a webOS fan has to hope for is
that long-promised webOS printer
. But even if HP isn't
killing webOS at present, the operating system is now a dead man walking. After all, there's little reason to maintain a full-fledged smart phone and tablet operating system for printers only.
webOS -- the webOS tech enthusiasts knew, at least -- leaves behind a legacy of five phones and one tablet in the U.S. (the Pre, Pixi, Pre Plus, Pix Plus, Pre 2, and TouchPad). The Pre
? It never made it to market in the U.S. For Palm and webOS fans, that may be the bitterest pill to swallow amid all this gloom.
This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled
RE: Sad but not surprised
8/19/2011 5:38:09 AM
I think you guys are missing the big picture, why would HP who has suffered many struggles in the past few years want to risk capital trying to fight a 3 headed Hydra in the WebOS/smartphone market? In today's business climate you no longer buy a name, or a product, you buy the IP! HP didn't want to resurrect a dying OS, they just wanted to kill it off without incurring too many losses. by following this path they have made as much money as possible on existing Palm projects and taken enough time to jump-start new Palm infused HP products.
"My sex life is pretty good" -- Steve Jobs' random musings during the 2010 D8 conference
GPU Roaring? You May Be Infected With a Bitcoin Trojan Says Symantec
August 17, 2011, 4:47 PM
Quick Note: HP TouchPad Already Selling for Up to $150 Off MSRP
August 4, 2011, 8:10 AM
Android Outsells iPhone 5-to-2, Has Nearly 50 Percent of the Market
August 2, 2011, 11:46 AM
HP’s Rubinstein Compares TouchPad Reviews to OS X's Initial Release
July 6, 2011, 7:48 AM
WebOS Finally Gets in Tablet Game With TouchPad on July 19
June 9, 2011, 10:14 AM
IDC: Although Apple Remains at Top of Tablet Market, Share Falls from 33% to 26.9%
July 24, 2014, 1:24 PM
Thanks in Part to Strong G3 Launch, LG Sells 14.5 Million Smartphones in Q2
July 24, 2014, 10:18 AM
4.7" Samsung Galaxy Alpha Smartphone Coming Next Month
July 24, 2014, 8:28 AM
Report: Apple to Launch 12" Retina MacBook Air, 4K Desktop Product Later this Year
July 24, 2014, 4:33 AM
Apple iPhone Sales Rise Nearly 50 Percent in China for Fiscal Q3 2014
July 24, 2014, 2:04 AM
Microsoft Rolls Out Budget Lumia 530 to Replace Hugely Successful Lumia 520
July 23, 2014, 7:47 AM
Most Popular Articles
Microsoft Kills Entertainment Unit, May Shelve Flagship Lumia "McLaren"
July 18, 2014, 7:40 PM
JJ Abrams Unveils X-Wing Starfighter for New "Star Wars" Movie
July 21, 2014, 12:24 PM
Boeing 777 Malaysian Airlines Flight 17 Crashes in Ukraine
July 17, 2014, 1:00 PM
Ford Details ’15 F-150’s 325hp, 2.7L EcoBoost V6; Demonstrates 732-lb Weight Loss
July 22, 2014, 6:55 PM
Toyota Scientist: Autonomous Vehicles May Lead to Increased Fuel Consumption, Pollution
July 18, 2014, 2:42 PM
Latest Blog Posts
Space Terrorism is a Looming Threat For the United States
Apr 23, 2014, 7:47 PM
Facebook Aims to Provide Internet to "Every Person in the World" with Drones, Satellites
Apr 1, 2014, 10:20 AM
Retail Mobile Sites Experience Outages in Light of Simplexity's Bankruptcy
Mar 14, 2014, 8:48 AM
Tesla vs. BMW: Who Has the Safer EV?
Feb 1, 2014, 2:56 PM
Justice Leaks Details of Next HTC One Two Flagship Phone
Dec 5, 2013, 4:04 PM
More Blog Posts
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. -
Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information