backtop


Print 23 comment(s) - last by icrf.. on Aug 4 at 9:26 AM


Senator Dick Durbin (D-Ill.)  (Source: blog.nj.com)
The new bill would apply to online retailers like Amazon, and Amazon has agreed to cooperate

Amazon has been battling state after state in an effort to avoid sales tax collection, but a recent bill by Senator Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) is changing Amazon's mind as the federal action gains increased support. 

Amazon, the largest online retailer with over 90 million registered buyers, has been pressured to collect sales taxes by U.S. states in the recent past due to large state budget deficits, and brick-and-mortar stores complaining about unfair competition. According to University of Tennessee studies, states are expected to lose $10 billion in uncollected online sales taxes this year, and another $11.4 billion next year. With states already dealing with weak economies, this additional loss in taxes hurts, and the potential gain could lift them out of the red. 

The online retail market was worth $165 billion last year, and some U.S. states did all they could to get a piece of that. For instance, Texas State Comptroller Susan Combs charged Amazon $269 million in unpaid sales taxes, and California state Governor Jerry Brown recently signed a bill to enforce online sales tax. Both instances caused Amazon to cut ties with in-state affiliates and split, noting that a 1992 Supreme Court ruling excuses the online retailer from collecting taxes in states that do not have company employees or warehouses operating within its borders. 

Amazon has said that it would change its tune if the problem was "fixed properly" with federal legislation. Durbin answered this call a couple of months ago when he introduced the Main Street Fairness Act, which requires all businesses (online and brick-and-mortar alike) to collect sale tax "in the state where the consumer resides." His aim is to give states the authority to require retailers to collect sales taxes already owed, and will not impose new taxes.

The bill is now gaining momentum as it attracts more supporters. Last Friday, the National Governors Association and the National Retail Federation gave the bill their support.

As promised, Amazon has cooperated with the new measure. All the company has asked for is a "national framework" for remote sales taxes, and Paul Misener, Amazon's vice president for global public policy, has written a letter to Durbin pledging to cooperate. 

Analysts at William Blair & Co. have said that Amazon's prices are an average of 11 percent below store prices of half of over 2,000 items for sale at 24 retailers. If Amazon were to begin collecting sales taxes, this 11 percent would drop to the single-digits.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Amazon's position is reasonable
By sabbede on 8/1/2011 10:02:05 AM , Rating: 2
I'm sure they do care about the number of tax codes, especially since its not just one per state, but per municipality. Each county, each city, each town and village can have its own sales tax. Who's going to tell Amazon that the barely-city of Carrollton Georgia passed a SPLOST to fund road repairs?
This won't just be a matter of telling online retailers to collect sales taxes, it will require a whole new infrastructure for reporting and collecting a huge database of ever changing tax data.
Still though, the real problem with California's move was that it was a state interfering with interstate commerce - which is a big no-no. Congress is the only body with the authority to do that, so if they put through a bill it should pass muster. Might not though, the court may see things differently.


RE: Amazon's position is reasonable
By crimson117 on 8/1/2011 11:57:39 AM , Rating: 3
Doesn't bestbuy.com deal with this issue right now?

I'm sure Amazon can figure it out...


By sigmatau on 8/1/2011 1:51:19 PM , Rating: 2
Bingo. This has nothing to do with how many different tax laws they will have to follow. National companies have been doing this for decades.

It all has to do with them not being charged taxes while others are not.


"Mac OS X is like living in a farmhouse in the country with no locks, and Windows is living in a house with bars on the windows in the bad part of town." -- Charlie Miller














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki