In April of this year, Apple launched a lawsuit
against mobile competitor Samsung, saying that the South Korean electronics
the interface elements and exterior design of iOS gadgets to make their own. Then, in
June 2011, Apple sued Samsung a second time for allegedly copying
the design of the iPhone 3G to make the Samsung Galaxy S.
As if that wasn't enough, Apple successfully
caused a ban on Samsung's Australian tablet sales
after suing the company for allegedly copying the design of the iPad 2 for the
Galaxy Tab 10.1.
Now, Apple has pulled the same maneuver with
tablet sales. The Regional Court of Dusseldorf has granted Apple a
preliminary injunction against the sale of the Samsung Galaxy Tab 10.1
throughout Europe with the exception of the Netherlands. The judge agreed that
the Galaxy Tab 10.1 infringed on Apple's intellectual property, copying certain
characteristics of the iPad 2.
According to intellectual property analyst Florian
Muller, Apple has a separate lawsuit occurring in the Netherlands.
"The exception of the Netherlands is due to
the aforementioned separate legal proceeding in that country," said
Muller. "That exception relates only to Samsung's Korean parent company,
not to the German subsidiary."
Samsung just launched the new Galaxy Tab 10.1
device in Britain last week, but all product must now be taken off the shelves.
Some retailers noted that the Galaxy Tab 10.1 was the fastest-selling tablet
since the iPad 2 launched earlier this year.
"It's no coincidence that Samsung's latest
products look a lot like the iPhone and iPad, from the shape of the hardware to
the user interface and even the packaging," said an Apple spokesman.
"This kind of blatant copying is wrong, and we need to protect Apple's
intellectual property when companies steal our ideas."
Samsung could appeal against the judgment, but the
injunction will remain in place regardless in the meantime. Also, an appeal
would be heard by the same judge, and would take about a month to be heard.
While Samsung decided to countersue
Apple back in April for the previous lawsuit, it is unclear if
it will appeal the current judgment.
Apple was named most
valuable company in the U.S. today for briefly surpassing Exxon in market value, but Android
is dominating the mobile market and it seems like Apple's answer to competition is to
eliminate it entirely.
quote: Apple was named most valuable company in the U.S. today for briefly surpassing Exxon in market value, but Android is dominating the mobile market and it seems like Apple's answer to competition is to eliminate it entirely.
quote: In fact, while Android device numbers are growing, Apple's profit share has been steadily increasing. As long as this remains the case, Apple hardly has to fear the competition.
quote: So this isn't about money...
quote: If it isn't about money, then why waste money fighting this fight? They are a business, after all. They must see a monetary advantage in filing these lawsuits, right?
quote: I think they believe they make great products and that there are certain, unique, innovative features that make their products great and those should be protected