Print 33 comment(s) - last by Tony Swash.. on Aug 12 at 3:40 AM

Google stands accused of using its Android smart phone market giant to crush the competition.  (Source: AP Photo)
Is Google abusing its dominant position to proselytize its services?

The world's most popular smartphone operating system, Google Inc.'s (GOOG) Android OS, can't seem to catch a break these days.  If its not being attacked in court [1][2][3][4][5by rival smartphone maker Apple, Inc. (AAPL) whose looking to forcibly remove its products from market [1][2] with lawsuits, it's being probed by antitrust investigators.

The U.S. Federal Trade Commission on Wednesday issued long awaited subpoenas.  For those of you who aren't lawyers and haven't been dragged through a major court case, a "subpoena" is a government demand for testimony or evidence.  Failure to give the requested information can result in criminal and/or civil penalties.

The fact that the U.S. government has issued subpoenas shows that it's getting serious about its investigation of Google.  A Google spokeswoman seemed nonchalant, commenting, "We understand that with success comes scrutiny. We're happy to answer any questions they have about our business."

But for all the cheer, the move is a major concern for Google.

Several small smartphone service providers have claimed that Google applied pressure to its hardware partners to boot their products off their smartphones, in favor of Google's rival services.  In and of itself, that might not be illegal were, Google not by far the industry's most dominant player in sales.  Android is reportedly outselling the next closest company, Apple, 5-to-2 in recent figures.  Thus if Google is found guilty of the allegations, it could face stiff penalties for violating antitrust laws.

Other allegations against Google include reports that it stole data from other services, such as reviews site Yelp and used it to bolster its own offerings.  And Google also stands of artificially boosting its services above competitors' in the results from its search engine -- the most used search engine on the planet.

The issue of the subpoenas was first reported by The Wall Street Journal.  Even if Google can beat the antitrust rap in the U.S. it faces similar accusations in Europe, a place known for its strict antitrust laws [1][2].  

Google has set aside $500M USD in cash to cover possible antitrust penalties.  The question is whether that will be close to enough.

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Where is Google going?
By Tony Swash on 8/11/2011 9:57:52 AM , Rating: -1
Google often seems to me to be a company bereft of strategic common sense. If you manage a big corporation, especially one like Google which is dependent on essentially one source of income, it would seem common sense to try to carefully diversify one's revenue generating products and services, try to avoid unnecessary fights with too many competitors at once and to try to build some useful long term alliances. Google seem to do the opposite of this. What's so startling about Google's overall pattern of initiatives, projects and product launches is how so many seem to be designed to pick big fights with leading tech companies, designed to actually attack the business model of many tech companies, whilst making absolutely no money for Google. This seems to me senseless and reckless. Why do this sort of stuff?

To take one big example, it has always puzzled me as to why Google decided to do Android and why they chose to do it like they did. Obviously the rise of the post-PC mobile internet device world could pose some threats to Google's sole money earner which is selling search related advertising, and it does seem that in the new mobile device world search related advertising doesn't do too well. This is compounded by the rise of the app paradigm, and the threat that once the majority of people are accessing internet services via apps instead of browsers Google could be shut out. Google was right to try to plan for these changes. It's just that I can't see how Android has addressed these changes and threats, or even how Android has been strategically good for Google in any way.

It's true Google has built a sort of relationship with several hand set and device OEMs but it's not a close or strategic relationship, and if Android ends up costing more than WP7 all those fair weather friends will vanish very quickly.

I think they drifted into the ridiculous Android adventure partly through hubris and partly through poor corporate governance and poor leadership. Google will end up paying a very high price for Android. It's a shame really - they seemed so interesting for a while, perhaps a force for good and then they let themselves fall into being a sort of poor mans Microsoft V2 only without the gravity or clout. If you set out to seriously attack the business of most of the major large tech companies with products you don't actually make any money on you end up making some very powerful enemies for no good reason. Madness.

Prior to Android (or more accurately prior to the decision to reset the Android design so as to clone iPhone instead of Blackberry) Google had a very solid seeming alliance with Apple, Eric Schmidt was invited onto the Apple board and Google services were built deep into iOS from the its launch.

Maybe Google feared Apple would shut them out, maybe they thought Microsoft might beat iPhone and shut Google out. Maybe they just didn't think very clearly at all. But the up shot was that the embrace of Android, the cloning of iOS, the deliberate and provocative anti-Apple rhetoric at Google's IO in 2010 all meant that Apple went very quickly from being an ally to being an enemy.

Now I am not trying to turn this into a comment about Apple and Google but rather to use the deliberate breaking of the Alliance with Apple as an example of how profoundly Android effected and changed Googles strategic direction. And for why? Google don't make money from Android, Google is still faced with the same conundrum of how to adapt its business model to the new mobile paradigm, Android users are no more likely to use Google search than are iOS users.

So frankly I am at loss when I try to understand where Google thinks it is going. Maybe 'it' doesn't think at all, maybe there is no 'it', maybe there are really many Google's, lots of decision making centres, all building their favourite hobby horse projects with no thought as to the broader strategic implications. I sometimes get sense that Google often get's pulled down roads which lead to places they probably wouldn't have wanted to go to in the first place. Places where they find themselves doing evil for noble ideals. Maybe Google is just like a socially awkward autistic savant, both brilliant and utterly inept at the same time. It's certainly interesting to watch.

RE: Where is Google going?
By sprockkets on 8/11/2011 10:18:11 AM , Rating: 2
So, in summary, FUD

RE: Where is Google going?
By Tony Swash on 8/11/11, Rating: -1
RE: Where is Google going?
By 2ManyOptions on 8/11/2011 11:19:50 AM , Rating: 2
Google everywhere. Possibly that's their goal.
You are missing Microsoft here, apart from Apple, this will be a direct assault on Windows phone OS and so far they are successful and way ahead of them - this would also gives them ability to integrate Google search wherever needed in the mobile space, something Microsoft could do with Bing thus taking/defending that piece of market share.

RE: Where is Google going?
By Xcpus on 8/11/2011 8:07:41 PM , Rating: 2
No offense Tony but nearly all your posts lack logic. I mean what else would one expect from a fanboi. There is no logic when one holds an irrational attachment to one particular Corporate image.

You spin anything in Apple's favor just like a Bill O'Reilly segment.

I care not for Google, Apple, Microsoft etc. I just care about competition leading to better prices for consumers. I care about the average citizen getting a better deal through stiff but rational/reasonable degrees of competition.

I think that IP needs to be re-written and a balance found. I think that if a company does not physically bring an idea to life then its patent ought to be ignored. And even if a company brings an idea to life that idea must be truly creative and original and we can find methods to quantify this based on "precedence". Is it a revolutionary product or a logical evolutionary extension of other existing ideas?

Anyway... your posts are rarely informative and rarely offer any sort of insight. I just hope you know that to anyone NOT an Apple fanboi you sound irrational. Whether it is a Google/Microsoft Fan or a Neutral person such as myself.

Maybe seek counseling or something.

RE: Where is Google going?
By Tony Swash on 8/12/2011 3:40:46 AM , Rating: 2
My post isn't about Apple it's about Google, about which I guess you have nothing to say.

RE: Where is Google going?
By kraeper on 8/11/2011 11:57:02 AM , Rating: 1
In summary, TLDR, and QQ moar.

RE: Where is Google going?
By FeralMisanthrope on 8/11/2011 11:46:51 AM , Rating: 2
Google is attempting to capitalize on the inevitable commoditization and democratization of mobile computing. Before Android, smartphones were a lot like the IBM mainframes of old--proprietary hardware/software combinations that allow companies like Apple and RIM to drive high margins through vertical integration and customer lock-in. In a way, Google is trying to do for mobile devices what Microsoft did for the PC. Unlike Microsoft, Google monetizes its consumer products and services indirectly. I think it's still too early to tell if Android will be strategically good for Google. Aside from crowding out some noteworthy competitors like MeeGo and WebOS, Android has been huge win for consumers, developers, device manufacturers, service providers, and mobile computing in general. I doubt that I would even own a smartphone if not for Android, and I'm not the only one.

P.S. I really like your comparison of Google to an autistic savant! Of all the psychological maladies that can be used to describe a corporation, Asperger syndrome is certainly not the worst.

RE: Where is Google going?
By vision33r on 8/11/2011 12:39:20 PM , Rating: 2
Android is a large win for Asia as they were severely behind in the software engineering area. Android gave them a free mobile OS to use to go head to head against RIM, Apple, and Microsoft.

It's only a huge win for the US Carriers selling data plans. Very few American or European businesses are capitalizing on Android as much as Asia.

RE: Where is Google going?
By Tony Swash on 8/11/2011 1:54:39 PM , Rating: 1
I see some interesting responses to my comment but none address my key question. The question was not is Android a good thing, is it good for handset makers, is it good for consumers. The question is: is Android good for Google? And if it is - how?

As far as I can see even if every smart phone on the planet was Android, iPhone and WP7 crushed, it still wouldn't generate extra revenue for Google. It wouldn't solve Google's strategic problems with the post PC world. Google actually makes more per capita per iOS user than per Android user but both rates of revenue are much lower than per desktop user. So if in five years the web is the mobile device web and not the desktop web then Android will do nothing about solving the revenue resulting problems that that will cause Google.

RE: Where is Google going?
By AmbroseAthan on 8/11/2011 4:18:06 PM , Rating: 2
This was some good commentary on Android's purpose and business sense:

And here is some of the money analysis:

RE: Where is Google going?
By sprockkets on 8/11/2011 7:55:51 PM , Rating: 2
Dude, you aren't asking a question - you are posting a bunch of rhetorical nonsense meant to be posed as a question but with the effect of FUD. I see through it, and so do others.

You aren't genuinely asking for an answer, but if you were, the one you need is


RE: Where is Google going?
By acer905 on 8/11/2011 12:41:52 PM , Rating: 1
There is one point that I must contest. Yes, the design of Android was changed after the the success of iOS, however it was not to directly clone it. Instead, the design change was to take advantage of the shift in user interface metrics. The iPhone showed that people would accept a device with nothing but a screen to interact with. Prior to that, touch screen devices were gimmicks.

The interface on stock android has always been different from iOS. Samsung chose to use TouchWiz, which was heavily modeled on iOS instead of stock, much like HTC uses Sense. However, neither are Google's fault. The interface on the Nexus S, much like that of the Nexus One before it, and going back to the old HTC Dream, are all significantly different than iOS. The only change from the original design was a switch to full front touch screen.

"Game reviewers fought each other to write the most glowing coverage possible for the powerhouse Sony, MS systems. Reviewers flipped coins to see who would review the Nintendo Wii. The losers got stuck with the job." -- Andy Marken

Latest Headlines
Inspiron Laptops & 2-in-1 PCs
September 25, 2016, 9:00 AM
The Samsung Galaxy S7
September 14, 2016, 6:00 AM
Apple Watch 2 – Coming September 7th
September 3, 2016, 6:30 AM
Apple says “See you on the 7th.”
September 1, 2016, 6:30 AM

Most Popular ArticlesSmartphone Screen Protectors – What To Look For
September 21, 2016, 9:33 AM
UN Meeting to Tackle Antimicrobial Resistance
September 21, 2016, 9:52 AM
Walmart may get "Robot Shopping Carts?"
September 17, 2016, 6:01 AM
5 Cases for iPhone 7 and 7 iPhone Plus
September 18, 2016, 10:08 AM
Update: Problem-Free Galaxy Note7s CPSC Approved
September 22, 2016, 5:30 AM

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki