backtop


Print 54 comment(s) - last by overlandpark4m.. on Aug 11 at 10:15 PM


A tiny Florida company claims Apple is violating its ownership of booting an operating system quickly.  (Source: Cult of Mac)

A flow chart from the patent in question shows a seemingly intuitive process to optimize booting Unix-like or Windows operating system.  (Source: U.S. Patent and Trademark Office)
Lawsuit seems equal measures a sad observation on the U.S. patent system and irony

Apple, Inc. (AAPL) is no stranger to the U.S. patent system.  After all, it's one of the biggest intellectual property holders in the U.S.  Faced with surging sales of Android-based smartphones, it's now resorted to suing the world's top three Android manufacturers [1][2][3][4][5] in a bid to forcibly remove them from the market.

However, Apple is receiving an awfully ironic taste of its own medicine.  A shadowy Floridian company entitled "Operating System Solutions LLC" (OSS LLC) has filed suit against Apple, alleging its OS X Mac computer operating system violates a patent which quite literally covers booting up fast.

According to the plaintiffs, Apple willfully infringed on the intellectual property holders' exclusive right to "boot up" quickly.

The patent, U.S. Patent 6,434,696 -- entitled "Method for quickly booting a computer system" -- describes:

A method for quickly booting a personal computer system using boot configuration information on memory and the attached devices that was created and saved in a hard disk at the preceding boot process. The method for a quick boot process includes the steps of performing a power-on self test POST) operation when a personal computer system is powered on or a reset button is pressed; performing a normal boot process after the POST operation; saving the contents of memory and the status of the attached devices to a hard disk; checking if a reboot is requested; restoring the saved boot configuration information from the hard disk, after POST is completed during the reboot process; checking whether or not an initial device configuration file and/or an automatic batch file were changed; and executing commands in the two files and saving a newly created boot configuration information to the hard disk for future boot. The personal computer system, may reboot quickly because of omission of execution of the initial device configuration filed and the automatic batch file.

OSS LLC writes [Scribd]:

9. Upon information and belief, without license or permission from OSS, Apple has infringed, actively induced others to infringe, and/or contributorily infringed, literally or under the doctrine of equivalents,one or more claims of the OSS Patent. Apple did so by importing, making, using, offering to sell, and/or selling products and devices that embody and./or practice the patented invention.
...
17. Upon information and belief Apple's actions were and have been willful and in direct disregard of Plaintiff's patent rights.

A quick search of the U.S. Patent database found no patents issued to OSS LLC.  It did show that the patent in question was originally assigned to LG Electronics, Inc. (SEO:066570) in 2002, after a completed filing in 1999.  The patent was transferred first to Microconnect LLC in 2004, then to ANPA Inc., and then finally to Protimus Technologies LLC, being reissued to Protimus in 2008.  It is unknown when the ownership changed hands to OSS LLC.

Of this plethora of companies, none had an apparent website, except for perhaps Microconnect LLC, which may be affiliated with a British IT services provider of the same name.

Some, such as Business Insider are suggesting LG may be somehow behind the attack.  Writes Florian Mueller (also of FOSS Patents):

There are two distinct possibilities. It's conceivable that LG determined that this patent was not central to its business and divested it. Big companies make divestments of this kind all the time. But with the smartphone patent wars going on, companies usually look to buy -- not sell -- patents. The other -- potentially more meaningful -- alternative is that this previously-unheard-of Florida-based plaintiff could be a proxy steered by LG. In that case, this would be either a warning shot or the beginning of a wider conflict between Apple and LG, which the latter may deem inevitable.

However, the multiple patent holders makes this less likely.  Companies like LG are typically less shy about their patent holdings and are less likely to use shell companies to do their litigious bidding.  More likely the patent belongs to a "patent troll" like Intellectual Property Ventures or NTP, Inc.

It's possible that the true parent company may never be known.  These kinds of disputes are often settled out of court, as it's less expensive to settle than to challenge the patent in a protracted court dispute.

The case does raise broader questions -- for example, why does a company that does not produce computer operating systems get to hold a sweeping patent on any operating system that follows an intuitive scheme to boot faster?  

For Apple, though, that spells irony, as the company has been the recipient of many questionably generic patent awards, such as the patent on multitouch. But in Apple's defense, at least it actually builds the things it patents, even if the patents themselves may be questionable.

The new case was filed last Friday in Florida Middle District Court and is presided by Judge James S. Moody, Jr.


Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

yeah
By Argon18 on 8/8/2011 2:47:02 PM , Rating: 5
aaaaanndd this is why our patent system is completely broken.




RE: yeah
By cjohnson2136 on 8/8/2011 2:52:57 PM , Rating: 5
agreed but it is funny to see Apple get a test of its own medicine


RE: yeah
By Argon18 on 8/8/2011 2:56:35 PM , Rating: 5
agreed. although in the end, the only real winners are the lawyers, and the only real losers are the consumers. :(


RE: yeah
By LBID on 8/8/2011 3:34:20 PM , Rating: 5
Haven't you noticed? The lawyers always win. No matter what.


RE: yeah
By fic2 on 8/8/2011 5:31:08 PM , Rating: 5
That is what happens when the players (lawyers) get to write the rule book (lawyers/congress).


RE: yeah
By Misty Dingos on 8/9/2011 8:47:06 AM , Rating: 5
The first thing we do, let's kill all the lawyers.
"Henry VI" W. Shakespeare

Disclaimer: This statement in not meant to be a threat to any individual or to any group. Nor is it intended to foment violent acts by others. The writer of this post is not to be held liable for the acts of others that may read this post. This is sarcasm and thus protected speech under the First Amendment to the US Constitution.


RE: yeah
By Dr of crap on 8/9/2011 8:49:35 AM , Rating: 5
+10!


RE: yeah
By TSS on 8/9/2011 4:13:12 PM , Rating: 5
I'm sorry but you violated my patent on "witty or humerous replies included but not limited to cyberspace via means of anekdotal communication".

My lawyers inform me you owe me 10 bucks.


RE: yeah
By OCNewbie on 8/9/2011 4:53:06 PM , Rating: 4
Well... someone had to derail the +5 train. Nice of you to set up.


RE: yeah
By OCNewbie on 8/9/2011 4:54:00 PM , Rating: 4
-set +step


RE: yeah
By BZDTemp on 8/8/2011 7:09:48 PM , Rating: 2
I want them to get so much medicine they drown.

Apple has turned out to every bit as evil as Microsoft and for the sake of the greater good they need to go down.


RE: yeah
By MechanicalTechie on 8/8/2011 8:00:30 PM , Rating: 3
I totally agree.. i refuse to buy an Apple products and persuade all that i know to do the same... and you know what... once they find out how Apple kills innovation and their business practises they agree too


RE: yeah
By gorehound on 8/9/2011 9:37:11 AM , Rating: 2
i agree.i am not going near anything Apple.They are the evil 1984 thing now like their old posters.


RE: yeah
By inperfectdarkness on 8/9/2011 6:25:14 AM , Rating: 2
if anyone should sue apple, purely on principle, it's LG. Prada > Iphone. there, i said it.


RE: yeah
By Sazabi19 on 8/8/2011 2:56:56 PM , Rating: 3
Everyone get ready for era of the Great Patent/IP Wars of 201x


RE: yeah
By xaders on 8/8/2011 3:09:12 PM , Rating: 2
agree, "what a joke!" on this stupid "software" patent suit. the software patent system is broken.


RE: yeah
By millerm277 on 8/8/2011 3:20:53 PM , Rating: 4
The worse it gets, the more likely something will have to be done. At the moment, nearly every player in the mobile industry has multiple lawsuits against other companies going, while defending itself against multiple lawsuits.

Personally, I just say that we should throw out software patents entirely.


RE: yeah
By cjohnson2136 on 8/8/2011 3:25:09 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
Personally, I just say that we should throw out software patents entirely.


here here


RE: yeah
By oldscotch on 8/9/2011 8:02:12 AM , Rating: 2
And oddly enough, the USPTO said the same thing. A couple of key Supreme Court rulings created the mess that we have now and it's up to them to undo what they did.


RE: yeah
By Stuka on 8/8/2011 3:08:10 PM , Rating: 2
Yup. They might as well have Anthony Sullivan sell patent stamps for them.

http://img.chan4chan.com/img/2010-07-15/patentoffi...


RE: yeah
By AmbroseAthan on 8/8/2011 3:36:45 PM , Rating: 5
Adjusted slightly...
quote:
"The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy defines IP/Patent Trolls & Lawyers as "a bunch of mindless jerks who'll be the first against the wall when the revolution comes," with a footnote to the effect that the editors would welcome applications from anyone interested in taking over the post of patent officer.

Curiously enough, an edition of the Encyclopaedia Galactica that had the good fortune to fall through a time warp from a thousand years in the future defined the IP/Patent Trolls & Lawyers as "a bunch of mindless jerks who were the first against the wall when the revolution came."
~Douglas Adams (kinda)


RE: yeah
By RivuxGamma on 8/8/2011 5:22:32 PM , Rating: 3
I'm gonna patent this totally new process, OK? It involves a beginning, which is where something starts, and an ending, which is where something ends. The process may be modified so that there is no ending and thus keeps going forever. It may also be modified so that there is no beginning or ending indicating the discovery of something that has no discernable beginning or end.

Anything found to be violating this patent will be forced to undergo Navy SEAL training every day for the rest of their lives and also have to give me all their money and assets.


RE: yeah
By wifiwolf on 8/8/2011 6:49:19 PM , Rating: 3
True but it seems much more specific than Apple's usual patents. It even describes technologies behind it. Seems a valid one although we've been seeing it for a long time.


RE: yeah
By Phoque on 8/8/2011 6:53:17 PM , Rating: 3
US Patent office ought to have becomed one of the most pathetic man made creation ever. God I laughed when I read that news. Absolutely incredible. Bounds and leaps beyond anything I have seen from Apple.

In the country of the American dream. LOL!


"If you look at the last five years, if you look at what major innovations have occurred in computing technology, every single one of them came from AMD. Not a single innovation came from Intel." -- AMD CEO Hector Ruiz in 2007














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki