The .xxx domain is the new kid on Web block, and
while it was specifically created for pornographic sites, its presence has
caused nothing but headaches for both the porn industry and non-pornographic
domain was first proposed in 2000 by ICM Registry, a private
company founded by Stuart Lawley, as a voluntary option for pornographic sites
on the internet. It faced strong criticism from many politicians and
conservative groups, but was resubmitted in 2004. The Internet Corporation for
Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Board finally approved the sTLD on March 18,
2011, and it went into operation on April 15, 2011.
The new domain will not launch until December of
this year, but many companies are paying the $200 to $300 fee to preregister
their domain names now whether they want to or not because they fear
cybersquatters will register trademarks before them.
Cybersquatters register domain names of large
businesses like Coca-Cola and Apple,
for instance, before the actual companies have a chance to buy them. There are
also typosquatters, who register well-known brand domain names as well, but
with slight typographic errors like "Peppsi" instead of
"Pepsi." To prevent brand theft and regain control of these corporate
Web addresses, these large businesses are at the mercy of the cybersquatter who
beat them to the punch, and the result could be a hefty ransom and legal
ICM Registry said it has received 900,000 requests
from companies to preregister
their trademarks. So far, 80 percent of preregistered companies are
non-pornographic businesses. These companies do not necessarily want to do
this, since many corporations already own several domain names. According to
Frederick Felman, chief marketing officer of MarkMonitor, a company that helps
others protect their brands, most large companies "own tens of thousands
of domain names."
Companies may not like it, but many are jumping on
the chance to preregister now to save the trouble later. MTV Networks, VH1,
Comedy Central and Budget Travel are among those who have preregistered at
least one .xxx domain name.
Other companies are not only jumping on-board to
preregister, but are also going along with the pornographic correlation of the
.xxx domain. For instance, People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA)
has preregistered peta.xxx, and plans to make it a pornography site that also
promotes the importance of animal safety and respect.
The porn industry, which the .xxx domain was
designed for, is not happy with the upcoming launch either. While these
companies also have to deal with cybersquatters and typosquatters, the industry
also fears censorship associated with the new
Many adult entertainment companies are refusing to
pay the fee or register the domains, but are demanding protection. Manwin, one
of the world's largest online porn companies based in Canada, had its lawyers
send Lawley a letter in June warning his company to protect all 57 of Manwin's
preexisting domain names under the .xxx domain or "risk the
Hustler, a U.S.-based adult entertainment company
with dozens of domain names, has sent Lawley a similar letter. These companies
have claimed that the registration of their domain names without their consent
will be a violation of their rights.
ICM Registry responded to these companies by
saying that a registry cannot be sued for trademark infringement. Lawley also
noted that he is not launching the new domain to blackmail corporations with brand
protection or for monetary reasons.
"We're doing it on a cost-recovery basis,"
said Lawley, who said the fees would only cover the cost of the applicant's
trademark ownership verification. "We don't make a dime out of it."
Some companies will receive the exemption that the
porn industry desires. For instance, the Red Cross and the International
Olympic Committee will have protected domains without having to pay the fees
because they have international status.
ICANN will begin allowing companies to apply for
their own domains starting next year, such as .Coca-Cola or .Nike, which is
likely to result in another registry explosion and an increase in the cost of
"Multiply .xxx times several hundred, and
that's the scale of the problem," said Felman.
quote: Further, what's to stop malicious website devs from using re-directs from a seemingly innocent domain name, so long as <companyname>.xxx is registered?