backtop


Print 49 comment(s) - last by mindless1.. on Aug 12 at 3:03 PM


News Corp.'s aerial drone squadron reportedly includes an AR.Drone by Parrot (top) and a MD4-1000 by MicroDrone (bottom)  (Source: Wantist (top); MicroDrone (bottom))

Some fear that News Corp., who owns many international tabloids such as The New York Post, will begin using the drones to spy on celebrities and politicans.  (Source: The New York Post)
Owner of the WSJ, New York Post, and Fox News has a growing squadron of fliers -- are they legal?

Amid an ongoing British hacking scandal that's sunk its stock and forced it to shutter a top publication, News Corp. (NWS) is the subject of new questions -- this time here in the U.S.  

News Corp.'s empire, built by mogul Rupert Murdoch, has deep U.S. holdings.  It owns The New York Post, a tabloid that ranks seventh in U.S. newspaper circulation rankings; The Wall Street Journal, which ranks number one in circulation; and the Fox News network, which some claim is the most-watched cable news network in the U.S.

I. News Corp.'s Growing Drone Squadron

According to multiple reports News Corp. has been using drone aircraft to snoop on regions of interest from the air and snap photos.  One publication points to it using the MicroDrone MD4-1000, a commercial drone from a German tech startup that primarily markets to government agencies like police and fire departments.  Another claims that it uses the Parrot AR.Drone quadricopter by France's Parrot SA (EPA: PARRO), a hobbyist model which bills itself as "the flying videogame."

News Corp. openly admits to using drones, with a special feature in its iPad tabloid The Daily dubbed "The Daily Drone".  It's been a bit cagey, though, about exactly what models its drone army consists of.

Currently drones are legal for use by hobbyists at up to 400 feet.  Businesses, under the U.S. Federal Aviation Administration's rules are subject to stricter usage criteria.  Civil and commercials uses are only allowed for "research and development" purposes, "not for compensation or hire."

Companies using drones must prove the drone's air-worthiness (this may be taken care of by the companies who sell the drones) and then petition for a certificate for experimental use.  Currently 18 such certificates have been issued, though the FAA does not reveal to who.  FAA spokesperson Les Dorr reveals, "Currently, 18 of those experimental certificates are active. An experimental certificate allows the holder to do tests, training and demos but not for-hire operations. Ops also must be conducted away from populated areas."

Time Warner, Inc.'s (TWX) cable news property CNN is reportedly among those who uses drones, as well.

It is unclear whether News Corp. or CNN properly petitioned for permits.  States Les Dorr, "We are examining The Daily’s use of a small unmanned aircraft to see if it was in accordance with FAA policies."

II. Safer Reporting or Privacy Menace?

The FAA has not clarified whether news drones hovering over disaster areas constitutes experimental use "away from populated" areas, but it seems about as close to the definition as one might expect from a news organization.  Using robots in disaster areas to take photos and video could help keep human reporters out of harm's way.

Indeed some states are looking to expand allowances for drones.  Oklahoma, in particular, has pending legislation which would create an 80 mile aerial corridor reserved for use by autonomous fliers, including law enforcement drones.  A recent study by the NextGen institute predicts that 15,000 drones may be flying over our nation's skies by 2015.

Roboticist Ryan Calo, director of the Stanford Center for Internet and Society, expressed fears that the drones could be used by tabloids like the New York Post to spy on celebrities in populated areas, though.  He says that the fliers could be paired with facial recognition technology to automatically track their celebrity target of interest.

Given News Corp.'s overseas invasions into privacy in the name of tabloid journalism, perhaps this fear is warranted.  A bit of a non-sequitur raised by Forbes -- drones can also be used to hack into cell phones.  Hopefully News Corp. doesn't find that factoid out.


Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Invaded?
By saganhill on 8/4/2011 2:33:37 PM , Rating: 5
If I see one of those in my neighborhood it's getting shot down. They'll never know what hit them.




RE: Invaded?
By CalWorthing on 8/4/2011 2:38:25 PM , Rating: 2
Second the need eliminate the annoyance.


RE: Invaded?
By Schrag4 on 8/4/2011 2:44:32 PM , Rating: 4
I'd hate to think of a stray bullet intended for one of these killing someone a couple of miles away (stranger things have happened). How about a high-powered laser?


RE: Invaded?
By EJ257 on 8/4/2011 2:58:51 PM , Rating: 3
Use a shotgun maybe? It'll be just like skeet shooting.


RE: Invaded?
By JasonMick (blog) on 8/4/2011 2:59:23 PM , Rating: 5
quote:
How about a high-powered laser?

Well with that approach you might take down a plane... or so the government says:
http://news.travel.aol.com/2011/03/18/two-people-a...

The simple solution is: use the gun, but don't miss. Hopefully you've been practicing on the range. No pressure. :)


RE: Invaded?
By zmatt on 8/5/2011 4:09:53 AM , Rating: 3
I would say paintball or pellet gun. Most places, at least around here those are ok to fire within city limits, so there wont be the fall out. I would imagine these drones aren't built that tough so they should be easy targets.


RE: Invaded?
By quiksilvr on 8/5/2011 1:00:41 PM , Rating: 3
Potato cannon.


RE: Invaded?
By Adonlude on 8/10/2011 4:35:03 PM , Rating: 1
All of these suggestions sound very illegal. Let someone else do it.


RE: Invaded?
By chenjf on 8/5/2011 8:08:32 PM , Rating: 2
Even if you are able to hit it (let it be pistol, shotgun, bean bag, paintball, etc) and knock it out. The drone may fall on some unsuspecting person or damage whatever it happens to crash on. The resulting damage may be your fault.


RE: Invaded?
By AstroGuardian on 8/9/2011 5:53:53 AM , Rating: 2
Pellet gun for up to 400 feet? I don't think so


RE: Invaded?
By UNHchabo on 8/4/2011 3:07:05 PM , Rating: 3
Maybe the beanbags used by law enforcement in shotguns, then?


RE: Invaded?
By runutz on 8/4/2011 4:42:54 PM , Rating: 2
Bolas would work very well

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bolas


RE: Invaded?
By schmandel on 8/4/2011 11:58:53 PM , Rating: 3
As a child I played with these, unintentionally causing an electrical outage in my neighborhood by tying power lines together with a wild launch that went vertical. I ran :-)

My experience is the 3 weight bola is easiest to learn to use. Some twine and fishing sinkers and you too can bring on the darkness.


RE: Invaded?
By GulWestfale on 8/4/2011 5:45:08 PM , Rating: 5
quote:
How about a high-powered laser?


only if it's mounted to the head of a shark.


RE: Invaded?
By Samus on 8/5/11, Rating: 0
RE: Invaded?
By karlostomy on 8/5/2011 11:38:52 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
A bullet shot into the air will inevitably fall at a harmless velocity...


No.
Falling bullets pack enough velocity to kill people at any angle of incidence.

http://www.abc.net.au/science/k2/homework/s95523.h...


RE: Invaded?
By delphinus100 on 8/4/2011 6:34:44 PM , Rating: 2
I see your point, but which one is the average Joe more likely to have...?

And be mindful that people get into trouble for pointing low power lasers at aircraft.


RE: Invaded?
By hughlle on 8/5/2011 12:48:53 PM , Rating: 2
Did mythbusters not cover this? :D


RE: Invaded?
By mindless1 on 8/12/2011 3:03:38 PM , Rating: 2
How about a frequency scanner and jammer? Your choice, crash it into something valuable leaving them/insurance with the bill, OR land it in a neutral location you can reach first then go pick up your new toy.

I'd LOVE to have one of these to play with.


RE: Invaded?
By theapparition on 8/4/2011 3:23:33 PM , Rating: 3
Except when the craft is recovered and the video evidence is revealed showing you smiling in your backyard, guns a blazin.

You'll be released in 1-3, though.


RE: Invaded?
By AntiM on 8/4/2011 4:31:18 PM , Rating: 5
Or...how about your own attack drone? A drone designed to destroy other drones, especially pink ones. This could spin off into a reality show.... Drone Wars.


RE: Invaded?
By SiliconJon on 8/4/2011 5:20:21 PM , Rating: 2
Just crack the thing and make it yours - then take it back to spy on its owner(s). Pipe its video feed directly into the broadcast I would recommend.

http://dronehacks.com/


RE: Invaded?
By DPigs on 8/4/2011 5:27:28 PM , Rating: 2
I would use this to maintain air superiority over my property. So awesome. I'm sure arming it wouldn't be too hard either.

http://www.bananahobby.com/2073.html


RE: Invaded?
By Strunf on 8/5/2011 7:27:44 AM , Rating: 2
I thought those planes were much more expensive, they do have airsoft battle tanks but no airsoft helicopters :(


RE: Invaded?
By Burnc4 on 8/5/2011 8:22:49 AM , Rating: 2
Chow's selling planes now?


RE: Invaded?
By schmandel on 8/4/2011 11:48:37 PM , Rating: 2
Pull!


RE: Invaded?
By priusone on 8/5/2011 1:02:48 AM , Rating: 2
While I whole heartedly agree with you, the only places big enough for newscorp to have drones also have laws preventing gun ownership, unless you're government or criminal.


RE: Invaded?
By mattclary on 8/8/2011 9:12:27 AM , Rating: 2
Unless they get it on camera and you wind up in jail for destruction of private property.


Buh buh ba naaaa!!!
By spread on 8/4/2011 2:20:21 PM , Rating: 2
I see the plot of a new James Bond movie.




RE: Buh buh ba naaaa!!!
By guffwd13 on 8/4/2011 2:53:19 PM , Rating: 2
um, wasn't this the plot of Die Another Day?


RE: Buh buh ba naaaa!!!
By Demon-Xanth on 8/4/2011 3:11:24 PM , Rating: 2
Between this and the whole voicemail hacking thing... I'm keeping an eye out for a sharp dressed man being chased by thugs so I know to hide to avoid being shot in a crowded market.


RE: Buh buh ba naaaa!!!
By spread on 8/4/2011 3:36:14 PM , Rating: 3
Yes but the villain was middle aged. In the gritty reboot they'll cast a geriatric to play Murdoch.


Man do I hate News Corp
By michael67 on 8/4/2011 3:35:08 PM , Rating: 2
If there is one company i wish a quick demise then it is News Corp.

Man do I hate that company and wish it it all the worse in the world




RE: Man do I hate News Corp
By NicodemusMM on 8/4/2011 10:48:50 PM , Rating: 2
Agreed... God forbid there be a company with a differing opinion.


RE: Man do I hate News Corp
By dark matter on 8/5/2011 4:20:31 PM , Rating: 2
Yeah, especially when they are hacking dead girls phones and deleting messages to get their story eh...


I wonder if they swarm?
By GruntboyX on 8/4/2011 2:41:28 PM , Rating: 5
I found the Crowbar to be remarkable effective at destroying them.




How will police find the person to ticket?
By mike8675309 on 8/4/2011 5:52:54 PM , Rating: 2
How is this type of video recording going to work when some states won't let you record people and police officers in public?
http://www.dailytech.com/Law+Enforcement+Tape+Us+G...




By rbuszka on 8/9/2011 1:50:53 PM , Rating: 2
That's easy. They just won't enforce the law on News Corp. That is, unless the story is about the police, police brutality, etc.; those laws are there to let the police arrest YOU (amateur photojournalists and random individuals with a smartphone) any time they please.

The Fraternal Order of Police is the organization that's doing the lobbying for a lot of these anti-police-accountability laws, which puts them on the long list of enemies of our free society which have infiltrated the gov't by talking with their money.


Govt. trolling for bribe money?
By Starcub on 8/4/2011 7:55:16 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
The FAA has not clarified whether news drones hovering over disaster areas constitutes experimental use "away from populated" areas, but it seems about as close to the definition as one might expect from a news organization.

Isn't it obvious? News corp is a for profit enterprise, so their drones should fall under commercial use classification and restriction.




I wonder
By KoS on 8/5/2011 3:28:35 PM , Rating: 2
wonder if the FAA is looking into other businesses who use UAVs for commerical efforts?

I bet not!




News Corp
By Dorkyman on 8/4/11, Rating: -1
RE: News Corp
By Belard on 8/4/2011 6:39:27 PM , Rating: 5
LOL.... uh, no.

You wouldn't know truth if it sat on you. FOX / Newscorps is a foreigner owned business by an angry old man and an arab. The owners and staff are NeoCons, many worked for the old NIXON and did illegal things.

The company does illegal things.

But you lie to your self, so you don't even see FOX's lies. Just because they say "fair and balance" doesn't mean it is. Gee, everyone on their shows is.... a republican. Everyone they attack is... a democrat. Only a fool would think otherwise.

Dailyshow showed a funny montage of FOX footage. Hannity says something stupid like "we on the right are peaceful, loving and understanding"... then we get about 1 minute of clips (about 20) of them calling names, nazi, demonizing, instulting... the very thing that they are SHOCKED when people call them such things.

You have OReilly who is so stupid, he doesn't understand the moon causes tides.

Come on... name their LEFT side.

Yeah, NeoCons hate liberals, because they get called out. Keep in mind, the USA was founded by LIBERALS such as George Washington, our first president. He's on our $1 bill, in case you don't know.

There is a difference in having a different view and opinion vs. making up BS, editing video and stories to fit their propaganda.

ie: ACORN. (A) the white boy didn't look like a 70s pimp when he did the real videos (B) the guy who said he'd help them bring in teenage girls was getting info, after the NeoCon left, he called the police and they were planning on catching them. So on and so on.

Stupid DEMs took the crap evidence and didn't defend them. FOX and retards ate it up. After the investigations and the full videos where viewed, the lies where shown. That's a FACT, sorry it hurts.

Murdoch's companies have been doing lots of illegal things, 11 people have been arrested. Theres a dead guy already. Murdoch has already been caught lying at the hearing. By all means, the attack on NewsCorp should not end until the Murdochs are in jail and the company destroyed for the years if fake news in at least 3 countries.

There have been some great republicans in the past. Now, its a bunch of teabagger morons who can barely count to 100, much less read a book.


RE: News Corp
By KCjoker on 8/4/11, Rating: -1
RE: News Corp
By Donkeyshins on 8/4/2011 7:48:53 PM , Rating: 3
quote:
You're points would carry more weight if you didn't have to resort to 6th grade name calling . The fact that you do proves you're the moron .


Pot...meet kettle...


RE: News Corp
By Belard on 8/5/2011 4:08:20 AM , Rating: 1
LOL...

Moron


RE: News Corp
By KoS on 8/5/2011 3:31:32 PM , Rating: 3
wow...and this coming from the "tolerate" left.


RE: News Corp
By Kaleid on 8/4/2011 7:48:10 PM , Rating: 3
It's a very, very biased network...so all that BOTH sides of the story is just slogan marketing BS.


RE: News Corp
By schmandel on 8/5/2011 12:04:40 AM , Rating: 2
Right.

A fishing license should be required for the use of troll bait like that.


RE: News Corp
By kattanna on 8/5/2011 11:54:02 AM , Rating: 1
quote:
They have been stunningly successful at delivering what the public wants.


that point i completely agree

but the "feartainment" they give is not something i would call news.


"A lot of people pay zero for the cellphone ... That's what it's worth." -- Apple Chief Operating Officer Timothy Cook














botimage
Copyright 2013 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki